Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1…

A network engineer is troubleshooting an MPLS L3VPN where CE1 (192.168.1.0/24) cannot reach CE2 (192.168.2.0/24). The PE routers are running OSPF with the CEs. On PE1, the VRF configuration includes route-target import and export 100:100. The show ip vrf detail command on PE1 shows the VRF is active, but the CE1 loopback is not present in the VRF routing table. The show ip route vrf CUSTOMER command on PE1 shows only directly connected interfaces. What is the most likely cause?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The OSPF process on PE1 is not configured under the VRF.

The CE routes are not being learned via OSPF into the VRF because OSPF process is not associated with the VRF. Without the 'router ospf <pid> vrf <name>' command, OSPF runs in the global routing table and does not populate the VRF.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The route-target import on PE1 is misconfigured.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because route-target import/export is for VPNv4 route exchange between PEs, not for CE-PE route learning.

  • The OSPF process on PE1 is not configured under the VRF.

    Why this is correct

    Correct: OSPF must be configured with 'router ospf <pid> vrf CUSTOMER' to populate the VRF routing table.

  • The CE1 interface is not in the VRF.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because the VRF shows active and directly connected routes, meaning the interface is assigned to the VRF.

  • The MP-BGP session between PE1 and PE2 is down.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect because the issue is local CE route learning, not VPNv4 route exchange.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.