Question 494 of 503
Business Analysis FrameworksmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct choice is to work with the product owner to break down large stories into smaller ones with clear acceptance criteria. This directly resolves the core issues of Agile story sizing and acceptance criteria, because stories that are too large to complete in a sprint lack the granularity needed for incremental delivery, and without acceptance criteria the team has no shared definition of "done," leading to wasted effort and no demonstrable functionality. On the Certified Associate in Project Management CAPM exam, this scenario tests your understanding of how proper story decomposition and acceptance criteria drive sprint delivery success; a common trap is choosing to lengthen the sprint, which avoids the root cause of poor story quality. Remember the memory tip: "Big stories without criteria are just wish lists—slice them small and define 'done' to demo each sprint."

CAPM Business Analysis Frameworks Practice Question

This CAPM practice question tests your understanding of business analysis frameworks. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A business analyst is working on a project to implement a new human resources software. The project is using an Agile framework with two-week sprints. After three sprints, the product owner is frustrated because the team has not delivered any working functionality that can be demoed. The business analyst realizes that the user stories lack acceptance criteria and are too large to complete in a sprint. The team is also spending too much time on documentation. As the business analyst, what should you do to improve the situation?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Work with the product owner to break down large stories into smaller ones with clear acceptance criteria.

Option B is correct because decomposing stories and adding acceptance criteria improves clarity and delivery. Option A ignores root causes. Option C lengthens sprints but doesn't fix story quality. Option D avoids the real issue.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Replace the product owner with a more experienced one who understands Agile.

    Why it's wrong here

    Changing roles is drastic and may not resolve the immediate issue.

  • Reduce documentation requirements to free up more development time.

    Why it's wrong here

    Less documentation might help but doesn't fix the core problem of story size and clarity.

  • Work with the product owner to break down large stories into smaller ones with clear acceptance criteria.

    Why this is correct

    Smaller stories with acceptance criteria are easier to estimate and demonstrate.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Increase the sprint duration to four weeks to allow more time for completion.

    Why it's wrong here

    Longer sprints may reduce feedback frequency but don't address story sizing or acceptance criteria.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the CAPM exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which CAPM exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related CAPM practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free CAPM practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this CAPM question test?

Business Analysis Frameworks — This question tests Business Analysis Frameworks — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Work with the product owner to break down large stories into smaller ones with clear acceptance criteria. — Option B is correct because decomposing stories and adding acceptance criteria improves clarity and delivery. Option A ignores root causes. Option C lengthens sprints but doesn't fix story quality. Option D avoids the real issue.

What should I do if I get this CAPM question wrong?

Identify which CAPM exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.