Courseiva
mediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Examine the following configuration on a PE…

Examine the following configuration on a PE router:

ip vrf CUSTOMER-C

rd 200:1 !

interface GigabitEthernet0/3
 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER-C
 ip address 10.2.2.1 255.255.255.252

!

router ospf 1 vrf CUSTOMER-C
 network 10.2.2.0 0.0.0.3 area 0

!

router bgp 65000

address-family ipv4 vrf CUSTOMER-C redistribute ospf 1 exit-address-family

What is missing from this configuration?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The VRF is missing route-target export and import commands.

The VRF is missing route-target import and export commands. Without route-targets, the VPNv4 routes will not be tagged with an RT, and the remote PE will not know which VRF to import them into. Also, the OSPF process is configured under the VRF, and redistribution is done, but the RT is missing.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The VRF is missing route-target export and import commands.

    Why this is correct

    Route-targets are required for MPLS L3VPN to control the distribution of VPNv4 routes between PEs. Without them, the routes are not properly tagged.

  • The OSPF network command should use a wildcard mask of 0.0.0.0.

    Why it's wrong here

    The wildcard mask 0.0.0.3 is correct for a /30 network.

  • The BGP neighbor must be configured under the VRF address-family.

    Why it's wrong here

    For OSPF redistribution, you do not need a BGP neighbor under the VRF; the redistribution is sufficient to inject routes into BGP.

  • The VRF must have a route distinguisher that matches the route-target.

    Why it's wrong here

    RD and RT are independent; they do not need to match.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.