A company recently deployed Cisco UCS B-Series blades with a single Fabric Interconnect. During a maintenance window, the Fabric Interconnect must be upgraded. Which action ensures minimal disruption to running workloads?
Blades continue running; only management connectivity is lost temporarily.
Why this answer
Option A is correct because disassociating service profiles from the blades detaches the logical configuration from the physical hardware, allowing the single Fabric Interconnect to be upgraded without affecting the running workloads. The blades continue to run their current operating system and applications, and once the upgrade is complete, re-associating the service profiles restores management connectivity without requiring a reboot or workload interruption.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that shutting down blades or migrating to a second Fabric Interconnect is required, but the key is that disassociating service profiles decouples management from the running workload, enabling a non-disruptive upgrade on a single Fabric Interconnect.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option B is wrong because migrating service profiles to a second Fabric Interconnect requires a second Fabric Interconnect to be present, but the scenario specifies a single Fabric Interconnect, making this option technically impossible. Option C is wrong because shutting down all blades gracefully causes a complete outage for all running workloads, which is not minimal disruption. Option D is wrong because changing the boot order to boot from an NFS image does not address the Fabric Interconnect upgrade; the blades still rely on the Fabric Interconnect for network connectivity, and the upgrade would disrupt that connectivity.