Knowledge + Practice

Project Management Professional PMP (PMP) — Questions 76–150

892 questions total · 12pages · All types, answers revealed

Take a mock exam Exam hub

Page 2 of 12

76

MCQhard

Your project is in execution phase, and a key vendor informs you that they will be unable to deliver a critical component on time due to a supply chain disruption. This risk was identified in the risk register and a contingency plan was developed. The project timeline is tight, and any delay will impact the critical path. What should you do FIRST?

A.Immediately find an alternative vendor who can deliver on time

B.Implement the contingency plan as documented in the risk register and communicate with stakeholders

C.Re-baseline the project schedule to accommodate the delay

D.Alert the project sponsor about the delay and ask for additional time

AnswerB

The contingency plan exists for this exact scenario; implementing it is the correct proactive step.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because the contingency plan already exists for this identified risk. The PM should implement it and communicate the situation to stakeholders. Option A is incorrect because simply alerting without taking action is insufficient.

Option C is incorrect because switching vendors without following the contingency plan may introduce new risks and costs. Option D is incorrect because re-baselining the schedule without approval is not appropriate; contingency plans are meant to be used.

Full explanation →

77

MCQmedium

You are managing a hybrid project that uses both predictive and agile approaches. The team has been delivering consistently, but recently the customer requested a critical feature that was not in the original scope. The feature is high value but will require rework of a completed component. What should the project manager do first?

A.Submit a change request to the change control board (CCB) to evaluate the impact on scope, schedule, and cost.

B.Add the feature to the product backlog and prioritize it for the next sprint without formal approval.

C.Ask the team to implement the feature immediately to maintain customer satisfaction, and document it later.

D.Update the project management plan to include the new feature and communicate the change to the team.

AnswerA

This follows the integrated change control process, which is the correct PMI approach.

Why this answer

The correct answer is to submit a change request through the formal change control process. This ensures proper evaluation and approval before any work begins, aligning with PMI's emphasis on following the change control process.

Full explanation →

78

MCQmedium

You are managing a project to develop a mobile app. During the testing phase, a critical defect is found that could cause data loss. The team estimates it will take one week to fix, but the project is already two weeks behind schedule. What is the BEST course of action?

A.Release the app as scheduled and patch the defect later to avoid further delays

B.Submit a change request to fix the defect, assessing the impact on schedule and cost, and obtain approval

C.Escalate to the sponsor and ask for a decision on whether to fix or release

D.Fix the defect immediately and update the schedule without formal approval

AnswerB

Following change control ensures the decision is informed and documented.

Why this answer

Quality is a key constraint; releasing with a critical defect poses high risk. The PM should follow the change control process to assess the impact and get approval for the fix.

Full explanation →

79

MCQhard

A project manager is managing a hybrid project with both fixed-price and agile components. The sponsor asks the project manager to skip the testing phase for the agile portion to save time, assuring that the team is highly skilled and can deliver quality code without testing. What should the project manager do?

A.Explain the risks of skipping testing and suggest alternatives such as automated testing or risk-based testing

B.Add a buffer in the schedule to compensate for potential rework from skipped testing

C.Escalate the issue to the PMO for guidance

D.Comply with the sponsor's request to save time and maintain a good relationship

AnswerA

The PM should advocate for quality while proposing efficient alternatives.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the project manager has a fiduciary duty to protect the project from unnecessary risk. Skipping testing entirely, even with a highly skilled team, violates the principle of 'inspect and adapt' in agile and ignores the statistical certainty of defects in complex code. Suggesting automated testing or risk-based testing provides a pragmatic compromise that reduces time while maintaining quality assurance, aligning with the hybrid project's need for both speed and governance.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may assume a highly skilled team can skip testing, but the PMP exam tests the principle that quality is non-negotiable and must be built into the process, not inspected in later.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because adding a schedule buffer for rework does not address the root cause of risk; it passively accepts defects rather than preventing them, which is contrary to agile's emphasis on built-in quality. Option C is wrong because escalating to the PMO abdicates the project manager's responsibility to manage stakeholder expectations and make informed decisions; the sponsor's request should be handled through direct communication and negotiation. Option D is wrong because complying with a request that compromises quality violates the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, specifically the duty to report and mitigate risks, and could lead to technical debt and project failure.

Full explanation →

80

MCQeasy

Your project is using a Kanban approach. The team's lead time has increased over the last two weeks, and work items are piling up in the 'In Progress' column. What is the BEST action for the project manager to take?

A.Increase the priority of all items in the backlog

B.Reduce the number of work items allowed in the 'In Progress' column (WIP limit)

C.Add more team members to the project to increase capacity

D.Ask the team to work overtime to clear the backlog

AnswerB

Limiting WIP helps reduce multitasking and improves flow, which is a core Kanban principle.

Why this answer

In Kanban, the primary lever to address flow issues like increased lead time and work piling up in 'In Progress' is to reduce the WIP limit. This forces the team to finish existing work before pulling new items, directly addressing the bottleneck and reducing cycle time. Increasing priority, adding people, or working overtime are classic push-system responses that violate Kanban's pull-based, flow-optimization principles.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Kanban with Scrum or traditional project management, and choose to add resources or work overtime (options C or D) because they think 'more capacity' solves the problem, when in reality Kanban's core mechanism is limiting WIP to improve flow.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because increasing the priority of all items in the backlog does nothing to limit work in progress; it simply reorders the queue without addressing the root cause of congestion, and in Kanban, all items are already prioritized by the team. Option C is wrong because adding more team members to a Kanban system often increases coordination overhead and can actually worsen flow (Brooks' Law), and it does not directly enforce a WIP limit to control the bottleneck. Option D is wrong because asking the team to work overtime is a temporary, unsustainable fix that ignores the systemic flow problem; Kanban emphasizes sustainable pace and process improvement, not heroics.

Full explanation →

81

Multi-Selectmedium

During a project, the team identifies a risk that could cause a significant delay. The risk is not in the risk register. Which THREE actions should the project manager take to respond appropriately?

Select 3 answers

A.Assess the probability and impact of the risk.

B.Develop a risk response plan for the risk.

C.Ignore the risk because it was not identified during planning.

D.Add the risk to the risk register.

E.Immediately implement a risk response without assessment.

AnswersA, B, D

Qualitative analysis is necessary to understand the risk.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because when a new risk is identified, the project manager must first assess its probability and impact to understand the potential effect on project objectives. This assessment provides the data needed to prioritize the risk and determine an appropriate response. Without this evaluation, any subsequent actions would be uninformed and could misallocate resources.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may think they can skip the assessment step and go straight to developing a response, or that risks not in the register can be ignored, but PMI emphasizes that all risks must be formally assessed and documented before any response is implemented.

Full explanation →

82

Matchingmedium

Match each tool or technique to its application in project management.

Drag a concept onto its matching description — or click a concept then click the description.

Concepts

Matches

Measures project performance against scope, schedule, and cost

Identifies the longest sequence of dependent activities

Models project schedule or cost risks using probability distributions

Assigns roles and responsibilities for project tasks

Groups ideas or data into related categories

Why these pairings

These are common tools and techniques used in project management.

Full explanation →

83

MCQmedium

During a project, a risk event that was identified in the risk register occurs. The risk response plan had a mitigation strategy, but it is not fully effective. What should you do first?

A.Implement the contingency plan or develop a workaround and update the risk register

B.Notify the sponsor and request additional time and budget

C.Ignore the risk because the mitigation strategy was already implemented

D.Escalate the risk to the steering committee for resolution

AnswerA

Activating the contingency plan is the immediate response; updating the register and communicating follow.

Why this answer

The project manager should implement the contingency plan or develop a workaround, then update the risk register and communicate with stakeholders.

Full explanation →

84

Multi-Selectmedium

A project manager is leading a team that is newly formed and includes members from different functional areas. The team is experiencing low trust and reluctance to share ideas. The project manager wants to build a high-performing team. Which THREE actions should the project manager take? (Choose three.)

Select 3 answers

A.Provide individual rewards for top performers to motivate competition

B.Assign a mentor from outside the team to guide team members

C.Set clear team goals and define success criteria together

D.Facilitate a team charter workshop to establish shared values and norms

E.Organize team-building activities that focus on collaboration and trust

AnswersC, D, E

Shared goals align efforts and build commitment.

Why this answer

Options A, C, and D are correct. Option A fosters psychological safety. Option C helps build social bonds.

Option D clarifies goals. Option B is wrong because it does not involve the team. Option E is wrong because it focuses on individuals rather than team cohesion.

Full explanation →

85

MCQeasy

Refer to the exhibit. What is the critical path duration?

A.9 days

B.11 days

C.10 days

D.12 days

AnswerB

Critical path is A-C-D = 11 days.

Why this answer

The critical path is the longest path through the network diagram, determining the shortest possible project duration. By summing the durations along each path, Path A-B-E-F totals 11 days (3+2+4+2), which is longer than the other paths, making 11 days the correct critical path duration.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often mistakenly sum all activity durations in the diagram or pick the shortest path, rather than identifying the longest path through the network.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because 9 days is the duration of a non-critical path (e.g., A-C-F at 3+4+2=9 days), not the longest path. Option C is wrong because 10 days is the duration of path A-D-F (3+5+2=10 days), which is shorter than the critical path. Option D is wrong because 12 days would require a longer sequence than any path in the diagram, likely from misadding durations or including non-existent dependencies.

