mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A project team identifies a new risk with a high likelihood of minor data exposure during a pilot rollout. The impact is low, but the issue would become harder to address after production launch. The business owner wants the project to proceed. What should the risk owner do NEXT?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A project team identifies a new risk with a high likelihood of minor data exposure during a pilot rollout. The impact is low, but the issue would become harder to address after production launch. The business owner wants the project to proceed. What should the risk owner do NEXT?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Ignore the issue because the impact is low.

Low impact does not mean no action. A high-likelihood issue should still be recorded and treated appropriately.

B

Best answer

Document the risk, assign an owner, and escalate for acceptance or treatment before launch.

This is the best next step because the risk is both identified and still manageable during the pilot. Recording it in the risk register, assigning accountability, and escalating it for acceptance or treatment ensures management makes an informed decision. Since the issue will be harder to fix after production launch, early action is important. This is classic risk governance: identify, document, assign, and decide before exposure expands.

C

Distractor review

Wait until after production launch to see whether the issue actually occurs.

Waiting increases the chance the organization will inherit a harder and more expensive problem later in the lifecycle.

D

Distractor review

Transfer the risk by moving the pilot to a different business unit.

Changing ownership inside the organization does not remove the underlying risk. The exposure still needs formal treatment or acceptance.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Document the risk, assign an owner, and escalate for acceptance or treatment before launch. — The risk owner should document the issue, assign responsibility, and escalate it for a formal decision before production launch. Because the likelihood is high and remediation becomes harder later, the organization needs an informed choice now about acceptance, mitigation, or another treatment. This preserves accountability and prevents the risk from becoming an untracked problem after launch. Good risk management depends on timely visibility and documented decisions. Why others are wrong: Ignoring the issue is not appropriate just because the impact is low; likelihood matters too. Waiting until after launch can turn a manageable risk into a costly operational problem. Moving the pilot to another business unit does not transfer the actual exposure; it only relocates responsibility. The right move is formal documentation and escalation so leadership can decide how to treat the risk.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.