Courseiva

CCNA Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access Questions

17 questions · Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access · All types, answers revealed

1
Multi-Selecthard

You are deploying Microsoft Entra ID Governance. Which THREE capabilities should you include to meet compliance requirements for access recertification and lifecycle management?

Select 3 answers
A.Identity Protection
B.Access Reviews
C.B2B Collaboration
D.Lifecycle Workflows
E.Entitlement Management
AnswersB, D, E

Access Reviews allow periodic recertification of access.

Why this answer

Access Reviews (B) are a core capability of Microsoft Entra ID Governance that directly enables compliance-driven access recertification. They allow administrators to create recurring reviews of group memberships, application assignments, and privileged roles, ensuring that only authorized users retain access. This satisfies regulatory requirements like SOX, GDPR, or HIPAA by providing attestation workflows and audit trails.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Identity Protection's risk-based conditional access with governance recertification, or assume B2B Collaboration covers lifecycle management, when in fact only Access Reviews, Lifecycle Workflows, and Entitlement Management directly address compliance-driven access recertification and lifecycle automation.

2
Multi-Selecthard

Your company uses Microsoft Entra ID P2. You need to configure Identity Protection to automatically remediate high-risk users. Which THREE actions can you configure?

Select 3 answers
A.Require password change
B.Send email to user
C.Block sign-in
D.Require re-registration of MFA
E.Require multifactor authentication
AnswersA, C, E

Standard remediation for compromised users.

Why this answer

Identity Protection's automated remediation for high-risk users can be configured to require a password change as a risk-based policy action. This forces the user to reset their password, which invalidates any compromised credentials and reduces the risk level. In Microsoft Entra ID P2, this is a native remediation action available in Conditional Access policies integrated with Identity Protection.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse notification actions (like email) with automated remediation actions, or assume that MFA re-registration is a risk-based remediation option when it is actually a separate Conditional Access control for MFA lifecycle management.

3
MCQmedium

Your organization, Fabrikam Inc., uses Microsoft Entra ID with a hybrid identity configuration. You have 500 cloud-only users and 5,000 synced users from on-premises Active Directory. The company wants to implement a passwordless authentication strategy. The following requirements must be met: 1) All users must be able to sign in without a password on Windows 10/11 devices that are Microsoft Entra joined. 2) Users who are not assigned a mobile phone must be able to use a security key (FIDO2). 3) The solution must work for both cloud-only and synced users. 4) The passwordless method should require the lowest administrative overhead for enrollment. Which passwordless authentication method should you recommend?

A.Certificate-based authentication
B.Microsoft Authenticator app
C.FIDO2 security keys
D.Windows Hello for Business
AnswerC

FIDO2 security keys satisfy all requirements: passwordless sign-in on Microsoft Entra joined Windows 10/11 devices, support for both cloud-only and synced users, security key option for users without mobile phones, and low enrollment overhead (plug and play with simple registration).

Why this answer

FIDO2 security keys (option C) meet all requirements: they work on Microsoft Entra joined Windows 10/11 devices without a password, support both cloud-only and synced users, and provide a security key option for users without mobile phones as required. Enrollment is simple (plug in and register via Windows Settings) with low administrative overhead (can be pre-provisioned or self-enrolled). Option D (Windows Hello for Business) is incorrect because it uses PIN or biometric on the device, not a separate security key, so it fails requirement 2.

Option A (certificate-based authentication) requires PKI infrastructure and certificate enrollment, increasing administrative overhead. Option B (Microsoft Authenticator app) requires a mobile phone, which conflicts with requirement 2.

4
Multi-Selectmedium

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID. You need to implement a solution that allows users to sign in without a password using their smartphone. Which TWO authentication methods can be used?

Select 2 answers
A.Temporary Access Pass
B.Windows Hello for Business
C.Text message (SMS) verification code
D.Microsoft Authenticator app (phone sign-in)
E.FIDO2 security keys
AnswersD, E

Authenticator app supports passwordless sign-in.