Full explanation →

86

MCQmedium

You are leading a software development project using a hybrid approach. During a sprint review, two senior developers have a heated argument about the technical implementation of a feature. The disagreement is causing tension among the team. What should you do FIRST?

A.Escalate the conflict to the project sponsor

B.Assign the feature to a different developer

C.Meet with both developers separately and then together to find a solution

D.Ask the team members to resolve it on their own

AnswerC

Using conflict resolution techniques to address the issue directly is the best approach.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because, as the project manager, your first responsibility is to address the conflict directly using collaborative conflict resolution techniques. Meeting with each developer separately allows you to understand their technical perspectives without group pressure, and then bringing them together facilitates a solution that respects both viewpoints and maintains team cohesion. This approach aligns with the PMI People domain, emphasizing servant leadership and proactive conflict management.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often choose Option D (let them resolve it on their own) thinking it empowers the team, but the PMP exam expects the project manager to actively facilitate conflict resolution, not delegate it entirely.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because escalating to the sponsor bypasses the project manager's responsibility to resolve team conflicts and undermines your authority; the sponsor should only be involved if the conflict impacts budget or scope. Option B is wrong because reassigning the feature avoids the root cause of the disagreement, fails to resolve the technical dispute, and may demotivate the developers or create future conflicts. Option D is wrong because asking the team to resolve it on their own abdicates your leadership role, and unresolved technical disagreements can escalate, delay the sprint, and damage team dynamics.

Full explanation →

87

MCQmedium

During a project's execution phase, the sponsor asks you to skip the user acceptance testing (UAT) phase to expedite delivery, stating that the client is eager to use the system. What should you do?

A.Skip UAT but add a note in the lessons learned about the decision.

B.Explain the risks of skipping UAT and recommend proceeding with the planned testing.

C.Compromise by reducing UAT to only critical test cases.

D.Agree to skip UAT to meet the sponsor's request and expedite delivery.

AnswerB

The PM should advocate for quality and communicate the impact of bypassing testing.

Why this answer

Skipping UAT poses significant quality and acceptance risks. The PM should communicate the risks to the sponsor and recommend following the quality plan. PMI emphasizes the importance of quality assurance and control processes.

Full explanation →

88

Multi-Selectmedium

You are managing a software upgrade project using a hybrid approach. During execution, the team discovers a critical security vulnerability that was not identified during risk planning. The vulnerability requires immediate patching to avoid a potential data breach. Which TWO actions should you take NEXT?

Select 2 answers

A.Assess the impact of the vulnerability on the project scope, schedule, and cost

B.Submit a change request to address the vulnerability through the appropriate change control process

C.Immediately assign the team to fix the vulnerability without formal approval

D.Add the vulnerability to the risk register and continue with the current sprint as planned

E.Implement a temporary workaround to reduce the risk and monitor the situation

AnswersA, B

Understanding impact is necessary before deciding on a response.

Why this answer

Options B and D are correct. The PM should assess the impact of the vulnerability (B) to understand the urgency and then submit a change request (D) to address it through formal change control. Option A is wrong because ignoring the vulnerability is irresponsible.

Option C is premature before assessment. Option E is wrong because a workaround is not a permanent fix and may not be sufficient.

Full explanation →

89

MCQeasy

You are leading a virtual team across three time zones. During a video conference, you notice that one team member from a remote location has not spoken for the entire meeting. In previous meetings, this team member has also been quiet. What should you do to ensure effective collaboration?

A.Ask the team member directly during the meeting why they are not contributing

B.Assign the team member as the note-taker to ensure they are engaged

C.Assume the team member has nothing to contribute and focus on others

D.Schedule a one-on-one conversation to understand any barriers and encourage participation

AnswerD

A private conversation shows empathy and helps identify barriers, aligning with servant leadership.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because it aligns with the PMP principle of servant leadership and proactive stakeholder engagement. By scheduling a one-on-one conversation, you create a safe environment to identify potential barriers (e.g., time zone fatigue, cultural differences, or technical issues with the virtual platform) that may be inhibiting participation. This approach fosters trust and encourages collaboration without putting the team member on the spot in a group setting.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option A, thinking direct confrontation is 'assertive leadership,' but the PMP exam emphasizes servant leadership and emotional intelligence, which require addressing issues privately and respectfully rather than publicly calling out a team member.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because directly asking the team member during the meeting why they are not contributing can be perceived as confrontational and may cause embarrassment, especially in a virtual setting where non-verbal cues are limited. Option B is wrong because assigning the team member as note-taker does not address the root cause of their silence; it may force engagement but could also create resentment or distraction from their core responsibilities. Option C is wrong because assuming the team member has nothing to contribute ignores the possibility of underlying barriers (e.g., language barriers, lack of confidence, or technical issues) and violates the PMP principle of inclusive leadership.

Full explanation →

90

MCQmedium

You are managing a project in a highly regulated industry. An audit reveals that your project is not fully compliant with a new data privacy regulation. The regulation requires specific data handling procedures that your team has not implemented. What should you do first?

A.Submit a change request to incorporate the regulatory requirements and assess impact on schedule and budget

B.Ignore the audit findings because the project is almost complete

C.Immediately implement the required procedures to avoid legal penalties

D.Update the risk register and continue as planned until the regulation is enforced

AnswerA

Following the change control process ensures that the impact is assessed and approved by the CCB.

Why this answer

The first step is to analyze the gap and submit a change request to implement the required procedures. Compliance is non-negotiable, but changes must follow the formal process.

Full explanation →

91

MCQhard

You are the project manager for a 9-month product launch. At the midpoint review, the earned value analysis shows: EV = $450,000, PV = $500,000, AC = $550,000. The project is underperforming. The sponsor asks for a recovery plan. Which metric should you use to estimate the new total cost at completion assuming no change in cost performance?

A.EAC = AC + (BAC - EV) / (CPI * SPI)

B.EAC = AC + (BAC - EV)

C.EAC = AC + BAC - EV

D.EAC = BAC / CPI

AnswerD

This assumes current cost performance will continue, appropriate for this scenario.

Why this answer

With no change in cost performance, the Estimate at Completion (EAC) using CPI is appropriate: EAC = BAC/CPI. Calculate CPI = EV/AC = 0.818, so EAC = BAC/0.818. Option B is correct.

Options A, C, D are incorrect formulas.

Full explanation →

92

MCQmedium

During a project, a new regulation is introduced that will affect the project's deliverables. The regulation is mandatory and will require changes to the scope. What should the project manager do first?

A.Update the risk register with the regulation as a new risk.

B.Inform the sponsor that the project will be delayed due to the new regulation.

C.Analyze the impact of the regulation on scope, schedule, and cost, and then initiate a change request.

D.Immediately implement the changes to comply with the regulation.

AnswerC

Assess impact first, then follow change control.

Why this answer

When a mandatory regulation impacts project deliverables, the project manager must first analyze the impact on scope, schedule, and cost to understand the full implications. This analysis provides the data needed to initiate a formal change request through the integrated change control process, ensuring the change is evaluated, approved, and documented before implementation. Option C correctly follows the PMBOK Guide's sequence of assess, then request change, rather than jumping to implementation or notification without analysis.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse a mandatory external regulation with a risk, leading them to update the risk register (Option A) instead of recognizing it as a change that requires impact analysis and a formal change request.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the regulation is a known mandatory requirement, not an uncertain event; it should be treated as a change to the project, not a risk to be logged in the risk register. Option B is wrong because the project manager should first analyze the impact before informing the sponsor of delays, as premature notification may be inaccurate and lacks the necessary data for decision-making. Option D is wrong because implementing changes without going through the formal change control process violates project governance and could lead to uncontrolled scope creep, rework, and compliance issues.

Full explanation →

93

Multi-Selecthard

Your agile team has been using Scrum for six months, but the product owner is not consistently available for sprint planning and reviews. The team is frustrated and the last two sprints did not meet the definition of done. Which THREE actions should you take to address this?

Select 3 answers

A.Facilitate a retrospective to discuss the challenges and agree on improvements

B.Implement a new project management tool to improve transparency

C.Assign a proxy product owner from the development team

D.Review and revise the definition of done with the team and product owner

E.Coach the product owner on the importance of their role and availability

AnswersA, D, E

The retrospective is the proper forum for the team to voice concerns and find solutions.

Why this answer

Options B, D, and E are correct. B: The product owner's availability is critical; coaching can help them understand their role. D: The definition of done should be reviewed to ensure it is achievable.

E: The team's frustration should be addressed in a safe environment like the retrospective. Option A is incorrect because a new tool does not solve the availability issue. Option C is incorrect because assigning a proxy product owner without addressing the root cause is not a good long-term solution.

Full explanation →

94

MCQeasy

Your project team includes members from diverse cultural backgrounds. During a meeting, you notice that some team members are not contributing ideas, while others dominate the discussion. What should you do to foster inclusive participation?

A.Allow the meeting to proceed naturally as it is a cultural difference

B.Require each team member to speak at least once per meeting

C.Establish a team charter with ground rules that encourage equal participation

D.Privately ask the dominant members to speak less

AnswerC

A team charter sets expectations for collaboration and can include norms for inclusive meetings.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because establishing team norms for meetings promotes respect and inclusion. Option A is wrong because mandating contributions may intimidate quiet members. Option B is wrong because addressing individuals publicly can cause discomfort.

