A network engineer is troubleshooting multicast video distribution across an enterprise campus. The multicast source is connected to a switch that is the PIM Designated Router (DR) on a multi-access segment. Receivers in a different VLAN report that they are not receiving the multicast stream, although the DR shows the correct (S,G) entry. The engineer checks the RPF neighbor for the source and notices that the unicast route to the source points to a different interface than the one where the multicast stream is received. What is the most likely cause of the issue?
Multicast routers enforce a Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) check: a multicast packet is accepted only if it arrives on the interface that the unicast routing table would use to reach the source IP address. If the stream arrives on a non-RPF interface, the router discards it to prevent loops and duplicate delivery. This mismatch directly matches the described symptom of multicast traffic failing to forward, making this the correct explanation.
Why this answer
PIM uses the unicast routing table to determine the Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) interface for a multicast source. If the multicast stream arrives on an interface that is not the RPF interface (the interface the unicast route uses to reach the source), the router will perform an RPF check and fail, dropping the multicast traffic. This is the most likely cause of the issue, as the DR has the (S,G) entry but the stream is not being forwarded due to the RPF mismatch.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the RPF check concept by presenting a scenario where the (S,G) entry exists but traffic is not forwarded, leading candidates to incorrectly suspect IGMP snooping, RP configuration, or trunk issues, when the real problem is a unicast routing mismatch causing an RPF failure.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because the DR does not need to be configured as the RP; the DR is a role on a multi-access segment for forwarding multicast traffic to the RP or directly to receivers, and the RP is a separate concept for PIM-SM. Option C is wrong because the switchport connecting the source does not need to be a trunk; the source is typically in a single VLAN, and a trunk is only needed if the source is on a different VLAN than the switch's routed interface. Option D is wrong because IGMP snooping being disabled on the receiver VLAN would prevent receivers from joining the multicast group at Layer 2, but the issue described is an RPF check failure at Layer 3, not a Layer 2 membership problem.