Question 885 of 892
People — Leading ProjectsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The correct response is to facilitate a retrospective to identify process improvements that could sustainably increase velocity. This is because velocity is a lagging indicator of past performance, not a target to be imposed; the Scrum framework empowers the team to self-organize and determine how to improve their own throughput through continuous inspection and adaptation. On the Project Management Professional PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding of agile principles versus traditional command-and-control management, often appearing as a trap where less experienced managers might artificially inflate story points or cut quality assurance. The key trap is mistaking velocity for a productivity quota rather than a planning metric, so remember the mnemonic: “Velocity is a mirror, not a hammer”—it reflects what happened, not what you demand.

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

You are leading a Scrum team. For the past three sprints, the team has consistently completed all committed user stories. The product owner wants to increase the team's velocity by 20%. What should you do?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Facilitate a retrospective to identify process improvements that could sustainably increase velocity

Option C is correct because velocity is a measure of past performance, not a target. The team should self-organize to improve. Option A is wrong because forcing a higher velocity can lead to burnout. Option B is wrong because adjusting story points artificially inflates velocity. Option D is wrong because removing testing increases technical debt.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Reduce the definition of done to skip testing activities

    Why it's wrong here

    Compromising quality violates agile principles and can lead to defects.

  • Instruct the team to commit to more stories each sprint

    Why it's wrong here

    Imposing commitments can undermine team autonomy and lead to overcommitment.

  • Facilitate a retrospective to identify process improvements that could sustainably increase velocity

    Why this is correct

    Empowering the team to find improvements aligns with agile principles and servant leadership.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Ask the team to estimate stories with lower story points to increase velocity

    Why it's wrong here

    Manipulating estimates is unethical and does not reflect true capacity.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Facilitate a retrospective to identify process improvements that could sustainably increase velocity — Option C is correct because velocity is a measure of past performance, not a target. The team should self-organize to improve. Option A is wrong because forcing a higher velocity can lead to burnout. Option B is wrong because adjusting story points artificially inflates velocity. Option D is wrong because removing testing increases technical debt.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which PMP exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 21, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.