- A
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes and collaboratively develop an improvement plan
A retrospective allows the team to inspect and adapt, aligning with Agile principles.
- B
Reduce the scope of the project to match the current velocity
Why wrong: Scope changes should go through the change control process, not be decided unilaterally.
- C
Ask the team to increase their velocity by working overtime
Why wrong: Working overtime temporarily but does not address the root causes of technical debt and unclear requirements.
- D
Schedule additional daily standups to increase communication
Why wrong: More meetings may not be effective; the team needs to address root causes, not increase communication frequency.
Agile Velocity Drop: Root Cause Analysis Through Retrospectives
This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Your Agile team's velocity has dropped for the third consecutive sprint. The team cites increasing technical debt and unclear requirements. As a servant leader, what is the BEST course of action?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes and collaboratively develop an improvement plan
Option A is correct because as a servant leader, the best course is to facilitate a retrospective to collaboratively identify root causes of the velocity drop, such as technical debt and unclear requirements, and then develop an improvement plan. This aligns with the Agile principle of continuous improvement and empowers the team to address issues at their source rather than applying top-down fixes.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes and collaboratively develop an improvement plan
Why this is correct
A retrospective allows the team to inspect and adapt, aligning with Agile principles.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
Reduce the scope of the project to match the current velocity
Why it's wrong here
Scope changes should go through the change control process, not be decided unilaterally.
- ✗
Ask the team to increase their velocity by working overtime
Why it's wrong here
Working overtime temporarily but does not address the root causes of technical debt and unclear requirements.
- ✗
Schedule additional daily standups to increase communication
Why it's wrong here
More meetings may not be effective; the team needs to address root causes, not increase communication frequency.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates may confuse servant leadership with directive actions (like reducing scope or adding meetings) rather than recognizing that the correct response is to facilitate the team's own problem-solving through a retrospective.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
In Agile frameworks like Scrum, the retrospective is a dedicated timeboxed event (typically 1.5 hours for a one-month sprint) where the team inspects its processes and creates a plan for improvements. Technical debt, such as accumulated code complexity or missing refactoring, directly impacts velocity by increasing the effort needed for new features. Unclear requirements often stem from insufficient backlog refinement or lack of stakeholder engagement, which can be addressed through techniques like user story mapping or Definition of Ready.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
People — Leading Projects — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
People — Leading Projects practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All PMP questions
892 questions across all exam domains
- →
Project Management Professional PMP study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
PMP practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related PMP practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
People — Leading Projects practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to People — Leading Projects.
Process — Managing Technical Aspects practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Process — Managing Technical Aspects.
Business Environment — Strategy and Value practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Business Environment — Strategy and Value.
Business Environment: strategy and project benefits practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to Business Environment: strategy and project benefits.
PMP fundamentals practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP fundamentals.
PMP scenario practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP scenario.
PMP troubleshooting practice questions
Practise PMP questions linked to PMP troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free PMP practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this PMP question test?
People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Facilitate a retrospective to identify root causes and collaboratively develop an improvement plan — Option A is correct because as a servant leader, the best course is to facilitate a retrospective to collaboratively identify root causes of the velocity drop, such as technical debt and unclear requirements, and then develop an improvement plan. This aligns with the Agile principle of continuous improvement and empowers the team to address issues at their source rather than applying top-down fixes.
What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
4 more ways this is tested on PMP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Your agile team's velocity has dropped for the third consecutive sprint. The team members report feeling burned out and demotivated due to excessive overtime. What should the project manager do first?
medium- A.Increase the team size by adding new members to distribute the workload
- ✓ B.Hold a retrospective focused on identifying the causes of overtime and discuss ways to improve sustainable pace
- C.Reduce the scope of the next sprint to give the team a break
- D.Inform the product owner that the team cannot commit to any new features until morale improves
Why B: Option B is correct because the first step when facing burnout and overtime is to hold a retrospective to identify root causes and discuss sustainable pace improvements. This aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement and the PMP People domain focus on team motivation and well-being. Addressing the underlying issues before taking corrective actions ensures long-term productivity rather than temporary fixes.
Variation 2. Your agile team's velocity has dropped for three consecutive sprints. The team says they are overwhelmed by the number of user stories and that the definition of 'done' keeps changing. As the Scrum Master (project manager), what should you do FIRST?
medium- A.Reduce the sprint backlog to lower the team's workload
- B.Ask the functional manager to add more developers to the team
- ✓ C.Facilitate a sprint retrospective to identify the causes of the velocity drop and collaboratively develop an improvement plan
- D.Ask the product owner to prioritize fewer stories in the next sprint
Why C: Option C is correct because the Scrum Master's first responsibility is to facilitate a retrospective to uncover the root causes of the velocity drop and the changing definition of 'done.' This aligns with the PMP's emphasis on leading the team through collaborative problem-solving rather than imposing top-down solutions. The team's feedback about being overwhelmed and the shifting 'done' criteria indicates a process breakdown that requires team-driven improvement.
Variation 3. Your agile project has seen a consistent drop in velocity over the last three sprints. The team is demotivated and blaming external dependencies. Retrospectives have not yielded actionable improvements. What should the project manager do FIRST?
medium- A.Remove the team's external dependencies by negotiating with stakeholders.
- B.Replace the scrum master with a more experienced one.
- ✓ C.Facilitate a root cause analysis with the team to identify underlying issues and create an action plan.
- D.Increase the sprint duration to give the team more time.
Why C: Option C is correct because the first step when facing a consistent drop in velocity and team demotivation is to facilitate a root cause analysis with the team. This aligns with the PMP's focus on servant leadership and empowering the team to identify and solve their own problems, rather than imposing external solutions. The retrospective has failed to produce actionable improvements, so a deeper, facilitated analysis is needed to uncover the true underlying issues, which may include but are not limited to external dependencies.
Variation 4. You are managing an agile software development team. In the last three sprints, the team's velocity has dropped from 30 to 22 story points. The team members are experienced but seem demotivated. What is the BEST action to take?
easy- A.Reassign work to individual contributors to increase accountability
- B.Increase the sprint length to give the team more time
- ✓ C.Conduct a retrospective to identify and address the root causes of the drop
- D.Replace two team members with more productive resources
Why C: The correct answer is C because the team's velocity drop and demotivation are symptoms of underlying issues that need to be uncovered through a retrospective. In agile, the retrospective is the primary mechanism for continuous improvement, allowing the team to inspect its processes, identify root causes (e.g., technical debt, unclear requirements, or interpersonal friction), and adapt. Reassigning work or replacing team members would bypass the team's self-organization and likely worsen morale, while increasing sprint length treats a symptom without addressing the cause.
Keep practising
More PMP practice questions
- During a sprint review, the product owner rejects a completed user story because it does not meet the acceptance criteri…
- During a daily standup, a developer mentions she is blocked by a dependency from another team. The issue was not previou…
- A project manager is leading a digital transformation initiative. Midway through the project, a new regulation is introd…
- Your project is a large infrastructure build. You have completed the planning phase, but the sponsor has put pressure on…
- You are managing a software development project using a hybrid approach. During a sprint review, the product owner reque…
- Your agile project has been experiencing declining velocity over the last three sprints. During the retrospective, the t…
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.