Question 307 of 1,152
Security Program Management and OversightmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is the board of directors, as they hold the ultimate fiduciary authority to approve security policy and budget at the highest governance level. This is because a $200,000 annual operational cost increase represents a significant financial commitment that directly impacts the organization’s risk posture and bottom line, requiring formal allocation from the group with final responsibility over strategic spending and compliance. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this concept tests your understanding of governance structures and the separation of duties—senior management or the CEO may recommend, but only the board can authorize major policy shifts with substantial budget implications. A common trap is choosing the CISO or security manager, who can propose but lack the financial authority to approve. Remember the mnemonic: “Big money, big authority—Board signs the check.”

SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security manager at a financial services company is proposing a new policy that would require annual background checks for all employees with access to sensitive customer payment data. The proposed policy, if implemented, would increase the organization's operational costs by approximately $200,000 per year. The manager needs to obtain formal approval to implement this policy. Which of the following groups is MOST likely to have the authority to approve this policy and allocate the necessary budget?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Board of directors

The board of directors holds the ultimate fiduciary responsibility and authority over significant financial commitments and strategic policy changes. A $200,000 annual cost increase requires approval at the highest governance level, as it impacts the organization's budget and risk posture. The board is the only group with the formal power to allocate such a substantial operational expense and approve a new policy affecting all employees with access to sensitive payment data.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Board of directors

    Why this is correct

    The board of directors has the fiduciary responsibility and ultimate authority to approve significant policy changes that require a substantial budget allocation, such as a $200,000 annual expense for background checks. This is correct because the policy crosses functional areas (security, HR, finance) and requires formal governance approval.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)

    Why it's wrong here

    While the CISO is the senior security leader and may champion the policy, the CISO typically does not have the sole authority to approve a multi-departmental policy that costs $200,000 and involves HR processes. The CISO would recommend the policy to higher governance bodies such as the board or executive committee.

  • IT steering committee

    Why it's wrong here

    An IT steering committee usually prioritizes technology projects and IT investments, but this policy is an HR/security policy that affects all employees, not just IT. The committee lacks the authority to approve enterprise-wide human resources policies and budget increases of this magnitude.

  • Security operations team

    Why it's wrong here

    The security operations team is responsible for day-to-day monitoring and incident response. They have no authority to approve policies or allocate budget. This option is clearly incorrect for a policy-level decision.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse operational authority (CISO) with financial governance authority (board), assuming the CISO can approve any security-related budget without recognizing that large, recurring costs require board-level approval.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In financial services, regulatory frameworks like PCI DSS and SOX mandate that access controls for sensitive customer data (e.g., primary account numbers) be reviewed annually, and any policy change with a material cost must be approved by the board to ensure compliance and risk acceptance. The board's approval also triggers formal documentation in meeting minutes, which serves as evidence for auditors. This process aligns with the NIST SP 800-53 control family for governance and risk management, specifically RA-3 (Risk Assessment) and PM-9 (Risk Management Strategy).

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Board of directors — The board of directors holds the ultimate fiduciary responsibility and authority over significant financial commitments and strategic policy changes. A $200,000 annual cost increase requires approval at the highest governance level, as it impacts the organization's budget and risk posture. The board is the only group with the formal power to allocate such a substantial operational expense and approve a new policy affecting all employees with access to sensitive payment data.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.