MPLS L3VPN

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (192.168.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (192.168.2.0/24). The PE routers are running OSPF with the CEs. On PE1, the VRF configuration includes route-target import and export 100:100. The show ip vrf detail command on PE1 shows the VRF is active, but the CE1 loopback is not present in the VRF routing table. The show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command on PE1 shows only directly connected interfaces. What is the most likely cause?

An engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers have MP-BGP peering and the VRF is configured with route-target import 100:100. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2 (the PE2 loopback), but the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command does not have this route. The show mpls forwarding-table on PE1 does not show a label for 192.168.1.2. What is the most likely cause?

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using OSPF with the CEs and MP-BGP between them. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route as well. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip cef vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0 command on PE1 shows the next-hop as 192.168.1.2 but the output interface is 'no route'. What is the most likely cause?

An engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers have MP-BGP peering and the VRF is configured with route-target import 100:100. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, but the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command does not have this route. The show ip bgp vpnv4 all 10.2.2.0/24 command on PE1 shows the route is received but not best. What is the most likely cause?

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using eBGP with the CEs. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip cef vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0 command on PE1 shows the next-hop as 192.168.1.2 and the output interface as GigabitEthernet0/0. The show mpls forwarding-table 192.168.1.2 detail command on PE1 shows a label but the outgoing interface is 'aggregate'. What is the most likely cause?

An engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using OSPF with the CEs. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip cef vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0 command on PE1 shows the next-hop as 192.168.1.2 and the output interface as GigabitEthernet0/0. The show ip route 192.168.1.2 command on PE1 shows the route with a next-hop of 10.0.0.2 and output interface GigabitEthernet0/0. The show mpls forwarding-table 192.168.1.2 detail command on PE1 shows a label with outgoing interface GigabitEthernet0/0. What is the most likely cause?

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using eBGP with the CEs. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0/24 command on PE1 shows the route is received and best, but the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0/24 neighbors 192.168.1.2 advertised-routes command on PE2 shows the route is not advertised. What is the most likely cause?

An engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using OSPF with the CEs. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip cef vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0 command on PE1 shows the next-hop as 192.168.1.2 and the output interface as GigabitEthernet0/0. The show mpls forwarding-table 192.168.1.2 detail command on PE1 shows a label with outgoing interface GigabitEthernet0/0. The show ip route 192.168.1.2 command on PE1 shows the route with a next-hop of 10.0.0.2 and output interface GigabitEthernet0/0. The show ip cef 192.168.1.2 command on PE1 shows the next-hop as 10.0.0.2 and output interface GigabitEthernet0/0. What is the most likely cause?

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (10.1.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (10.2.2.0/24). The PE routers are using eBGP with the CEs. On PE1, the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route for 10.2.2.0/24 with a next-hop of 192.168.1.2, and the show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command shows the route. However, traffic from CE1 to CE2 fails. The show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0/24 command on PE1 shows the route is received and best, but the show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER 10.2.2.0/24 command on PE1 also shows the route has the 'r' flag (RIB-failure). What is the most likely cause?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE1: PE1# show mpls forwarding-table 192.168.1.0 24 Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop Label Label or Tunnel Id Switched interface 16 Pop Label 192.168.1.0/24 0 Gi0/0 10.1.1.2 17 22 192.168.1.0/24 0 Gi0/1 10.2.2.2 Based on this output, which statement is correct?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE2: PE2# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER_A 10.10.10.0 24 BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.0/24, version 15 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUSTOMER_A) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local, imported path from 10.10.10.0/24 10.1.1.1 (metric 20) from 10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1) Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Extended Community: RT:100:100 mpls labels in/out 18/19 Based on this output, what is the problem?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router P1: P1# show mpls ldp neighbor Peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2:0, Local LDP Ident: 10.0.0.1:0 TCP connection: 10.0.0.2.646 - 10.0.0.1.48632 State: Oper, Msgs sent/rcvd: 120/118, Downstream Up time: 00:12:34 LDP discovery sources: GigabitEthernet0/0, Src IP addr: 10.1.1.2 Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2 192.168.1.1 Based on this output, which statement is correct?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router CE1: CE1# show ip route vrf CUSTOMER_B 10.20.20.0 24 Routing Table: CUSTOMER_B Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets B 10.20.20.0 [20/0] via 10.1.1.2, 00:02:34 Based on this output, what is the problem?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE3: PE3# show ip vrf interfaces Interface IP-Address VRF Protocol Gi0/0 10.1.1.1 CUSTOMER_C up Gi0/1 10.2.2.1 CUSTOMER_D up Based on this output, which statement is correct?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE4: PE4# show bgp vpnv4 unicast all summary BGP router identifier 10.0.0.4, local AS number 65001 BGP table version is 25, main routing table version 25 5 network prefixes using 640 bytes of memory 5 path entries using 400 bytes of memory 3/3 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 360 bytes of memory 1 BGP AS-PATH entries using 24 bytes of memory 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory 0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory BGP using 1424 total bytes of memory BGP activity 15/10 prefixes, 20/15 paths, scan interval 60 secs Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.0.0.5 4 65001 1020 1015 25 0 0 00:12:34 5 10.0.0.6 4 65002 500 495 25 0 0 00:06:20 0 Based on this output, what is the problem?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE5: PE5# show ip ospf neighbor Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 10.0.0.7 1 FULL/DR 00:00:32 10.1.1.7 GigabitEthernet0/0 10.0.0.8 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:35 10.2.2.8 GigabitEthernet0/1 Based on this output, which statement is correct?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE6: PE6# show mpls forwarding-table Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop Label Label or Tunnel Id Switched interface 16 Pop Label 10.0.0.1/32 0 Gi0/0 10.1.1.1 17 20 10.0.0.2/32 0 Gi0/1 10.2.2.2 18 Untagged 10.0.0.3/32 0 Gi0/2 10.3.3.3 Based on this output, what is the problem?