Option C is wrong because allowing domination undermines team dynamics.

Full explanation →

95

MCQeasy

A key vendor informs you that they cannot deliver a critical component on time due to a supply chain disruption. This risk was identified and included in the risk register. What should you do first?

A.Escalate the issue to the steering committee for guidance

B.Implement the contingency plan that was defined for this risk

C.Brainstorm new solutions with the team since the risk was not anticipated

D.Wait to see if the vendor can resolve the issue before taking action

AnswerB

Since the risk was identified and planned for, executing the contingency plan is the appropriate response.

Why this answer

Since the risk was identified and included in the risk register, a contingency plan should have been defined. The correct first action is to implement that pre-planned contingency plan to address the supply chain disruption, as it is the most efficient and proactive response to a known risk.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse a contingency plan with a fallback plan or assume that all risks require escalation, leading them to choose escalation or unnecessary brainstorming instead of executing the pre-planned response.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because escalation to the steering committee is typically reserved for risks that exceed the project manager's authority or require strategic decisions, not for executing a pre-defined contingency plan. Option C is wrong because brainstorming new solutions is unnecessary when a risk was anticipated and a contingency plan already exists; this would waste time and resources. Option D is wrong because waiting to see if the vendor resolves the issue is a passive response that could lead to further delays, contradicting the proactive risk management approach required when a contingency plan is available.

Full explanation →

96

Multi-Selectmedium

Your project is running 15% over budget at the midpoint. Earned value analysis shows CPI = 0.87 and SPI = 1.02. The project is ahead of schedule but over budget. Which THREE actions should you take?

Select 3 answers

A.Inform the sponsor and stakeholders about the cost performance and planned actions.

B.Reduce quality testing to cut costs.

C.Request additional budget immediately to cover the overrun.

D.Implement cost control measures such as reducing scope or using cheaper resources.

E.Conduct a variance analysis to understand the cause of the overrun.

AnswersA, D, E

Transparent communication with stakeholders is critical when performance deviates.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the PMBOK Guide requires the project manager to proactively communicate cost performance and planned corrective actions to stakeholders and the sponsor, especially when the CPI is 0.87 (15% over budget). This transparency maintains trust and enables informed decision-making, such as approving a change request for additional funds or scope adjustments.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often jump to requesting more budget (option C) or cutting quality (option B) without first performing variance analysis, which is a required step in the PMI process for controlling costs.

Full explanation →

97

Multi-Selecteasy

During a daily standup, a developer mentions that a critical integration task will take longer than expected because of a technical dependency on another team. The project is on a tight schedule. Which THREE actions should you take?

Select 3 answers

A.Help the team remove the impediment by coordinating with the other team's manager

B.Add more tasks to the sprint to keep the team busy

C.Ask the product owner to reprioritize the backlog if the delay affects the sprint goal

D.Immediately inform the sponsor that the project will be delayed

E.Update the risk register with the potential delay and mitigation actions

AnswersA, C, E

Removing impediments is a key responsibility of the Scrum Master.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because removing impediments is the Scrum Master's role. Option B is correct because the product owner should reprioritize if needed. Option C is correct because updating the risk register ensures the issue is tracked.

Option D is wrong because the issue is a dependency, not necessarily a schedule issue yet. Option E is wrong because the team should focus on the current sprint goal.

Full explanation →

98

MCQhard

A project manager observes that a team member is consistently missing deadlines and producing low-quality work. The project manager suspects it is due to personal issues but the team member is reluctant to discuss. What is the best course of action?

A.Schedule a private one-on-one meeting to discuss performance and offer support.

B.Address the issue in the next team meeting to set expectations.

C.Reassign the team member to less critical tasks.

D.Report the team member to HR for performance improvement plan.

AnswerA

Private, supportive approach encourages openness.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because it aligns with the PMP's focus on servant leadership and emotional intelligence. Addressing performance issues privately respects the team member's dignity, opens a safe space to discuss potential personal issues, and allows the project manager to offer support or resources without public embarrassment, which is critical for maintaining trust and motivation.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often choose Option D (HR escalation) because they confuse performance management with punitive action, forgetting that the PMP exam prioritizes servant leadership and coaching over formal disciplinary processes.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because addressing a sensitive personal issue in a team meeting violates confidentiality, can humiliate the team member, and damages team morale; it is not a conflict resolution technique. Option C is wrong because reassigning tasks without first understanding the root cause avoids the problem and may lead to further disengagement or skill atrophy; it is a reactive, not proactive, approach. Option D is wrong because escalating directly to HR for a performance improvement plan bypasses the project manager's responsibility to first attempt coaching and support, and it assumes willful poor performance rather than a potential personal issue.

Full explanation →

99

MCQmedium

You are the project manager for a software development project using Scrum. During the daily standup, two senior developers engage in a heated argument about the technical approach for a user story. The argument is consuming valuable time and escalating. What should you do FIRST?

A.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor for immediate intervention

B.Schedule a private meeting with both developers after the standup to facilitate a resolution

C.Decide on the technical approach yourself to resolve the conflict quickly

D.Ignore the argument and move on to other team members' updates

AnswerB

Addressing conflict privately and collaboratively aligns with PMI's conflict resolution approach.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because the project manager's role in a self-managing Scrum team is to facilitate conflict resolution without imposing decisions. By scheduling a private meeting after the standup, you allow the developers to resolve the technical disagreement collaboratively, preserving team autonomy and avoiding disruption to the daily Scrum's timebox. This approach aligns with the PMP's emphasis on servant leadership and conflict management techniques like 'collaborating' or 'problem-solving'.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse the project manager's authority with a directive role, leading them to choose Option C (deciding the approach themselves) instead of recognizing that the PM should facilitate team self-resolution in a separate setting.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because escalating to the project sponsor bypasses the team's self-management and is premature; the sponsor is not involved in day-to-day technical decisions, and this could undermine the team's ownership. Option C is wrong because the project manager should not unilaterally decide on a technical approach, as this violates the Scrum principle of self-organizing teams and may lead to resentment or suboptimal solutions. Option D is wrong because ignoring the argument allows the conflict to fester, potentially damaging team dynamics and delaying the sprint goal; the daily standup is a coordination event, not a problem-solving forum.

Full explanation →

100

MCQeasy

A project team member from a different culture consistently remains silent during daily stand-ups and rarely contributes ideas. Other team members are frustrated because they feel the person is not engaged. What should the project manager do FIRST?

A.During the next stand-up, directly ask the team member to share their progress and ideas

B.Reassign the team member to a solo task where they can work independently

C.Inform the team that the member is disengaged and they should not rely on them

D.Schedule a one-on-one meeting with the team member to understand their communication style and any barriers

AnswerD

Understanding individual needs and cultural differences promotes inclusion and effective collaboration.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because the project manager should first seek to understand the team member's perspective and any cultural or personal barriers before taking action. Directly addressing the behavior in a one-on-one setting aligns with the PMP's emphasis on servant leadership and emotional intelligence, ensuring the root cause is identified rather than assuming disengagement.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option A, thinking direct questioning shows assertiveness, but the PMP exam prioritizes understanding individual differences and using empathetic, private inquiry before any public or corrective action.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because publicly pressuring the team member during a stand-up could cause embarrassment or reinforce their silence, especially if cultural norms discourage speaking up in groups. Option B is wrong because reassigning the team member to solo work isolates them further and avoids addressing the underlying communication issue, which may stem from cultural differences or lack of psychological safety. Option C is wrong because labeling the team member as disengaged to the team violates confidentiality, creates a hostile environment, and fails to resolve the root cause.

Full explanation →

101

MCQmedium

During a project's execution phase, a key stakeholder requests a change that would add a new feature. The project manager estimates the impact: 2 additional weeks to schedule and $15,000 to budget. The project currently has 0 schedule reserve and $5,000 contingency reserve. What should the project manager do first?

A.Approve the change using contingency reserve and inform the stakeholder

B.Implement the change immediately since the stakeholder is key

C.Reject the change because there is insufficient reserve

D.Document the change request and conduct a formal impact analysis

AnswerD

This is the first step in the change control process as per PMBOK.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because the PMBOK Guide mandates that all change requests must be formally documented and analyzed for impact before any approval or rejection. Even though the project has a contingency reserve, the change introduces a new feature, which is a scope change requiring a formal change control process. The project manager must first document the request and conduct a thorough impact analysis to assess alternatives, risks, and stakeholder implications before deciding on the change.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume a key stakeholder's request can be approved immediately using contingency reserve, confusing the purpose of contingency reserve (for risk responses) with the need for a formal change control process for scope changes.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because approving the change using contingency reserve without formal documentation and analysis violates the change control process; contingency reserve is for known risks, not unplanned scope changes. Option B is wrong because implementing the change immediately bypasses the formal change control board (CCB) approval and impact analysis, risking scope creep and budget overruns. Option C is wrong because rejecting the change outright without documenting and analyzing it first is premature; the project manager should first assess the impact and explore alternatives, such as trade-offs or requesting additional budget.

Full explanation →

102

MCQhard

You are managing a large-scale project with multiple vendors. One vendor is consistently late in delivering critical components, jeopardizing the project schedule. The vendor blames the delays on your team's incomplete specifications. What should you do first?

