Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped
Procurement is reviewing a new payroll SaaS provider. The business wants independent evidence that the vendor's controls were designed and operating effectively over the last six months. Which document should the security team request?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Best answer
A SOC 2 Type II report from an independent auditor.
A SOC 2 Type II report is designed to show both the design and operating effectiveness of controls over a period of time. That makes it especially useful for assessing an ongoing SaaS provider relationship. It gives procurement and security an independent assurance artifact that can support vendor due diligence and third-party risk review.
B
Distractor review
A software patch list showing recent updates installed on the vendor's servers.
A patch list may show maintenance activity, but it does not provide independent assurance about the control environment or whether controls worked effectively over time.
C
Distractor review
A penetration test screenshot showing one web application vulnerability was fixed.
A single penetration test finding is too narrow to evaluate a vendor's overall control posture. It does not demonstrate control effectiveness over a multi-month period.
D
Distractor review
An internal email from the vendor's security manager stating that controls are mature.
Self-assertions are not independent evidence. Procurement needs assurance from a third party or a formal control report, not a subjective statement from the vendor.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic
NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
- PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
- Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
- NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.
TExam Day Tips
- Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
- Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
- Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: A SOC 2 Type II report from an independent auditor. — A SOC 2 Type II report is the strongest choice because it provides independent assurance that a service provider's controls were both suitably designed and operating effectively over a period of time. For a payroll SaaS vendor, that matters because the organization is relying on the provider to protect sensitive employee data and process transactions securely. The report helps reduce third-party risk by giving measurable, audited evidence rather than vendor self-reporting. Why others are wrong: A patch list only shows maintenance actions and does not prove control effectiveness. A penetration test screenshot covers a single issue and does not represent the vendor's overall environment. An internal email is just a self-claim and offers no independent verification. The scenario asks for evidence of controls over the last six months, which points directly to a time-based assurance report.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.