Question 111 of 975

Quick Answer

The answer is user risk and sign-in risk. These are both valid conditions in a conditional access policy because Microsoft Entra ID Protection calculates these risk levels from real-time signals like anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel, or leaked credentials, allowing policies to trigger actions such as requiring multi-factor authentication or blocking access. On the Microsoft 365 Administrator MS-102 exam, this question tests your understanding of how risk-based conditions differ from other common conditions like device compliance or location; a frequent trap is confusing user risk with sign-in risk or overlooking that both are valid together. Remember that user risk reflects the likelihood that an account is compromised, while sign-in risk evaluates the specific authentication attempt—think of it as “who you are” versus “how you logged in.” A helpful mnemonic is “Two R’s for Risk: User and Sign-in.”

MS-102 Practice Question: Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access

This MS-102 practice question tests your understanding of implement and manage microsoft entra identity and access. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which TWO of the following are valid conditions that can be used in a Microsoft Entra ID conditional access policy? (Choose two.)

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Sign-in risk

Sign-in risk (B) and user risk (D) are both valid conditions in Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies. These risk levels are calculated by Microsoft Entra ID Protection using real-time signals such as anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel, or leaked credentials, and can be used to trigger policies like requiring multi-factor authentication or blocking access.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Network location

    Why it's wrong here

    'Locations' is a valid condition, but 'network location' is not a specific condition name.

  • Sign-in risk

    Why this is correct

    Valid condition in conditional access.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Application sensitivity label

    Why it's wrong here

    Not a valid condition.

  • User risk

    Why this is correct

    Valid condition in conditional access.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Device manufacturer

    Why it's wrong here

    Not a valid condition.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates may confuse 'Network location' with the valid 'Locations' condition, or assume that application sensitivity labels (which are part of Microsoft Purview) can be used directly in Conditional Access policies, when in fact they are not a supported condition.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Sign-in risk and user risk are derived from Microsoft Entra ID Protection, which aggregates signals from various sources including Microsoft Threat Intelligence and real-time detections like impossible travel or password spray. These risk levels (low, medium, high) can be used in Conditional Access to enforce granular controls, such as requiring password change for high user risk or blocking sign-ins for high sign-in risk. The policy evaluation occurs at authentication time, and risk levels are recalculated dynamically based on the latest signals.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related MS-102 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free MS-102 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this MS-102 question test?

Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access — This question tests Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Sign-in risk — Sign-in risk (B) and user risk (D) are both valid conditions in Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access policies. These risk levels are calculated by Microsoft Entra ID Protection using real-time signals such as anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel, or leaked credentials, and can be used to trigger policies like requiring multi-factor authentication or blocking access.

What should I do if I get this MS-102 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This MS-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-102 exam.