ITIL4F ITIL Management Practices Practice Question
Which THREE are types of changes in Change Enablement?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Normal
ITIL 4 defines three change types: Normal (assessed and authorized via change advisory board), Emergency (urgent, expedited), and Standard (pre-approved, low risk). Options A, C, and D are correct. Option B (Urgent) is not an official type; Emergency is. Option E (Minor) is not a separate type.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Normal
Why this is correct
Normal changes are non-pre-approved changes that must follow a full, structured change process, including assessment, authorization, and scheduling, to ensure minimal risk and impact. These changes typically require a change authority's approval based on a thorough evaluation of their potential effects on services and infrastructure. They are scheduled and implemented according to a defined change calendar, balancing speed with stability. This category encompasses most significant service improvements or infrastructure modifications.
- ✗
Urgent
Why it's wrong here
While changes often carry a sense of urgency, "Urgent" is not a recognized type of change within the ITIL 4 framework for change enablement. ITIL 4 categorizes changes based on their risk, approval requirements, and speed of implementation, rather than simply their perceived urgency. The framework uses "Emergency changes" to address situations demanding immediate action, which inherently implies high urgency, but "Urgent" itself is not a distinct classification.
- ✓
Emergency
Why this is correct
Emergency changes are implemented with the highest priority to resolve critical incidents, apply security patches, or address other urgent issues that could severely impact business operations if delayed. These changes often bypass some standard assessment and approval steps to expedite resolution, with authorization typically granted by an emergency change authority. Post-implementation reviews and retrospective approval are common to ensure proper documentation and minimize future risks.
- ✓
Standard
Why this is correct
Standard changes are low-risk, pre-authorized changes that are well-understood, fully documented, and do not require additional authorization before implementation. These are routine service requests or operational tasks, such as password resets or software installations, where the procedure is clear and the outcome predictable. Their pre-approval allows for efficient execution, streamlining common activities and reducing the burden on change authorities.
- ✗
Minor
Why it's wrong here
"Minor" is not an official or recognized classification for types of changes within the ITIL 4 change enablement practice. While changes can vary in scale and impact, ITIL 4 categorizes them primarily into Standard, Normal, and Emergency based on their risk, approval process, and urgency, rather than simply their perceived magnitude. Even small changes must fall into one of these three formal categories to ensure appropriate governance and control.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 531 original ITIL4F practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This ITIL4F practice question is part of Courseiva's free PeopleCert certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ITIL4F exam.