An organization is deploying a HyperFlex cluster for a database workload requiring low latency and high IOPS. Which node type should be selected?
All-flash nodes deliver the best performance for high IOPS and low latency.
Why this answer
All-flash nodes use only SSDs for both caching and persistent storage, delivering the lowest latency and highest IOPS required for demanding database workloads. In a HyperFlex cluster, all-flash configurations eliminate the rotational latency of HDDs, ensuring consistent sub-millisecond response times critical for OLTP databases.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that hybrid nodes are sufficient for 'high performance' workloads, but the specific requirement for 'low latency and high IOPS' explicitly demands all-flash nodes to avoid HDD bottlenecks.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because hybrid HDD/SSD nodes use HDDs for capacity storage, which introduces higher latency and lower IOPS compared to all-flash, making them unsuitable for low-latency database workloads. Option C is wrong because compute-only nodes lack local storage and rely on remote storage from other nodes, adding network latency that defeats the low-latency requirement. Option D is wrong because Witness VM nodes provide only quorum and cluster management functions, not data storage or compute resources, so they cannot contribute to IOPS or latency performance.