A network engineer runs the following command on Router PE7: PE7# show bgp vpnv4 unicast vrf CUSTOMER_E labels Network Next Hop In Label/Out Label 10.10.10.0/24 10.0.0.8 18/22 10.20.20.0/24 10.0.0.9 19/23 Based on this output, which statement is correct?

Examine the following partial configuration on a PE router: interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-A ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 65000 neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 192.168.1.1 update-source Loopback0 ! address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTOMER-A neighbor 10.1.1.2 remote-as 65001 neighbor 10.1.1.2 activate exit-address-family What is the effect of this configuration?

Consider the following configuration on a PE router: ip vrf CUSTOMER-B rd 100:1 route-target export 100:1 route-target import 100:2 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/2 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-B ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.252 What is the effect of this configuration?

A PE router has the following configuration: router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 update-source Loopback0 ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.0.0.1 activate neighbor 10.0.0.1 send-community extended exit-address-family What is wrong with this configuration?

Examine the following configuration on a PE router: ip vrf CUSTOMER-C rd 200:1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/3 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-C ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.252 ! router ospf 1 vrf CUSTOMER-C network 10.2.2.0 0.0.0.3 area 0 ! router bgp 65000 address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTOMER-C redistribute ospf 1 exit-address-family What is missing from this configuration?

A PE router has the following configuration: ip vrf CUSTOMER-D rd 300:1 route-target export 300:1 route-target import 300:1 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/4 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-D ip address 10.3.3.1 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 update-source Loopback0 ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.0.0.1 activate neighbor 10.0.0.1 send-community extended exit-address-family ! address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTOMER-D neighbor 10.3.3.2 remote-as 65002 neighbor 10.3.3.2 activate exit-address-family What is the effect of this configuration?

Examine the following configuration on a PE router: ip vrf CUSTOMER-E rd 400:1 route-target export 400:1 route-target import 400:2 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/5 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-E ip address 10.4.4.1 255.255.255.252 ! router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 update-source Loopback0 ! address-family vpnv4 neighbor 10.0.0.1 activate neighbor 10.0.0.1 send-community extended exit-address-family ! address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTOMER-E neighbor 10.4.4.2 remote-as 65003 neighbor 10.4.4.2 activate neighbor 10.4.4.2 route-map SET-COMMUNITY in exit-address-family ! route-map SET-COMMUNITY permit 10 set community 100:100 What is the effect of the route-map on the incoming routes from the CE?

In MPLS L3VPN, what is the purpose of the Route Distinguisher (RD)?

In MPLS L3VPN, what is the default behavior when a PE router receives a VPNv4 route with a Route Target that does not match any import RT on any VRF?

Which of the following statements about MPLS L3VPN label operations is true?

Which TWO commands can be used to verify the MPLS L3VPN label forwarding table on a PE router? (Choose TWO.)