A.Conduct a root cause analysis with the vendor and your team to identify underlying issues and develop a corrective action plan

B.Request that your team rework the specifications to be more detailed and clear

C.Replace the vendor with a new one that can meet the deadlines

D.Formally notify the vendor of the delays and threaten legal action if performance does not improve

AnswerA

Collaborative root cause analysis aligns with PMI's emphasis on communication and problem-solving before escalation.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because, as a project manager, your first step should be to investigate the root cause of the conflict before taking corrective action. Conducting a root cause analysis with both the vendor and your team aligns with the PMI's 'Manage Stakeholder Engagement' and 'Manage Team' processes, ensuring you address the underlying issue (incomplete specifications vs. vendor performance) rather than symptoms. This collaborative approach preserves the relationship and prevents recurrence, which is critical for a large-scale project with multiple vendors.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often jump to a 'fix the specs' or 'punish the vendor' solution without first validating the root cause, confusing a symptom (late delivery) with the underlying problem (which could be on either side or both).

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because it assumes the specifications are the sole cause without verification, which could waste effort if the vendor has other performance issues or if the specifications are already adequate; it also ignores the need for joint analysis. Option C is wrong because replacing a vendor is a drastic, last-resort action that should only be taken after root cause analysis and attempts to correct the issue, as it introduces new risks like onboarding delays and contractual penalties. Option D is wrong because threatening legal action escalates conflict prematurely, damages the stakeholder relationship, and violates the PMI's principle of collaborative problem-solving; it should only be considered after all other resolution attempts fail.

Full explanation →

103

MCQmedium

You are managing a marketing campaign project using an agile approach. During the daily standup, a developer mentions they have started working on a feature that was not agreed upon in sprint planning. The product owner is not aware of this work. What should you do as the Scrum Master?

A.Allow the developer to continue because the feature might add value

B.Remind the team that only items from the sprint backlog should be worked on, and ask the developer to stop and discuss with the product owner after the standup

C.Ask the developer to work on the feature after the current sprint

D.Add the feature to the product backlog and ignore it for now

AnswerB

The Scrum Master protects the sprint scope and ensures transparency.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the Scrum Master should ensure that only planned work is done during the sprint. Option B is wrong because it allows scope creep. Option C is wrong because the product owner should be informed first.

Option D is wrong because the team should not work on unplanned items without agreement.

Full explanation →

104

MCQmedium

During a project status meeting, a sponsor mentions that they have been directly assigning tasks to a team member without going through you. The team member is now confused about priorities. What should you do FIRST?

A.Schedule a meeting with the sponsor to review the communication management plan and roles

B.Report the sponsor's behavior to the PMO or senior management

C.Tell the team member to ignore the sponsor's requests

D.Update the team member's task list to include the sponsor's assignments

AnswerA

Direct communication to reinforce the agreed-upon process is the correct first step.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the first step in resolving a communication breakdown is to address the root cause: the sponsor is bypassing the project manager's authority and the established communication management plan. By scheduling a meeting with the sponsor to review the plan and their roles, you reaffirm the agreed-upon escalation and task assignment processes, which is a proactive, professional approach aligned with PMBOK's principles of managing stakeholder expectations and enforcing the project's governance framework.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option B (escalation) because they assume the sponsor is acting maliciously, but the PMP exam emphasizes first attempting direct, respectful communication to resolve the issue before escalating.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because immediately reporting to the PMO or senior management escalates the issue without first attempting to resolve it directly with the sponsor, which violates the principle of addressing conflicts at the lowest appropriate level and could damage the sponsor relationship. Option C is wrong because telling the team member to ignore the sponsor's requests is confrontational, undermines the sponsor's authority, and fails to address the underlying process issue; it also risks creating further confusion and resentment. Option D is wrong because updating the team member's task list without consulting the sponsor or re-evaluating priorities based on the project's scope and schedule could lead to scope creep, resource over-allocation, and a breakdown of the change control process.

Full explanation →

105

MCQhard

You are the project manager for a large infrastructure project. Midway through, a new regulatory requirement is introduced that mandates additional environmental testing, which could delay the project by one month and increase costs by 5%. The change control board (CCB) is scheduled to meet in two weeks. What should you do FIRST?

A.Instruct the team to start the additional testing immediately to avoid further delay

B.Ignore the requirement until the CCB meets, then decide

C.Analyze the impact of the regulatory requirement and prepare a change request for the CCB meeting

D.Submit a change request immediately to the CCB without detailed analysis

AnswerC

The PM should assess the impact first to provide the CCB with necessary information for decision-making.

Why this answer

The PM must first assess the impact of the new regulation on the project's scope, schedule, cost, and quality before presenting it to the CCB. This analysis informs the change request. Simply waiting or proceeding without analysis is not appropriate.

Full explanation →

106

MCQhard

You are managing a pharmaceutical research project using a hybrid approach. Midway through, a new regulatory requirement is announced that will affect your project's deliverables. The compliance deadline is before your planned project completion. What should you do first?

A.Update the project management plan to incorporate the new requirement.

B.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor and ask for guidance.

C.Perform an impact analysis to determine the effect on scope, schedule, cost, and quality.

D.Immediately inform the project sponsor and request additional budget and time.

AnswerC

Impact analysis is the logical first step to understand the implications before proposing changes.

Why this answer

The first step is to analyze the impact of the new requirement on the project. This will inform the change request and subsequent actions. PMI emphasizes assessing impact before making decisions.

Full explanation →

107

MCQhard

Your project is in the execution phase. A team member reports that a supplier delivered a batch of raw materials that do not meet the quality specifications. The supplier insists the materials are acceptable and offers a discount. The project sponsor wants to accept the discount to save costs. What should the project manager do?

A.Accept the materials and reduce testing to offset the cost risk

B.Let the team decide whether to use the materials

C.Reject the materials and require the supplier to provide conforming materials

D.Accept the discount and use the materials to save project costs

AnswerC

The quality plan requires materials to meet specifications.

Why this answer

Option B is correct. The PM should follow the quality plan and reject non-conforming materials. Accepting them could impact quality and lead to rework.

Option A is wrong because it bypasses quality. Option C is wrong because the PM should not leave it to the team. Option D is wrong because the sponsor's cost concern doesn't override quality.

Full explanation →

108

MCQhard

An executive stakeholder has been directly contacting your team members and assigning them work that is not in the sprint backlog. The team is feeling pressured and confused about priorities. What should the project manager do?

A.Inform the project sponsor about the executive's behavior and ask them to intervene.

B.Tell the team to prioritize the executive's requests to maintain a good relationship.

C.Speak privately with the executive to explain the impact on the project and ask them to route requests through the proper channels.

D.Update the risk register to document this as a future risk.

AnswerC

Direct, respectful communication with the stakeholder is the best approach.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the project manager must address scope creep and priority conflicts directly with the stakeholder who is causing the disruption. By speaking privately with the executive, the PM can explain how unauthorized work impacts the sprint goal, team velocity, and project deliverables, and request that all work be routed through the proper change control or product owner process. This aligns with the PM's responsibility to manage stakeholder expectations and protect the team from conflicting priorities.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option A (escalation) because they think the sponsor has authority over the executive, but the PM should first attempt direct resolution with the stakeholder, as escalation is a last resort and can be seen as a failure of stakeholder management.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because escalating to the sponsor without first attempting to resolve the issue directly with the executive bypasses the stakeholder management process and may damage the relationship unnecessarily. Option B is wrong because telling the team to prioritize the executive's requests undermines the sprint backlog, destroys team autonomy, and violates the Agile principle of protecting the team from external interference. Option D is wrong because updating the risk register is a reactive documentation step that does not address the immediate problem of unauthorized work being assigned; the PM must take proactive action to stop the behavior first.

Full explanation →

109

MCQhard

In a Scrum team, the product owner frequently changes priorities within a sprint, causing the team to abandon work mid-task. The team is becoming demotivated. What should the scrum master do?

A.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor to overrule the product owner

B.Shorten the sprint length to two or three days to accommodate frequent changes

C.Accept the changes as the product owner has authority over priorities

D.Coach the product owner on the impact of changing priorities mid-sprint and reinforce the sprint backlog agreement

AnswerD

Coaching aligns with the scrum master's role as a servant leader and process guardian.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because the Scrum Master's primary role is to coach the Product Owner and the team on Scrum principles, including the importance of a stable Sprint Backlog. Changing priorities mid-sprint violates the Sprint Goal and undermines team focus, leading to demotivation. By reinforcing the Sprint Backlog agreement, the Scrum Master protects the team from disruption while respecting the Product Owner's authority outside the sprint.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse the Product Owner's authority over the Product Backlog with the ability to change the Sprint Backlog mid-sprint, leading them to incorrectly accept the changes (Option C) instead of recognizing the Scrum Master's duty to enforce the sprint boundary.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because escalating to the project sponsor bypasses the Scrum framework's self-management and the Product Owner's legitimate authority over backlog priorities; it also undermines the Scrum Master's coaching role. Option B is wrong because shortening the sprint length to two or three days does not solve the root cause of priority changes and would increase overhead from more frequent sprint planning and reviews, potentially worsening team disruption. Option C is wrong because while the Product Owner has authority over priorities, accepting changes mid-sprint violates the Scrum Guide's rule that no changes should be made to the Sprint Backlog during the sprint, and it ignores the Scrum Master's responsibility to enforce Scrum rules.

