A manufacturer identifies a rare but very costly ransomware risk. Executives decide not to eliminate the activity, but to purchase cyber insurance and formally acknowledge the remaining exposure. Which risk treatment is being used?
Transfer shifts the financial burden of a potential loss to a third party, most commonly through a cyber insurance policy that covers ransomware payments, extortion demands, and business interruption costs. This strategy is especially appropriate for a rare but very costly risk because it converts an uncertain, potentially catastrophic loss into a predictable premium while allowing the manufacturer to continue operating. The organization still retains responsibility for incident response and reputation, but the financial impact is moved to the insurer.
Why this answer
(Transfer) because purchasing cyber insurance shifts the financial risk of the ransomware incident to the insurer. The executives formally acknowledge the remaining exposure, which confirms they are not simply accepting the risk but are actively transferring the monetary impact through a contractual agreement.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates confuse 'acceptance' with 'acknowledgment' — the phrase 'formally acknowledge the remaining exposure' is a red herring; true acceptance requires no further action, but purchasing insurance proves the risk is being transferred, not accepted.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A (Avoidance) is wrong because avoidance would require discontinuing the activity that introduces the ransomware risk, such as shutting down the affected systems or processes. Option C (Mitigation) is wrong because mitigation involves implementing technical controls (e.g., endpoint detection, backups, patching) to reduce the likelihood or impact of ransomware, not purchasing insurance. Option D (Acceptance) is wrong because acceptance means the organization consciously retains the risk without transferring or mitigating it; purchasing insurance demonstrates a transfer, not passive acceptance.