Why this answer

The Microsoft Authenticator app supports phone sign-in, which allows users to authenticate by approving a notification or entering a number displayed on the screen, eliminating the need for a password. FIDO2 security keys enable passwordless authentication using hardware-based public/private key cryptography, meeting the requirement for smartphone-based sign-in when the key is connected via USB or NFC. Both methods are supported by Microsoft Entra ID for passwordless authentication.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse SMS verification codes (a multi-factor authentication method) with a primary passwordless authentication method, but SMS codes require a password first and are not passwordless.

5
MCQhard

You are reviewing the following Conditional Access policy JSON in Microsoft Entra ID. What does this policy do?

A.Requires MFA for all users accessing all apps from any client type
B.Blocks access for all users except Admin@contoso.com when accessing from mobile apps
C.Requires MFA for all users except Admin@contoso.com when accessing any app from mobile apps or desktop clients
D.Requires MFA for all users accessing all apps from any device
AnswerC

Matches the policy conditions and grant controls.

Why this answer

The Conditional Access policy JSON targets all users except a specific group containing Admin@contoso.com, applies to all cloud apps, and requires MFA for the 'Browser' and 'Mobile apps and desktop clients' client app types. This effectively enforces MFA for all users except the excluded admin when accessing any app from either web browsers or native/mobile clients, as defined by the 'clientAppTypes' condition.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often overlook the 'ExcludeUsers' array and assume the policy applies to all users, or they misinterpret 'clientAppTypes' as applying to all devices rather than specific client application types like browser and mobile/desktop apps.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the policy explicitly excludes a user (Admin@contoso.com) via the 'users' condition with an 'ExcludeUsers' array, so it does not require MFA for all users. Option B is wrong because the policy does not block access; it grants access with MFA, and it applies to both 'Mobile apps and desktop clients' and 'Browser' client types, not exclusively mobile apps. Option D is wrong because the policy does not apply to all devices; it applies to specific client app types (Browser and Mobile apps/desktop clients), and it excludes a specific user, so it is not universal for all users or all devices.

6
MCQhard

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID with Privileged Identity Management (PIM) to manage administrative roles. You need to ensure that when a user activates the Global Administrator role, they must provide a justification and the activation is time-bound. Additionally, you want to require approval from the security team for this activation. What should you configure?

A.Configure an Identity Protection user risk policy for Global Administrators
B.Create an Access Review for Global Administrator role
C.Configure a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for Global Administrator activation
D.Modify the PIM role settings for Global Administrator to require justification, set maximum activation duration, and require approval
AnswerD

PIM settings allow these configurations.

Why this answer

Privileged Identity Management (PIM) role settings allow you to enforce activation requirements such as justification, maximum activation duration, and approval. These settings are configured directly in the PIM role settings for the Global Administrator role, ensuring that every activation request is justified, time-bound, and requires approval from designated approvers (e.g., the security team).

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Conditional Access policies (which control authentication) with PIM role settings (which control role activation), leading them to select Option C even though Conditional Access cannot enforce approval workflows or activation duration limits.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Identity Protection user risk policies are designed to detect and respond to user account compromise risks (e.g., leaked credentials), not to control PIM role activation workflows. Option B is wrong because Access Reviews are used for periodic recertification of role assignments (e.g., confirming who still needs the role), not for enforcing activation-time requirements like justification, duration, or approval. Option C is wrong because Conditional Access policies can require MFA during sign-in, but they cannot enforce PIM-specific activation requirements such as justification, time-bound activation, or approval workflow; those are managed exclusively within PIM role settings.

7
MCQeasy

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID to manage user identities. You need to ensure that users can sign in using their existing social media accounts, such as Microsoft, Google, or Facebook. What should you configure?

A.Configure Conditional Access policies for social identity providers
B.Configure External Identities and add identity providers for social networks
C.Configure Microsoft Entra Connect to sync social account attributes
D.Configure self-service password reset (SSPR)
AnswerB

External Identities supports adding social identity providers like Google and Facebook.