Full explanation →

110

MCQeasy

A team member consistently misses deadlines, causing delays in dependent tasks. During a one-on-one meeting, the team member admits to feeling overwhelmed and unsure how to prioritize work. What should the project manager do FIRST?

A.Reassign the team member's tasks to other team members to avoid further delays

B.Provide coaching and training on time management and prioritization techniques

C.Inform the project sponsor that a team member is underperforming and may need to be replaced

D.Formally document the issue in the team member's performance record

AnswerB

Helping the team member develop skills addresses the root cause and aligns with the PM's role in team development.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the root cause is a skill gap in prioritization, so the PM should provide support through training or coaching. Option A is wrong because reassigning tasks without addressing the root cause may not solve the problem. Option B is wrong because formal escalation should be a last resort.

Option D is wrong because notifying the sponsor prematurely bypasses the PM's responsibility to manage the team.

Full explanation →

111

MCQhard

During a sprint planning meeting, the product owner proposes a user story that the team believes is too vague and lacks clear acceptance criteria. The product owner insists it must be included in the sprint to meet a stakeholder deadline. What should the scrum master do?

A.Accept the story as is to meet the deadline

B.Escalate to the project sponsor

C.Facilitate a discussion to refine the story with the product owner and team, and suggest splitting it

D.Remove the product owner from the meeting

AnswerC

Collaborative refinement ensures clarity and value while meeting deadlines.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the Scrum Master's primary responsibility is to facilitate collaboration and ensure the team works with clear, actionable items. By facilitating a discussion to refine the story and suggesting splitting it, the Scrum Master helps the team achieve a shared understanding and create acceptance criteria, while still addressing the stakeholder deadline. This approach aligns with the Agile principle of delivering value incrementally and avoids committing to vague work that could lead to rework or failure.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may think the Scrum Master should enforce strict rules by removing the product owner (Option D) or blindly accept the story to please stakeholders (Option A), but the PMP exam tests the servant-leader role of facilitating collaboration and negotiation, not unilateral action or avoidance.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because accepting a vague story without clear acceptance criteria violates the Definition of Ready and increases the risk of delivering incomplete or incorrect functionality, undermining the sprint goal. Option B is wrong because escalating to the project sponsor bypasses the self-organizing team and the product owner's authority over the backlog, and it does not resolve the lack of clarity; the Scrum Master should first facilitate within the team. Option D is wrong because removing the product owner from the meeting is an extreme, non-collaborative action that destroys trust and violates the Scrum principle of open communication; the product owner is a key stakeholder in sprint planning.

Full explanation →

112

MCQmedium

Your project is running 15% over budget at the midpoint. The earned value (EV) is $500,000, actual cost (AC) is $575,000, and planned value (PV) is $550,000. The project sponsor is concerned and asks for an estimate at completion (EAC). Assuming the cost performance index (CPI) will continue as is, what is the EAC?

A.$1,100,000

B.$1,200,000

C.$1,175,000

D.$1,265,000

AnswerD

EAC = BAC/CPI = 1,100,000 / (500,000/575,000) ≈ 1,265,000.

Why this answer

Option C is correct. CPI = EV/AC = 500,000/575,000 ≈ 0.8696. EAC = BAC/CPI.

BAC is not given directly, but from PV at midpoint (50% planned), BAC = 550,000 * 2 = 1,100,000. So EAC = 1,100,000 / 0.8696 ≈ 1,265,000. Option A uses BAC, B uses incorrect formula, D uses AC + (BAC - EV) which assumes future work at planned rate.

Full explanation →

113

MCQhard

You are managing a large project with multiple vendors. One vendor has delivered a critical component two weeks late, jeopardizing the project schedule. The vendor claims that the delay was caused by unclear specifications from your team. Your team insists the specifications were clear. What should you do FIRST?

A.Review the contract and specifications yourself to determine who is at fault

B.Refer the matter to the legal department for breach of contract

C.Ask the vendor to expedite delivery at no extra cost to make up for the delay

D.Facilitate a meeting between the vendor and your team to clarify specifications and agree on a recovery plan

AnswerD

Facilitation promotes collaboration and aims to resolve the root cause while maintaining the relationship.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because, as the project manager, your first responsibility is to facilitate collaboration and resolve the root cause of the conflict—unclear specifications—before escalating or assigning blame. By bringing the vendor and your team together, you can clarify the requirements, identify the actual gap, and jointly develop a recovery plan to mitigate the schedule impact. This aligns with the PMP's focus on stakeholder engagement and conflict resolution as a proactive leadership practice.

Exam trap

The trap here is that many candidates assume the PM should immediately investigate or assign blame (Option A) or escalate to legal (Option B), but the PMP exam consistently tests that the FIRST action must be collaborative communication to resolve the issue at the lowest possible level before escalating.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because reviewing the contract and specifications yourself is a unilateral, detective approach that bypasses collaborative problem-solving and may escalate conflict; the PM should first facilitate communication, not act as a judge. Option B is wrong because referring the matter to legal for breach of contract is premature and adversarial—legal escalation should be a last resort after collaborative resolution attempts have failed, as it damages the vendor relationship and delays recovery. Option C is wrong because asking the vendor to expedite at no extra cost assumes the vendor is at fault and ignores the possibility that unclear specifications contributed to the delay; this approach fails to address the root cause and may lead to further disputes.

Full explanation →

114

MCQmedium

Your project is halfway through its schedule. Earned value analysis shows: EV = $120,000, PV = $150,000, AC = $140,000. What is the best interpretation of the project's performance?

A.The project is behind schedule but under budget.

B.The project is behind schedule and over budget.

C.The project is on schedule and under budget.

D.The project is ahead of schedule but over budget.

AnswerB

SPI=0.8 (<1) means behind schedule; CPI=0.857 (<1) means over budget.

Why this answer

SPI = EV/PV = 0.8, indicates behind schedule. CPI = EV/AC = 0.857, indicates over budget. The project is both behind schedule and over budget.

Full explanation →

115

MCQmedium

You are managing a software development project using a hybrid approach. During a sprint review, the customer expresses dissatisfaction with a recently delivered feature, stating it does not meet their expectations. The feature was built according to the approved requirements. What should you do first?

A.Immediately escalate the issue to the project sponsor for resolution

B.Explain to the customer that the feature was delivered as per the approved requirements and no changes are possible

C.Meet with the customer to clarify their expectations and document the issue in an issue log for further analysis

D.Ask the team to revise the requirements document to match the customer's expectations

AnswerC

Understanding the gap and documenting it allows for proper evaluation and potential change request.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the first step is to understand the customer's perspective and document the issue formally. Option A is wrong because it assumes the requirements are wrong without investigation. Option B is wrong because ignoring the customer is not proactive.

Option D is wrong because escalating before understanding is premature.

Full explanation →

116

MCQmedium

During a sprint review, the product owner rejects a user story because it does not meet the acceptance criteria. The developer who worked on it becomes defensive and argues that the implementation is technically superior to what was requested. What should the project manager do?

A.Support the product owner's decision and remind the developer to adhere to the agreed acceptance criteria in the future

B.Escalate to the project sponsor to resolve the disagreement between the developer and the product owner

C.Allow the developer to present the technical benefits and let the team vote on whether to keep the implementation

D.Suggest that the team rework the story to match the acceptance criteria while still incorporating the superior implementation

AnswerA

The PM should reinforce the product owner's authority and discourage gold-plating.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because the product owner is the authority on acceptance criteria. Gold-plating is not acceptable. Option A would continue the argument.

Option C is wrong because the team should deliver what was requested. Option D escalates unnecessarily.

Full explanation →

117

Multi-Selectmedium

A project manager is leading a hybrid project. The team is co-located but the project manager observes that some team members are reluctant to share opposing views during discussions, leading to groupthink. Which TWO actions should the project manager take to foster a culture of constructive debate?

Select 2 answers

A.Implement anonymous voting for all decisions

B.Assign one team member to play the 'devil's advocate' in each meeting to challenge ideas

C.Establish ground rules that encourage respectful disagreement and reward diverse perspectives

D.Make decisions quickly to avoid prolonged debates

E.Only ask for opinions from senior team members to streamline discussions

AnswersB, C

This formalizes the challenge process and encourages critical thinking.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because assigning a 'devil's advocate' systematically introduces constructive challenge, directly countering groupthink by ensuring every idea is tested. Option C is correct because establishing ground rules that reward respectful disagreement creates a psychological safety net, encouraging team members to voice opposing views without fear of reprisal.

Exam trap

PMI often tests the misconception that anonymous voting (Option A) is a valid way to encourage debate, when in fact it avoids the open dialogue needed to surface and resolve conflicting viewpoints.

Full explanation →

118

MCQmedium

Your project is a traditional waterfall project. You are creating the work breakdown structure (WBS) for a new software development project. The team is having difficulty decomposing a complex deliverable. What is the BEST action to take?

A.Engage subject matter experts to help decompose the deliverable further

B.Freeze the scope at this level and move on to scheduling

C.Skip decomposition and proceed with the project

D.Use the work packages from a similar project directly

AnswerA

Expert judgment helps in detailed decomposition.

