Question 1,243 of 1,731
Overview of PRINCE2 and PrincipleshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct recommendation is to request the project board to review and update the business case immediately, and if it is no longer viable, recommend stopping the project. This is because the PRINCE2 continued business justification principle demands that the business case remains valid and the project’s benefits remain achievable throughout its lifecycle; when the senior user flags that market conditions have changed and expected benefits are at risk, the project manager must escalate for an immediate review rather than relying on sunk costs to justify continuation. On the PRINCE2 Foundation exam, this principle is frequently tested through scenarios where a stakeholder argues for continuing based on past investment—a classic trap that confuses sunk costs with ongoing viability. The key memory tip is “justify or stop”: the business case must be reviewed at every stage boundary, and if justification fails, the project must be stopped, regardless of resources already spent.

PRINCE2F Overview of PRINCE2 and Principles Practice Question

This PRINCE2F practice question tests your understanding of overview of prince2 and principles. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

You are the project manager for a large-scale IT infrastructure project for a multinational corporation. The project involves deploying new servers across 20 countries, with a budget of $5 million and a timeline of 18 months. The project has been running for 6 months and is currently in its second stage. The project board consists of the executive, senior user, and senior supplier. Recently, the senior user has been raising concerns that the project is not delivering the expected benefits, and the business case may no longer be viable due to changes in market conditions. The senior supplier argues that the project should continue because significant resources have already been invested. The executive is undecided. As the project manager, you need to advise the project board on the best course of action based on PRINCE2 principles. Which of the following should you recommend?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full NAT/PAT explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Request the project board to review and update the business case immediately. If it is no longer viable, recommend stopping the project.

B is correct because PRINCE2's continued business justification principle requires that the business case remain viable throughout the project. As project manager, you must escalate to the project board for an immediate review when the senior user raises concerns about benefits and market changes. If the business case is no longer viable, the project should be stopped to avoid further waste of resources, regardless of sunk costs.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Postpone the decision until the end of the current stage to conduct a full review.

    Why it's wrong here

    While stage reviews are important, the business case should be reviewed as soon as concerns arise.

  • Request the project board to review and update the business case immediately. If it is no longer viable, recommend stopping the project.

    Why this is correct

    This aligns with the continued business justification principle.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Tailor the continued business justification principle to allow the project to continue due to its strategic importance.

    Why it's wrong here

    Principles cannot be tailored; they are universal and must be applied.

  • Continue with the project as planned because significant investment has already been made.

    Why it's wrong here

    This ignores the continued business justification principle; sunk costs should not justify continuation.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the 'manage by stages' principle with delaying decisions, or they incorrectly believe that tailoring can override a fundamental principle like continued business justification.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Under PRINCE2, the business case is a living document owned by the executive and must be reviewed at least at each stage boundary, but also whenever a threat to viability emerges. The project manager triggers an exception report if the business case is forecast to fail, prompting the project board to decide. In this scenario, the senior user's concerns about market conditions represent a change in the external environment that directly impacts the cost-benefit analysis, requiring immediate board-level action.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A small business has 20 workstations on the 192.168.1.0/24 network and one public IP from its ISP. The router uses PAT (NAT overload) so all 20 devices share one public address using different source ports. NAT questions test whether you understand the four address terms and which direction each translation applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PRINCE2F practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PRINCE2F practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PRINCE2F question test?

Overview of PRINCE2 and Principles — This question tests Overview of PRINCE2 and Principles — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Request the project board to review and update the business case immediately. If it is no longer viable, recommend stopping the project. — B is correct because PRINCE2's continued business justification principle requires that the business case remain viable throughout the project. As project manager, you must escalate to the project board for an immediate review when the senior user raises concerns about benefits and market changes. If the business case is no longer viable, the project should be stopped to avoid further waste of resources, regardless of sunk costs.

What should I do if I get this PRINCE2F question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on PRINCE2F

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A project manager is reviewing the business case for a new software development project. The project is expected to generate significant revenue, but the initial investment is high. According to PRINCE2, which principle is MOST directly being applied when the project manager ensures that the business case remains viable throughout the project?

medium
  • A.Manage by stages
  • B.Learn from experience
  • C.Continued business justification
  • D.Tailor to suit the project environment

Why C: The PRINCE2 principle of Continued Business Justification requires that the business case, which documents the project's justification, is reviewed and updated at key decision points (e.g., stage boundaries) to ensure the project remains viable. In this scenario, the project manager is actively verifying that the high initial investment is still justified by the expected revenue, directly applying this principle to avoid proceeding with an unviable project.

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PRINCE2F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PRINCE2F exam.