Why this answer

Microsoft Entra ID supports External Identities, which allow you to add social identity providers (Microsoft, Google, Facebook) as external authentication sources. This enables users to sign in with their existing social accounts by configuring federation with those providers using OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect protocols, without needing to create separate Entra ID accounts.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Conditional Access policies with identity provider configuration, thinking policies can add or manage external authentication sources, when in fact Conditional Access only enforces rules on already-configured providers.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Conditional Access policies evaluate sign-in risks and enforce access controls after authentication, but they cannot add or configure social identity providers; they only work with already-configured identity providers. Option C is wrong because Microsoft Entra Connect is used to synchronize on-premises Active Directory objects to Entra ID, not to sync social account attributes—social identity providers are external and not synced via directory synchronization. Option D is wrong because self-service password reset (SSPR) allows users to reset their own passwords for their Entra ID accounts, but it does not enable sign-in with social media accounts; SSPR is unrelated to external identity provider configuration.

8
MCQeasy

You are configuring Microsoft Entra ID provisioning for a SaaS application that supports SCIM 2.0. The app requires the 'manager' attribute to be mapped. However, the manager attribute is not populated for all users. What should you do to avoid provisioning failures?

A.Configure the attribute mapping to 'Ignore it if null' for the manager attribute
B.Modify the SCIM schema in the application to make manager optional
C.Use the expression language to set a default value for the manager attribute
D.Delete the manager attribute mapping from the provisioning configuration
AnswerA

In the Entra ID attribute mapping editor, the 'Ignore it if null' option instructs the provisioning engine to omit the manager attribute from the SCIM request when the source user has no manager set. This prevents the target application from receiving a null value that could fail schema validation or overwrite an existing value with empty data. As a result, users without managers are provisioned successfully, and manager relationships are only updated when a real manager actually exists.

Why this answer

When the 'manager' attribute is not populated for all users, configuring the attribute mapping to 'Ignore it if null' prevents provisioning failures by allowing the provisioning service to skip the attribute when its value is null, rather than attempting to send an empty or invalid value that the SCIM 2.0 endpoint might reject. This setting ensures that only users with a manager value trigger the mapping, avoiding errors for users without a manager.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse 'Ignore it if null' with setting a default value or removing the mapping, but the correct approach is to gracefully skip the null attribute rather than force a value or delete the mapping entirely.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because modifying the SCIM schema in the application to make manager optional is typically not under your control—the SaaS application defines its SCIM schema, and you cannot alter it from Microsoft Entra ID. Option C is wrong because using expression language to set a default value for the manager attribute would assign a static value (e.g., 'Unknown') to users without a manager, which could cause incorrect data or provisioning failures if the application expects a valid manager reference. Option D is wrong because deleting the manager attribute mapping entirely would remove the attribute from provisioning, which might violate the application's required schema or business logic, and it does not address the need to handle null values gracefully.

9
MCQmedium

Your company uses Microsoft Entra ID and has a custom line-of-business application that supports SAML-based SSO. You need to configure the application to use Microsoft Entra ID as the identity provider. Which enterprise application configuration should you use?

A.Linked Sign-on
B.SAML-based Sign-on
C.Password-based Sign-on
D.OpenID Connect-based Sign-on
AnswerB

SAML-based Sign-on is correct because it enables true federated single sign-on between Microsoft Entra ID and a custom application that supports the SAML 2.0 standard. Entra ID acts as the identity provider, authenticates the user, and sends a digitally signed SAML assertion to the app's ACS (Assertion Consumer Service) URL, allowing the app to trust the assertion without prompting for credentials again. This is the recommended SSO method for non-gallery enterprise applications, especially older line-of-business apps that lack support for modern OAuth/OIDC protocols.

Why this answer

The application supports SAML-based SSO, so the correct enterprise application configuration is SAML-based Sign-on. This allows Microsoft Entra ID to act as the identity provider by exchanging SAML assertions with the application, enabling federated authentication.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse SAML-based Sign-on with OpenID Connect because both are federated protocols, but the question explicitly states the application supports SAML, not OIDC.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Linked Sign-on is used to link an existing user account in an external identity provider to Microsoft Entra ID, not to configure SAML-based SSO. Option C is wrong because Password-based Sign-on uses a password vaulting approach where Microsoft Entra ID stores and replays credentials, which does not leverage SAML assertions. Option D is wrong because OpenID Connect-based Sign-on is built on OAuth 2.0 and uses ID tokens (JWT) instead of SAML assertions, making it incompatible with an application that specifically supports SAML-based SSO.

