Question 499 of 503
Business Analysis FrameworkshardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is stakeholder availability, level of detail required, and the nature of the information needed. These three factors are foundational in the BABOK guide for selecting elicitation techniques because they directly determine whether a technique is both practical and effective. Stakeholder availability dictates who can participate and when, while the level of detail required guides whether you need a broad overview from a brainstorming session or precise specifications from a document analysis. On the CAPM exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish logistical constraints from technique outputs; a common trap is confusing “stakeholder availability” with “stakeholder influence” or picking “cost of the technique” which, while relevant, is not one of the three primary BABOK factors. To remember the core trio, think of the mnemonic “SAN” — Stakeholder availability, level of detail required, and Nature of the information needed.

CAPM Business Analysis Frameworks Practice Question

This CAPM practice question tests your understanding of business analysis frameworks. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE factors should a business analyst consider when selecting an elicitation technique for a project?

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Availability of stakeholders

A is correct because stakeholder availability directly impacts the feasibility of scheduling and conducting elicitation activities such as interviews, workshops, or focus groups. If key stakeholders are unavailable, the chosen technique may be impractical or yield incomplete information, making this a primary logistical consideration in technique selection.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Availability of stakeholders

    Why this is correct

    Stakeholder availability influences technique choice (e.g., workshops vs surveys).

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Project manager's preference

    Why it's wrong here

    Selection should be based on project needs, not personal preference.

  • Type of information needed

    Why this is correct

    Different techniques elicit different types of information (process, data, rules).

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Cost of the technique

    Why it's wrong here

    Cost is secondary to effectiveness; technique selection focuses on fit.

  • Level of detail required

    Why this is correct

    Some techniques provide high-level overview, others detailed specifics.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'project manager's preference' or 'cost' as valid selection criteria, but the CAPM exam specifically tests the BABOK's three primary factors: stakeholder availability, type of information needed, and level of detail required.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The BABOK Guide (v3) specifies that elicitation technique selection should consider the type of information needed (e.g., requirements vs. stakeholder concerns), the level of detail required (e.g., high-level vs. granular), and stakeholder availability (e.g., time zones, schedules). For example, a document analysis might be chosen when stakeholders are unavailable, while a facilitated workshop is ideal when detailed consensus is needed but requires all key participants to be present. This ensures the technique aligns with the project's information needs and practical constraints.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CAPM exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related CAPM practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CAPM practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CAPM question test?

Business Analysis Frameworks — This question tests Business Analysis Frameworks — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Availability of stakeholders — A is correct because stakeholder availability directly impacts the feasibility of scheduling and conducting elicitation activities such as interviews, workshops, or focus groups. If key stakeholders are unavailable, the chosen technique may be impractical or yield incomplete information, making this a primary logistical consideration in technique selection.

What should I do if I get this CAPM question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More CAPM practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.