Why this answer

Option C is correct. The PM should use expert judgment and iterative decomposition to refine the WBS. Option A is wrong because scope is not fixed yet.

Option B is wrong because the WBS is a decomposition tool, not a schedule. Option D is wrong because the PM should not leave it unresolved.

Full explanation →

119

MCQeasy

You are leading a globally distributed agile team. During the daily stand-up, you notice that the team member in India consistently speaks little compared to others, while the US-based members dominate the conversation. What should you do to foster inclusion?

A.Let the team continue as is, as it is a natural dynamic

B.Implement a round-robin format where each team member shares updates in turn

C.Ask the quiet team member directly why they are not speaking

D.Reduce the frequency of the daily stand-up to once a week

AnswerB

Round-robin ensures equal participation and avoids dominance by a few voices.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because implementing a round-robin format ensures equitable participation by structurally requiring each team member to speak in turn, directly addressing the imbalance caused by time zone and cultural differences. This technique fosters inclusion by removing the dominance of louder voices and giving the quieter team member a dedicated, safe opportunity to contribute, which aligns with the agile principle of self-organizing teams and the PMI Talent Triangle's emphasis on leadership and team management.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option C (asking the quiet member directly) because it seems proactive and empathetic, but PMI expects a process-based solution that addresses the team dynamic rather than singling out an individual, which could violate the principle of respect and create a hostile environment.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because allowing the natural dynamic to continue perpetuates an exclusionary environment where the Indian team member's voice is systematically marginalized, violating the agile value of individuals and interactions and the PMP code of conduct's requirement for respect and inclusion. Option C is wrong because directly asking the quiet team member why they are not speaking can be perceived as confrontational or singling them out, potentially causing embarrassment or defensiveness, especially in a cross-cultural context where indirect communication is preferred; it does not address the systemic issue of unequal airtime. Option D is wrong because reducing the frequency of the daily stand-up to once a week eliminates the primary synchronization event for a distributed team, undermining the inspect-and-adapt cycle of Scrum and increasing the risk of misalignment and delayed issue detection, while doing nothing to solve the inclusion problem.

Full explanation →

120

MCQhard

During a hybrid project, an executive stakeholder bypasses you and directly instructs a team member to add a new feature. The team member is now confused about priorities. What should you do first?

A.Meet with the executive stakeholder to explain the project's change control process and the importance of proper communication channels

B.Ignore the issue and allow the feature to be added to maintain stakeholder satisfaction

C.Reprimand the team member for accepting instructions without your approval

D.Add the feature to the backlog and treat it as a priority

AnswerA

This proactive communication reinforces governance and prevents future bypassing.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because, as the project manager, you must first address the root cause of the confusion—the executive stakeholder's bypass of the formal change control process. By meeting with the executive, you reinforce the importance of proper communication channels and the change control board (CCB) process, which protects the project from scope creep and ensures all changes are evaluated for impact on cost, schedule, and quality. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's principle of managing stakeholder engagement and maintaining a single point of accountability for project decisions.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option D (adding the feature to the backlog) because it seems like a quick, agile-friendly fix, but this ignores the need to first address the process violation and the stakeholder's behavior, which is the root cause of the confusion.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because ignoring the issue and allowing the feature to be added without change control violates the project's governance framework, leading to uncontrolled scope creep, potential budget overruns, and schedule delays—this is a direct failure of the project manager's responsibility to manage changes. Option C is wrong because reprimanding the team member is counterproductive; the team member was following a direct instruction from a senior stakeholder, and the fault lies in the stakeholder's bypass of the process, not the team member's compliance. Option D is wrong because adding the feature to the backlog as a priority without proper evaluation through the change control process undermines the project's prioritization framework and could disrupt the sprint or phase goals, especially in a hybrid project where both predictive and adaptive elements must be balanced.

Full explanation →

121

MCQeasy

During a project status meeting, a key stakeholder expresses dissatisfaction with the quality of deliverables. The team believes they have met all acceptance criteria. What should the project manager do?

A.Arrange a meeting with the stakeholder to understand their concerns and review the acceptance criteria

B.Add the stakeholder's feedback to the lessons learned and move on

C.Initiate a formal quality audit to verify compliance with requirements

D.Explain that the deliverables meet the agreed criteria and ask the stakeholder to accept them

AnswerA

Communication and alignment are key PMI principles.

Why this answer

Option C is correct: The PM should facilitate a meeting to clarify expectations and align on quality standards. Option A dismisses the stakeholder, B is reactive, D avoids the issue.

Full explanation →

122

Multi-Selectmedium

A project manager is planning stakeholder engagement for a complex project with many interested parties. Which THREE techniques are MOST effective for analyzing stakeholders?

Select 3 answers

A.Communication requirements analysis

B.Stakeholder engagement assessment matrix

C.Power/interest grid

D.Affinity diagram

E.Stakeholder mapping / salience model

AnswersB, C, E

Identifies gaps in engagement.

Why this answer

Option A helps categorize based on power and interest. Option B visualizes relationships. Option D assesses current vs desired engagement.

Option C is a communication tool, not analysis; Option E is a quality tool.

Full explanation →

123

MCQhard

Your project is using a predictive approach. A key vendor notifies you that they will be unable to deliver a critical component for another four weeks. This component is on the critical path, and you have no schedule reserve left. You have identified that a different vendor can deliver in two weeks at a 20% higher cost. What should you do FIRST?

A.Immediately contract the alternative vendor to avoid further delay

B.Perform a quantitative analysis comparing the cost of the alternative vendor versus the cost of delay, then submit a change request

C.Ask the original vendor to expedite delivery at no extra cost

D.Update the risk register and accept the four-week delay

AnswerB

PMI recommends analysis before decision. Submitting a change request ensures formal approval.

Why this answer

The first step is to evaluate the situation objectively: assess the cost and schedule impact of each option, then proceed with the change control process to implement the best solution.

Full explanation →

124

MCQmedium

A project manager is reviewing the earned value report. The SPI is 0.85 and the CPI is 0.90. The project is behind schedule and over budget. Several team members are working overtime to catch up. What should the PM do FIRST?

A.Mandate mandatory overtime for all team members

B.Conduct a root cause analysis of the cost and schedule variances

C.Request additional budget from the sponsor

D.Rebaseline the project schedule and budget

AnswerB

Understanding the cause of variances is the first step to determining appropriate corrective actions.

Why this answer

Before taking corrective action, the PM should analyze the root cause of the variances. Simply ordering more overtime or requesting more budget without understanding the cause is not effective.

Full explanation →

125

Multi-Selecteasy

During a project closure phase, which TWO documents should be updated and archived?

Select 2 answers

A.Final project report

B.Issue log

C.Risk register

D.Lessons learned register

E.Project schedule (final baseline)

AnswersA, D

The final project report summarizes performance and is archived.

Why this answer

Lessons learned and final project report are key closure documents. The risk register is used during execution, not necessarily archived as a deliverable.

Full explanation →

126

Matchingmedium

Match each project document to its description.

Drag a concept onto its matching description — or click a concept then click the description.

Concepts

Matches

Authorizes the project and assigns the project manager

Defines how the project is executed, monitored, and controlled

Hierarchical decomposition of total project work

List of identified risks, their analysis, and response plans

Records knowledge gained during the project

Why these pairings

These are key project documents used throughout the project lifecycle.

Full explanation →

127

Multi-Selectmedium

During a project retrospective, the team identifies that low morale is affecting productivity. As a servant leader, which THREE actions should the project manager take to address this?

Select 3 answers

A.Provide opportunities for professional development and training.

B.Implement a strict performance monitoring system to track productivity.

C.Recognize and celebrate team achievements, both big and small.

D.Assign blame for the low morale to specific team members.

E.Empower the team to make decisions about their work processes.

AnswersA, C, E

Investing in team growth shows care and improves skills and motivation.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because providing professional development and training directly addresses low morale by investing in the team's growth, which aligns with the servant leader's focus on empowering and supporting the team. This action fosters a sense of value and career progression, counteracting the root cause of low morale rather than just its symptoms.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse 'addressing low morale' with 'controlling productivity' (Option B) or 'finding fault' (Option D), failing to recognize that servant leadership requires removing obstacles and empowering the team, not imposing external controls or blame.

Full explanation →

128

MCQmedium

Your project is running 15% over budget at the midpoint. The team is motivated, but the sponsor is concerned. What should you do first?

A.Immediately reduce team resources to cut costs

B.Request the team to work overtime without additional pay

C.Conduct a variance analysis to identify the reasons for the overspend

D.Ask the sponsor for additional funding

AnswerC

Analysis helps determine if corrective action or a change request is needed.

Why this answer

Understanding the root cause of the variance is essential before taking corrective action. Option C involves analyzing the variance to determine if it's a trend or one-time issue.

Full explanation →

129

Multi-Selecthard

During a sprint review, the product owner requests a significant scope change that would add two new features. The team estimates this would extend the sprint by one week. You are the Scrum Master. Which THREE actions should you take?

Select 3 answers

A.Ask the product owner to prioritize the new features against existing backlog items

B.Instruct the team to start working on the new features immediately

C.Agree to extend the sprint by one week to accommodate the changes

D.Communicate the potential impact on the release plan to stakeholders

E.Add the new features to the product backlog for consideration in a future sprint

AnswersA, D, E

The PO owns the backlog and should prioritize based on value.

