Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: An engineer configures mutual redistribution…

An engineer configures mutual redistribution between OSPF and EIGRP on a PE router in an MPLS L3VPN. The engineer does not configure any route tagging or filtering. After a few minutes, the OSPF and EIGRP domains become unstable, with routes flapping and high CPU usage. What is the most likely explanation?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The mutual redistribution creates a routing loop because routes are redistributed back into the original protocol without any loop-prevention mechanism.

Mutual redistribution without route tagging or filtering can cause a routing loop. When OSPF routes are redistributed into EIGRP, and then those EIGRP routes are redistributed back into OSPF, the same prefixes can be learned from both protocols. Without a route tag or a filter to prevent re-redistribution, the router will continuously re-advertise the same routes, causing route flapping and high CPU. This is a classic edge case in redistribution. The solution is to use route tags and filtering to prevent loops.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The mutual redistribution creates a routing loop because routes are redistributed back into the original protocol without any loop-prevention mechanism.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Without route tagging or filtering, routes can be re-redistributed indefinitely, causing instability.

  • The OSPF and EIGRP administrative distances conflict, causing the router to prefer the wrong route.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. AD conflicts can cause suboptimal routing but not the flapping and high CPU described.

  • The 'default-information originate' command is missing, so the redistributed routes are not advertised.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. 'default-information originate' is for default routes, not for redistributed routes.

  • The 'subnets' keyword is missing in the OSPF redistribution command, causing only classful routes to be advertised.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Missing 'subnets' would cause incomplete route advertisement, not flapping and high CPU.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 1,966 original 300-410 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.