A project manager discovers that a critical path activity is behind schedule. The project has no float on the critical path. Which action should the project manager take to bring the project back on track without increasing scope?
Crashing adds resources to reduce duration on critical path.
Why this answer
Crashing the project by assigning additional resources to critical tasks is the correct action because the critical path has zero float, meaning any delay directly extends the project completion date. Crashing adds resources to compress the schedule without changing scope, which is the only viable option when no float exists and scope must remain unchanged.
Exam trap
CompTIA often tests the distinction between fast-tracking (parallel execution) and crashing (adding resources), and the trap here is that candidates confuse fast-tracking as a solution for a behind-schedule critical path, but fast-tracking does not shorten the duration of individual activities and can increase risk, whereas crashing directly reduces activity duration on the critical path.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because adding a new activity to the critical path would increase the total duration, not create more time, and violates the constraint of not increasing scope. Option B is wrong because fast-tracking involves performing critical path activities in parallel, which increases risk and may not be feasible if dependencies are strict; it also does not address the delay directly and can introduce rework. Option D is wrong because implementing a change request to reduce scope of the delayed activity would alter the project scope, which is explicitly prohibited by the question's condition of not increasing scope.