Why this answer

Option A is correct: the PO should prioritize. Option C is correct: the change should be added to the backlog and addressed in future sprints. Option E is correct: the impact should be communicated transparently.

Option B is wrong because it violates the sprint commitment. Option D is wrong because the team should not work unapproved changes.

Full explanation →

130

MCQhard

Your predictive project is halfway through execution. A team member has been consistently missing deadlines, and their work quality is declining. You suspect personal issues but are unsure. The project is at risk of schedule delays. What should you do FIRST?

A.Escalate the issue to human resources for disciplinary action

B.Schedule a private meeting to discuss their performance concerns and offer support

C.Formally document the underperformance and issue a performance improvement plan

D.Reassign their tasks to other team members to protect the schedule

AnswerB

A private, empathetic conversation is the first step to understand the root cause and provide appropriate support.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because a private, empathetic conversation helps understand the root cause and shows concern for the individual, aligning with servant leadership. Option A is incorrect because immediate reassignment may demoralize the team member and does not address the issue. Option C is incorrect because escalating to HR without first understanding the situation is premature.

Option D is incorrect because a performance improvement plan should come after understanding the cause and attempting to address it.

Full explanation →

131

MCQeasy

Two senior developers on your Scrum team have a disagreement about the technical approach for a user story. The disagreement is causing delays in sprint execution. As the Scrum Master, what should you do FIRST?

A.Escalate the issue to the product owner

B.Remove both developers from the story and assign it to someone else

C.Decide on the approach yourself to end the conflict quickly

D.Facilitate a meeting between the developers to discuss and resolve the issue

AnswerD

Facilitating conflict resolution is a key Scrum Master responsibility.

Why this answer

The Scrum Master should facilitate a discussion to help the developers resolve the conflict constructively and reach a consensus.

Full explanation →

132

MCQmedium

During a project, an executive stakeholder bypasses you and directly assigns work to your team members. This has caused confusion and rework. What is the best action for you to take?

A.Instruct the team to ignore any direct requests from the executive

B.Escalate the issue to the sponsor without talking to the executive first

C.Update the communications management plan to prohibit direct stakeholder-to-team communication

D.Speak directly to the executive and explain the impact of bypassing the project manager

AnswerD

Addressing the issue directly with the stakeholder is the proactive approach to re-establish proper channels.

Why this answer

The project manager should communicate with the executive to clarify the proper communication channels and reinforce the project management plan. This aligns with PMI's emphasis on stakeholder engagement and communication.

Full explanation →

133

Multi-Selectmedium

During a sprint retrospective, the team identifies that unclear requirements from the product owner are causing rework. The team suggests improvements. Which THREE actions should the project manager (Scrum Master) take?

Select 3 answers

A.Add buffer time to the sprint plan to accommodate potential rework

B.Instruct the team to proceed with their best interpretation of requirements

C.Introduce a requirements clarification step before each sprint planning

D.Work with the product owner to implement one of the team's suggested improvements in the next sprint

E.Ensure the product owner attends all sprint planning and grooming sessions to clarify requirements

AnswersC, D, E

An upfront clarification step helps ensure requirements are understood before the sprint begins.

Why this answer

Options A, C, and D are correct because implementing one improvement per sprint, ensuring the product owner participates, and adding a requirements clarification step address the root cause. Option B is incorrect because adding buffer time does not solve the root cause. Option E is incorrect because bypassing the product owner violates the Scrum framework.

Full explanation →

134

MCQmedium

Your project's Earned Value (EV) is $45,000, Planned Value (PV) is $50,000, and Actual Cost (AC) is $55,000. The project is at the midpoint. What is the most accurate assessment of the project's status?

A.The project is ahead of schedule and under budget

B.The project is behind schedule and under budget

C.The project is on schedule and over budget

D.The project is behind schedule and over budget

AnswerD

SPI=0.9 (behind), CPI=0.82 (over budget).

Why this answer

Option C is correct: SPI = EV/PV = 0.9 (behind schedule), CPI = EV/AC = 0.82 (over budget). Option A incorrectly states on schedule. Option B incorrectly states on budget.

Option D misstates CPI.

Full explanation →

135

MCQhard

A project manager is leading a construction project. The critical path has a total float of zero. A key supplier notifies you that a critical component will be delayed by two weeks, which will push the project beyond its deadline. The risk was identified and a mitigation plan exists. What should the PM do NEXT?

A.Implement the mitigation plan from the risk register

B.Immediately escalate the issue to the project sponsor

C.Accept the delay and update the project schedule

D.Crash the schedule by adding resources to other tasks

AnswerA

The risk was identified, so the planned response should be executed.

Why this answer

Per PMI, when a risk occurs, the PM should implement the agreed-upon response plan. If that plan is not sufficient, then escalate. But the first step is to execute the mitigation.

Full explanation →

136

MCQmedium

A project manager is leading a cross-functional team where two key members have conflicting priorities. One member insists on following a strict process, while the other wants to expedite delivery. The project manager needs to resolve the conflict to keep the project on track. Which approach is most effective?

A.Enforce the strict process to ensure quality.

B.Suggest a compromise where both give up some requirements.

C.Facilitate a meeting to discuss both perspectives and find a solution that meets core needs.

D.Ignore the conflict and hope it resolves itself.

AnswerC

Collaborating/confronting aims for a win-win and is the recommended approach.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because facilitating a meeting to discuss both perspectives aligns with the PMP's 'Manage Conflict' process under the 'People' domain. This collaborative approach, known as 'collaborating' or 'problem-solving,' seeks a win-win solution that addresses the core needs of both team members—ensuring quality while meeting delivery timelines—without forcing a compromise that dilutes value or ignoring the issue.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often choose Option B (compromise) as a 'fair' middle ground, but the PMP exam emphasizes that compromise (lose-lose) is less effective than collaboration (win-win) for resolving conflicts in high-stakes projects.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because enforcing the strict process unilaterally disregards the other member's priority of expediting delivery, which can lead to resentment, reduced collaboration, and potential project delays if the process is overly rigid. Option B is wrong because suggesting a compromise where both give up some requirements may result in a suboptimal solution that fails to fully satisfy either core need, potentially compromising quality or delivery speed without addressing the root conflict. Option D is wrong because ignoring the conflict and hoping it resolves itself is a passive approach that typically escalates tensions, leading to team dysfunction, missed milestones, and increased project risk.

Full explanation →

137

MCQeasy

In a Scrum project, the product owner asks the team to add a new user story during the sprint. The team is currently working on committed stories. What should the Scrum Master do?

A.Immediately schedule a sprint planning meeting to add the new story

B.Explain to the product owner that new stories cannot be added during the sprint without removing an equal amount of work

C.Add the story to the sprint backlog and ask the team to work overtime

D.Tell the team to finish current stories first and then work on the new story

AnswerB

Scrum allows changes only if the sprint backlog is adjusted by swapping stories of similar size, with team agreement.

Why this answer

In Scrum, the sprint backlog is fixed once the sprint starts. The product owner can add new stories only after the current sprint is completed, unless a story is swapped out with equal effort. The Scrum Master should protect the team from scope changes during the sprint.

Full explanation →

138

MCQmedium

A key stakeholder on your project has been sending emails directly to team members, bypassing you as the project manager. This has caused confusion, as team members are receiving conflicting instructions. What should you do FIRST?

A.Meet with the stakeholder to discuss the communication channels and reinforce the project's governance structure

B.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor and request that the stakeholder be removed from the project

C.Instruct the team to ignore any requests from the stakeholder that have not been approved by you

D.Submit a change request to update the communications management plan

AnswerA

Open communication with the stakeholder can resolve misunderstandings and reinforce the PM's role.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because the PM should address the issue directly with the stakeholder to clarify communication channels. Option A is wrong because instructing the team to ignore the stakeholder may damage the relationship. Option C is wrong because escalating to the sponsor should be a last resort.

Option D is wrong because this is a communication issue, not a change control issue.

Full explanation →

139

MCQhard

An executive stakeholder bypasses the project manager and directly assigns work to a team member. The team member is now overloaded and missing sprint commitments. What should the project manager do first?

A.Escalate to the sponsor about the executive's interference.

B.Meet with the executive stakeholder to explain the impact and request that all work requests go through the project manager.

C.Update the risk register and monitor for further occurrences.

D.Assign the extra work to another team member to balance the load.

AnswerB

Why this answer

The correct first step is to discuss the issue with the executive stakeholder privately to reinforce the project governance and communication protocols. This is proactive and respectful. Option A escalates prematurely.

Option C ignores the root cause. Option D is reactive and does not address the bypassing behavior.

Full explanation →

140

Multi-Selectmedium

You are the PM for a highway construction project. A key vendor informs you that they cannot deliver the steel beams on time due to a factory fire. This risk was identified in the risk register with a mitigation plan to have a backup supplier. However, the backup supplier's price is 20% higher. Which TWO actions should you take?

Select 2 answers

A.Inform the sponsor about the cost increase and request a budget adjustment

B.Add the vendor's failure to the risk register as a new risk

C.Authorize the team to source alternative materials locally

D.Execute the contingency plan and engage the backup supplier

E.Update the project management plan to use a different construction method

AnswersA, D

Stakeholders need to be informed of cost impacts.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the contingency plan (backup supplier) should be executed. Option B is correct because the cost variance needs to be communicated and addressed. Option C is wrong because changing the plan without review is not appropriate.

