An organization wants to ensure that its IT services meet the agreed performance levels. Which practice is primarily responsible for negotiating and monitoring these targets?
Service Level Management handles SLAs and monitoring of service levels.
Why this answer
Service Level Management (SLM) is the ITIL practice responsible for negotiating, agreeing, and documenting service level targets (SLTs) in Service Level Agreements (SLAs), and then monitoring and reporting on actual performance against those targets. This ensures IT services consistently meet the agreed performance levels by establishing clear expectations and providing a framework for continuous improvement.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse Capacity and Performance Management (which monitors performance metrics) with Service Level Management (which negotiates and owns the targets), leading them to select D instead of C.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because Availability Management focuses specifically on ensuring IT services are available when needed, managing risks to availability, and reporting on availability metrics, but it does not negotiate or monitor the broader set of performance targets (e.g., response times, throughput) that SLM handles. Option B is wrong because Supplier Management manages relationships with external suppliers, negotiating contracts and monitoring supplier performance, but it does not directly negotiate or monitor the end-to-end service performance targets for internal IT services. Option D is wrong because Capacity and Performance Management ensures that IT services have sufficient capacity to meet current and future demand and monitors performance metrics, but it does not negotiate SLTs or own the SLA process; it provides input to SLM.