Courseiva
hardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: An engineer configures OSPF between two PE…

An engineer configures OSPF between two PE routers in an MPLS L3VPN backbone. Both routers are directly connected via a GigabitEthernet link. The OSPF adjacency forms and then repeatedly flaps between FULL and EXSTART. The engineer verifies that both routers have matching OSPF network types (broadcast), matching area IDs, and no authentication mismatch. What is the most likely cause of the flapping?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The MTU on one of the interfaces is lower than the other, causing DBD packet fragmentation.

In OSPF, if the MTU of the interface on one side is smaller than the size of a Database Description (DBD) packet, the neighbor will be stuck in EXSTART or the adjacency will flap. This is because OSPF uses the interface MTU to determine the maximum size of DBD packets, and if a router receives a DBD packet larger than its interface MTU, it drops it and the neighbor relationship cannot progress. This is a common edge case when one interface has a reduced MTU (e.g., due to MPLS overhead or misconfiguration) while the other uses the default 1500 bytes.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The MTU on one of the interfaces is lower than the other, causing DBD packet fragmentation.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. A lower MTU on one side causes DBD packets to be dropped, preventing the adjacency from leaving EXSTART.

  • The OSPF hello interval is mismatched between the two routers.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. A hello interval mismatch would prevent the adjacency from forming at all, not cause flapping between FULL and EXSTART.

  • The OSPF dead interval is too short, causing the neighbor to be declared dead prematurely.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. A short dead interval would cause the neighbor to go DOWN, not to EXSTART.

  • The OSPF router ID is duplicated on the segment.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Duplicate router IDs would cause one router to reject the other, but the adjacency would not reach FULL and then flap to EXSTART.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every 300-410 question from scratch — 1,966 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.