Which TWO statements about route targets (RT) in MPLS L3VPN are true? (Choose TWO.)

Which THREE symptoms indicate a misconfiguration in the MPLS L3VPN control plane between two PEs? (Choose THREE.)

Which TWO configuration steps are required to enable MPLS L3VPN on a new PE router? (Choose TWO.)

Which THREE commands would a network engineer use to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue where a CE router cannot reach a remote CE? (Choose THREE.)

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# debug mpls ldp transport Output: *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: mpls_ldp_transport: LDP transport connection from 10.0.0.2:646 to 10.0.0.1:1025 *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: mpls_ldp_transport: LDP transport connection from 10.0.0.2:646 to 10.0.0.1:1025 is accepted *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: mpls_ldp_transport: LDP transport connection from 10.0.0.2:646 to 10.0.0.1:1025 is established *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: mpls_ldp_transport: LDP transport connection from 10.0.0.2:646 to 10.0.0.1:1025 is up What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to verify MPLS L3VPN operation: R1# show mpls ldp bindings Output: lib entry: 10.1.1.0/24, rev 2 local binding: label: 101 remote binding: lsr: 10.0.0.2:0, label: 201 lib entry: 10.2.2.0/24, rev 4 local binding: label: 102 remote binding: lsr: 10.0.0.2:0, label: 202 lib entry: 10.3.3.0/24, rev 6 local binding: label: 103 remote binding: lsr: 10.0.0.2:0, label: imp-null What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# show mpls ldp neighbor detail Output: Peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2:0, Local LDP Ident: 10.0.0.1:0 TCP connection: 10.0.0.2.646 - 10.0.0.1.17905 State: Oper, Msg sent: 123, Msg rcvd: 456 Up time: 1w2d LDP discovery sources: GigabitEthernet0/0, Src IP addr: 10.12.0.2 Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: 10.0.0.2 10.12.0.2 Peer hold time: 15 sec What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to verify MPLS L3VPN operation: R1# show ip route vrf CUSTOMER-A summary Output: Route Source Networks Subnets Overhead Memory (bytes) connected 2 0 48 288 static 1 0 24 144 ospf 100 5 2 168 1008 bgp 65000 10 3 312 1872 External: 10, Internal: 0, Local: 0 Total 18 5 552 3312 What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# show bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER-A 10.1.1.0/24 Output: BGP routing table entry for 10.1.1.0/24, version 10 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table CUSTOMER-A) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local 0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (10.0.0.1) Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best Extended Community: RT:100:100 mpls labels in/out nolabel/nolabel What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# debug ip bgp updates Output: *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: BGP(0): 10.0.0.2 UPDATE out w/ attr: nexthop 10.0.0.1, origin i, metric 0, path 65000, extended community RT:100:100 *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: BGP(0): 10.0.0.2 UPDATE out for 10.1.1.0/24 *Mar 1 00:01:23.456: BGP(0): 10.0.0.2 UPDATE run, update group 1 What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to verify MPLS L3VPN operation: R1# show bgp ipv4 unicast 10.1.1.0/24 Output: BGP routing table entry for 10.1.1.0/24, version 10 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local 0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (10.0.0.1) Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, best What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# show bgp neighbors 10.0.0.2 advertised-routes Output: BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.0.0.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.1.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 10.2.2.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i Total number of prefixes 2 What does this output indicate?

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN issue: R1# show bgp neighbors 10.0.0.2 received-routes Output: BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.0.0.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.3.3.0/24 10.0.0.2 0 100 0 65000 i *> 10.4.4.0/24 10.0.0.2 0 100 0 65000 i Total number of prefixes 2 What does this output indicate?

In an MPLS L3VPN environment using MP-BGP, what is the default value of the BGP keepalive timer on Cisco IOS-XE?

What is the default BGP hold timer value in an MPLS L3VPN deployment on Cisco IOS-XE?

In MPLS L3VPN, which LSA type is used by OSPF to advertise prefix information from a PE router into a customer VRF instance?

What is the default administrative distance for OSPF routes in a VRF when OSPF is used as the PE-CE routing protocol in MPLS L3VPN?

In MPLS L3VPN, what is the default behavior of BGP auto-summary on Cisco IOS-XE?

Which BGP path attribute is used as the tie-breaker after the local preference and AS-path length in the BGP best path selection algorithm?

