During a build vs. buy analysis, the IS auditor observes that the organization decided to build a custom application because no vendor solution met all requirements. Which of the following risks should the auditor emphasize?
Building custom software demands staffing, tooling and iterative testing that vendor licensing avoids, so delivery slips and budgets overrun — directly satisfying the stem's build-versus-buy constraint. The auditor should emphasise that no vendor solution met all requirements, meaning bespoke development absorbs the full cost and schedule risk internally.
Why this answer
When an organization chooses to build a custom application instead of buying a vendor solution, the primary risks shift from external dependencies to internal development challenges. Building custom software typically requires significant upfront investment in time, skilled personnel, and financial resources, and it often takes longer to deliver than implementing an existing product. Therefore, the auditor should emphasize increased time-to-market and development costs as the key risk in this scenario.
Exam trap
CISA often tests the ability to distinguish between risks associated with building versus buying software; candidates may incorrectly associate vendor-related risks like lock-in or external support dependence with custom development, when in fact the primary risks of building are internal, such as increased time-to-market and development costs.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because lack of customization is actually a risk of buying a vendor solution, not building one; custom-built applications are inherently customizable. Option B is wrong because dependence on external support is a risk associated with purchasing vendor software, where the organization relies on the vendor for updates and fixes, whereas building in-house reduces external support dependence. Option C is wrong because vendor lock-in occurs when an organization is tied to a specific vendor's proprietary technology, which is a risk of buying, not building; building custom avoids vendor lock-in but introduces other risks.