Option D is wrong because switching to a different material requires change control. Option E is wrong because the risk occurred; it is not a new risk.

Full explanation →

141

MCQmedium

A team member consistently misses deadlines, causing delays in the project. The project manager has had informal conversations with the team member, but the issue persists. What is the BEST next step?

A.Reassign the team member to a less critical task to minimize impact

B.Escalate the issue to the team member's functional manager immediately

C.Schedule a private meeting with the team member to discuss the issue, identify root causes, and create a performance improvement plan with clear expectations

D.Remove the team member from the project and replace them with a more reliable resource

AnswerC

Direct communication and collaborative problem-solving is the best approach.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because the PM should address the issue directly and collaboratively, documenting it to track progress. Option B is passive. Option C escalates prematurely without a documented issue.

Option D is punitive without understanding the root cause.

Full explanation →

142

MCQhard

During a construction project, you discover that a subcontractor has delivered materials that do not meet the quality specifications outlined in the contract. The project is already behind schedule, and replacing the materials will cause further delays. You have a good relationship with the subcontractor, who offers a discount on future work if you accept the materials as-is. What should you do FIRST?

A.Reject the materials and request that the subcontractor replace them according to the contract specifications.

B.Issue a change order to modify the quality specifications to match the delivered materials.

C.Accept the materials and the discount to maintain the relationship and avoid further delays.

D.Inspect the materials yourself and if they appear safe, accept them to save time.

AnswerA

The project manager must uphold quality standards and contract terms; the subcontractor is obligated to deliver conforming materials.

Why this answer

Quality requirements are part of the contract and must be met. Accepting non-conforming materials would violate quality standards and could lead to future failures. The PM should follow the contract terms and require the subcontractor to remediate the issue.

Negotiating a discount is not acceptable as it compromises quality.

Full explanation →

143

MCQmedium

You are the project manager for a marketing campaign launch. The project has a tight deadline. During a status meeting, a team member announces that they have completed a task two days early. However, you notice that the quality of the deliverable is below the acceptance criteria. What should you do?

A.Thank the team member for the early completion and move on to the next task

B.Reject the deliverable and ask the team member to rework it to meet the acceptance criteria

C.Lower the acceptance criteria to match the deliverable's quality to save time

D.Accept the deliverable since it was completed early and the team can improve it later

AnswerB

The PM should ensure deliverables meet quality standards. Rework is necessary even if it impacts the schedule.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because the deliverable does not meet quality standards, and the PM should reject it and request rework. Option A is wrong because accepting substandard work sets a bad precedent. Option B is wrong because the PM should not accept defects.

Option C is wrong because reducing quality standards without stakeholder approval violates the project scope.

Full explanation →

144

MCQmedium

A key vendor informs you that they will be unable to deliver a critical component on time due to a production issue. This component is on the critical path. What should the project manager do FIRST?

A.File a claim against the vendor for breach of contract.

B.Update the risk register and inform the sponsor about the delay.

C.Analyze the impact on the project schedule and explore mitigation options such as fast-tracking or alternate suppliers.

D.Immediately find a new vendor to deliver the component.

AnswerC

This is the recommended proactive response: analyze, then act.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the immediate priority when a critical path component is delayed is to analyze the schedule impact and identify mitigation options (e.g., fast-tracking, crashing, or alternative suppliers) before escalating or taking contractual action. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's iterative risk response process, where the project manager must first assess the situation and determine feasible corrective actions to minimize schedule variance.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'immediate escalation' (updating the risk register or informing the sponsor) with the correct first step of 'analyze and mitigate' — PMI expects the project manager to take proactive, analytical action before communicating upward or taking legal steps.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because filing a claim for breach of contract is a reactive legal step that should only be considered after exhausting mitigation options and assessing the actual impact; it is not the first action per the PMI's conflict resolution hierarchy. Option B is wrong because updating the risk register and informing the sponsor without first analyzing the impact and exploring mitigations violates the principle of 'analyze before escalate' — the risk register update should reflect the analysis outcome, not precede it. Option D is wrong because immediately finding a new vendor without first analyzing the schedule impact and exploring fast-tracking or crashing could introduce new risks (e.g., qualification delays, quality issues) and is not the systematic first step prescribed by the PMBOK Guide's risk response process.

Full explanation →

145

MCQmedium

A key vendor notifies you that they cannot deliver a critical component for another three weeks. This component is on the critical path. You have identified this risk in the risk register with a contingency plan to use a backup supplier. What should you do FIRST?

A.Escalate the issue to the project sponsor immediately

B.Conduct a new risk assessment for the vendor delay

C.Add a 3-week buffer to the project schedule to absorb the delay

D.Execute the contingency plan by contacting the backup supplier and updating the project schedule and budget accordingly

AnswerD

The PM should implement the pre-planned response to minimize impact.

Why this answer

Option D is correct because the risk has occurred (an issue), so the PM should implement the contingency plan as per the risk register. Option A is wrong because the PM should follow the plan, not add new buffer unnecessarily. Option B is wrong because starting a new risk assessment delays action.

Option C is wrong because escalation is not needed if a plan exists.

Full explanation →

146

MCQmedium

Your project's earned value analysis shows CPI = 0.85 and SPI = 0.90. The project is behind schedule and over budget. Several stakeholders are concerned about the viability of the project. What is the BEST course of action?

A.Request additional budget from the sponsor to cover the overrun.

B.Conduct a variance analysis, identify root causes, and present a recovery plan to stakeholders.

C.Reduce scope by removing lower-priority features to cut costs.

D.Re-baseline the project schedule and cost to reflect current performance.

AnswerB

This is the proactive, analytical approach PMI recommends to address performance issues.

Why this answer

With negative cost and schedule variances, the project manager should analyze root causes, develop a recovery plan, and submit a change request if needed. Updating the project management plan and communicating transparently with stakeholders is key.

Full explanation →

147

Multi-Selectmedium

Your project is experiencing scope creep due to informal requests from stakeholders. The project manager wants to establish better control. Which TWO actions should the project manager take?

Select 2 answers

A.Politely decline all additional requests from stakeholders

B.Increase the project budget to accommodate potential changes

C.Ask the team to accommodate small requests without documentation if they are low effort

D.Implement a formal change control process and educate stakeholders on how to submit change requests

E.Review and update the scope management plan to clarify how changes will be handled

AnswersD, E

A formal process with stakeholder education helps manage changes properly.

Why this answer

Options B and E are correct: implementing a formal change control process and updating the scope management plan are proactive steps to control scope.

Full explanation →

148

MCQmedium

You are managing a software development project using a hybrid approach. During a sprint review, the customer expresses dissatisfaction with a recently delivered feature and requests a significant redesign. This change will impact the critical path and increase costs. What should you do FIRST?

A.Approve the redesign to satisfy the customer and update the project schedule accordingly

B.Instruct the team to implement the redesign immediately to maintain customer satisfaction

C.Submit a change request to the change control board (CCB) for evaluation and approval

D.Reject the request because it was not part of the original scope agreement

AnswerC

Following the change control process allows for impact analysis and informed decision-making.

Why this answer

PMI requires that any change impacting scope, schedule, or cost must go through the formal change control process. Submitting a change request ensures proper evaluation and approval before any work begins.

Full explanation →

149

Multi-Selecthard

A key vendor informs you that they cannot deliver a critical component on time, which will delay the project. You need to decide on next steps. Which THREE actions are most appropriate?

Select 3 answers

A.Update the project management plan with the new delivery date

B.Ask the team to work overtime to compensate for the delay

C.Notify the project sponsor and other key stakeholders of the delay and potential impacts

D.Immediately terminate the vendor contract

E.Evaluate the impact on the project schedule and critical path

AnswersA, C, E

The plan should be updated after assessing impact.

Why this answer

Updating the project management plan with the new delivery date is correct because it formally documents the revised schedule baseline, which is a key output of the integrated change control process. This ensures all project artifacts reflect the current reality, enabling accurate tracking and communication. Without this update, the plan becomes obsolete and misaligns with actual project execution.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates mistakenly treat 'asking the team to work overtime' as a valid corrective action without recognizing it requires a formal change request and impact analysis, or they assume terminating the vendor contract is the first step instead of evaluating the schedule impact first.

Full explanation →

150

MCQmedium

During a sprint retrospective, a team member complains that the daily standups are too long and unproductive. Several others agree. What is the BEST action for the Scrum Master to take?

A.Enforce a strict 15-minute timebox for future standups

B.Cancel the daily standups and replace them with written status reports

C.Move the standup to a later time when team members are more focused

D.Ask the team to propose improvements to the standup format and agree on changes

AnswerD

This empowers the team to find a solution that works for them, fostering ownership.

Why this answer

The retrospective is the appropriate place to discuss process improvements. The Scrum Master should facilitate a discussion to modify the standup format based on the team's feedback.

Full explanation →

Page 2 of 12

All pages

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Practice PMP by domain

Target a specific domain to shore up weak areas.

People — Leading Projects Process — Managing Technical Aspects Business Environment — Strategy and Value Business Environment: strategy and project benefits

See all domains with question counts →