In an MPLS L3VPN environment, what is the default maximum number of routes that can be installed from a single BGP peer?

What is the default BGP update timer (advertisement interval) for eBGP peers in Cisco IOS-XE?

In MPLS L3VPN, which OSPF network type is used by default on a Frame Relay point-to-point subinterface when OSPF is enabled?

Drag and drop the steps to set up a PE-CE BGP session in an MPLS L3VPN into the correct order, from first to last.

Drag and drop the steps to troubleshoot an MPLS L3VPN adjacency or connectivity failure into the correct order, from first to last.

Drag and drop the steps to verify and validate the MPLS L3VPN operational state into the correct order, from first to last.

Which TWO statements about the interaction between MP-BGP and the VRF routing table in an MPLS L3VPN PE router are correct? (Choose TWO.)

An engineer must prevent a VRF on a PE router from learning routes from a specific remote site in an MPLS L3VPN. Which TWO configuration changes on the local PE can achieve this? (Choose TWO.)

Which TWO statements about the 'show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf <vrf-name>' command output are correct? (Choose TWO.)

Which TWO statements about the use of 'mpls ldp autoconfig' in an MPLS L3VPN environment are true? (Choose TWO.)

Which THREE commands can be used to verify the MPLS label assigned to a specific prefix in a VRF on a PE router? (Choose THREE.)

An engineer configures OSPF between two PE routers in an MPLS L3VPN backbone. Both routers are directly connected via a GigabitEthernet link. The OSPF adjacency forms and then repeatedly flaps between FULL and EXSTART. The engineer verifies that both routers have matching OSPF network types (broadcast), matching area IDs, and no authentication mismatch. What is the most likely cause of the flapping?

An engineer configures EIGRP named mode on two routers in an MPLS L3VPN. The routers are directly connected and can ping each other. The engineer notices that the EIGRP adjacency forms but then the neighbor relationship goes down and the routers become stuck-in-active (SIA) for certain routes. The engineer checks the logs and sees no errors. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures iBGP between two PE routers in an MPLS L3VPN. The PE routers are in the same AS and are directly connected. The engineer configures 'neighbor x.x.x.x next-hop-self' on the route reflector (RR) but notices that the RR is not sending the VPNv4 routes to the client PE with the next-hop set to itself. The client PE receives the routes but the next-hop remains the original PE. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures mutual redistribution between OSPF and EIGRP on a PE router in an MPLS L3VPN. The engineer does not configure any route tagging or filtering. After a few minutes, the OSPF and EIGRP domains become unstable, with routes flapping and high CPU usage. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures DMVPN Phase 2 on a hub-and-spoke network for an MPLS L3VPN customer. The spokes are configured with a single tunnel interface and use NHRP to register with the hub. The engineer notices that spoke-to-spoke traffic is not being established, even though the spokes have each other's NHRP mappings. The engineer verifies that the tunnel interfaces are up and that the hub can reach all spokes. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures IPsec between two PE routers in an MPLS L3VPN using a site-to-site VPN. The engineer configures a transform-set with ESP encryption (AES-256) and ESP authentication (SHA-256). The engineer also configures an ACL to define interesting traffic. The VPN tunnel comes up, but no traffic is encrypted. The engineer verifies that the ACL is correct and that the crypto map is applied to the interface. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures Control Plane Policing (CoPP) on a PE router in an MPLS L3VPN to protect the control plane. The engineer creates a policy-map that matches BGP packets and applies a police rate of 100 pps. The engineer also configures a class-default with a police rate of 10 pps. After applying the policy to the control-plane, the engineer notices that BGP sessions are flapping and the router is dropping BGP packets. The engineer verifies that the ACL for BGP is correct. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) in strict mode on the ingress interface of a PE router in an MPLS L3VPN. The router is receiving VPN traffic from a customer edge (CE) router. The engineer notices that some legitimate traffic is being dropped by uRPF. The engineer verifies that the CE router has a route back to the source address in its routing table. What is the most likely explanation?

An engineer configures BGP on a PE router in an MPLS L3VPN to advertise a customer prefix. The engineer notices that the prefix is not being advertised to the BGP neighbor, even though the prefix is in the routing table and the BGP session is up. The engineer checks the BGP configuration and sees that the 'network' command is configured correctly. The engineer also verifies that the prefix is not being filtered by any route-map. What is the most likely explanation?