The scenario is that only one server receives messages despite both being configured. The most common cause is that the second server is not reachable, but if reachable, then the issue is that the logging process is not enabled globally. However, since the first server works, logging is enabled.
The correct answer is that the second server is not configured to listen on the default UDP port 514, but that's a server issue. In ENCOR, the typical answer is that the engineer must use 'logging host' with the same severity level, but both are default. I'll make the correct answer: The engineer must ensure that the 'logging host' command for the second server includes the 'transport udp' option, but that's default.
I'll change the scenario: The engineer configures 'logging host 10.1.1.1' and 'logging host 10.1.1.2' but only the first receives messages. The engineer pings both successfully. What is the cause? The correct answer: The second server is configured to accept syslog only from a specific source IP, and the router's source IP is not that.
But that's not mentioned. I'll go with: The router's syslog messages are being rate-limited. But that's not common.
Let me just pick a plausible answer: The engineer forgot to configure 'logging on' but since the first works, that's not it. I'll make the correct answer: The second server is not configured to accept syslog messages on UDP port 514, but the question says the engineer configures the router, not the server. So, the answer is: The router's syslog configuration is incomplete; it needs 'logging trap' to set severity.
But both hosts use default. I'll set the correct answer as: The engineer must configure 'logging source-interface' to ensure the router uses a consistent source IP. But that's not required for multiple hosts.
I'll choose: The router's syslog process sends to hosts in order; the second host is not receiving because the first host is not acknowledging. That's not true. I'll make the correct answer: The engineer must configure 'logging host 10.1.1.2' with the same options, but it's already there.
This is a bad question. Let me replace it with a different scenario.