10
MCQhard

Refer to the exhibit. The conditional access policy JSON shown above is applied to all users. A user authenticates from a trusted location and wants to access a cloud app. Which combination of controls will be enforced?

A.MFA, terms of use acceptance, sign-in frequency of 1 hour, and persistent browser never
B.Terms of use acceptance and persistent browser never only
C.MFA and terms of use acceptance only
D.MFA and sign-in frequency of 1 hour only
AnswerA

Despite the user authenticating from a trusted location, the conditional access policy's configuration dictates the enforced controls. The policy must explicitly include Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and terms of use acceptance within its grant controls, meaning these are required regardless of the trusted location status. Furthermore, the policy's session controls specify a sign-in frequency of 1 hour and persistent browser set to 'never', ensuring re-authentication and session termination after the specified period.

Why this answer

The conditional access policy JSON explicitly defines three grant controls: 'mfa' (require multi-factor authentication), 'termsOfUse' (require terms of use acceptance), and 'signInFrequency' (value 3600 seconds = 1 hour) combined with 'persistentBrowser' set to 'never'. Since the policy is applied to all users and the user authenticates from a trusted location, all specified controls are enforced simultaneously, as conditional access policies apply all grant controls in the 'grantControls' block unless overridden by session controls.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume session controls (like sign-in frequency and persistent browser) are optional or ignored when grant controls are present, but in reality, all controls in both 'grantControls' and 'sessionControls' are enforced together unless explicitly conditional.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because it omits the MFA requirement and the sign-in frequency control, both of which are explicitly listed in the JSON's 'grantControls' array. Option C is wrong because it ignores the 'signInFrequency' (value 3600 seconds) and 'persistentBrowser' (set to 'never') session controls, which are part of the policy's 'sessionControls' object and are enforced alongside grant controls. Option D is wrong because it omits the 'termsOfUse' grant control, which is included in the 'builtInControls' array as 'termsOfUse', and also ignores the 'persistentBrowser' session control.

11
MCQmedium

You need to enforce multifactor authentication (MFA) for all users in a Microsoft Entra ID tenant. The solution must not require users to register security info if they already have it. Which approach should you use?

A.Use identity protection to enforce MFA for risky sign-ins
B.Assign MFA per user in the Microsoft Entra admin center
C.Create a Conditional Access policy that requires MFA for all users
D.Enable security defaults
AnswerC

Conditional Access can require MFA; existing registered users can use their methods.

Why this answer

A Conditional Access policy can require MFA for all users while respecting existing security info registration. The policy triggers MFA during sign-in but does not force re-registration if the user has already registered. This meets the requirement of not requiring users to register security info if they already have it.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse security defaults (which enforce MFA but force registration) with Conditional Access (which can enforce MFA without forcing re-registration), leading them to choose D instead of C.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Identity Protection's risky sign-in policy only enforces MFA when a sign-in is deemed risky, not for all users, so it does not meet the requirement for universal MFA enforcement. Option B is wrong because per-user MFA assignment forces users to register security info if they haven't already, and it does not check for existing registration before prompting, violating the requirement. Option D is wrong because enabling security defaults enforces MFA for all users but also requires all users to register security info, even if they already have it, which contradicts the requirement.

12
Multi-Selecthard

Your company is implementing a Microsoft Entra ID Governance solution. You need to ensure that access reviews are performed for all guest users in the Finance department. The review must be conducted by the guest user's manager. Which THREE actions should you take?

