A data center engineer is designing a Fibre Channel SAN for high availability. The design includes two MDS 9710 directors connected to multiple storage arrays. Which best practice should be followed when configuring NPV mode on the switches connecting the hosts?
Dual-homing ensures high availability.
Why this answer
Dual-homing each NPV switch to two separate core switches ensures that if one core switch fails, the NPV switch can still forward traffic through the other core switch. In NPV mode, the switch acts as a passthrough, and connecting to two separate core directors provides path redundancy without requiring the NPV switch to perform full Fibre Channel routing. This design aligns with high-availability best practices for Fibre Channel SANs.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that FC trunking alone provides redundancy, but trunking only increases bandwidth and link aggregation, not failover independence; dual-homing to separate core switches is required for true high availability.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because VSAN interop is not a feature of NPV mode; NPV switches inherit the VSAN configuration from the core switch and do not need interop enabled to support multiple storage arrays. Option B is wrong because connecting each NPV switch to a single core switch creates a single point of failure, violating high-availability design principles. Option C is wrong because FC trunking is used to aggregate multiple physical links into a single logical link for bandwidth, but it does not provide the necessary redundancy; dual-homing is the correct method for redundancy.