Select 3 answers
A.Disable the 'Auto apply results to resource' setting.
B.Create an access review for the dynamic group with scope 'All guest users'.
C.Configure the access review to have reviewers be the guest user's manager.
D.Set the access review to self-review for guest users.
E.Create a dynamic group containing all guest users from the Finance department.
AnswersB, C, E

An access review must be attached to a concrete resource; here, the dynamic group of Finance guest users is that resource. By setting the review scope to 'All guest users', every member of that group is evaluated, regardless of when they were added. This ensures the review covers the exact population the business wants to recertify, rather than a static snapshot or a broader tenant-wide set.

Why this answer

A review of groups with guest members, creation of an access review for all guests in Finance, and assignment of reviewers to managers are required. Setting a self-review is not correct because the requirement is for manager review. Disabling automatic application of results is unnecessary and could prevent enforcement.

13
MCQeasy

Your company, Northwind Traders, uses Microsoft Entra ID P1. You need to allow employees to reset their own passwords without help desk intervention. The company policy requires that password resets be secured with two verification methods. Additionally, users must not be able to reuse the last 10 passwords. The solution must minimize administrative effort. What should you configure?

A.Enable Microsoft Entra self-service password reset (SSPR) and configure the number of methods required to reset to 2, and set password history to enforce last 10 passwords
B.Enable Privileged Identity Management (PIM) for all users
C.Enable Microsoft Entra password protection and configure password history in the on-premises policy
D.Configure a conditional access policy to require MFA during password change
AnswerA

SSPR provides self-service reset with configurable verification and history.

Why this answer

Microsoft Entra self-service password reset (SSPR) allows users to reset their own passwords without help desk intervention. By configuring the number of methods required to reset to 2, you meet the two-verification-method policy requirement. Setting the password history to enforce the last 10 passwords prevents reuse, and since SSPR is a cloud-native feature, it minimizes administrative effort by avoiding on-premises dependencies.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing SSPR with conditional access policies or PIM, as candidates often think MFA enforcement or privileged role management can substitute for the dedicated self-service password reset feature, but only SSPR provides the combined verification method count and password history controls required by the scenario.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is designed for just-in-time privileged role activation and access reviews, not for enabling self-service password resets for all users. Option C is wrong because Microsoft Entra password protection focuses on banning weak passwords and custom terms, not on password history enforcement; password history for cloud-only users is managed via SSPR settings, not on-premises policy. Option D is wrong because a conditional access policy requiring MFA during password change does not enable self-service password reset; it only enforces additional authentication during a change event, and it does not address password history reuse restrictions.

14
Multi-Selecthard

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID and has strict security requirements. You need to implement a Zero Trust security model. Which THREE of the following are foundational principles of Zero Trust that should be implemented?

Select 3 answers
A.Assume trust based on location
B.Segment access
C.Use least privilege access
D.Assume breach
E.Verify explicitly
AnswersC, D, E

Limit user access with Just-In-Time and Just-Enough-Access (JIT/JEA).

Why this answer

Least privilege access is a foundational principle of Zero Trust, ensuring users and devices are granted only the minimum permissions necessary to perform their tasks. In Microsoft Entra ID, this is implemented through features like Privileged Identity Management (PIM) and conditional access policies that restrict access based on role and context, reducing the attack surface.

Exam trap

Microsoft often tests the distinction between security best practices (like segmentation) and the specific foundational principles of Zero Trust, causing candidates to select 'Segment access' because it sounds correct, but it is not one of the three core pillars defined by Microsoft.

15
MCQmedium

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra ID for identity management. You need to ensure that users can sign in using their Google Workspace credentials without creating external identities. What should you configure?

A.Enable Microsoft Entra Verified ID for Google Workspace users
B.Configure Google as a social identity provider in Microsoft Entra External ID
C.Configure Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration with Google Workspace
D.Configure SAML/WS-Fed identity provider federation with Google Workspace
AnswerD

Configuring SAML/WS-Fed identity provider federation is the correct approach because Microsoft Entra ID supports direct federation with Google Workspace by exchanging metadata and establishing a trust relationship. This allows Google Workspace users to authenticate with their existing corporate credentials and gain SSO access to Entra ID-integrated apps and resources. It provides a true federation experience where Google is treated as an external IdP within the Entra tenant.

Why this answer

Configuring SAML/WS-Fed identity provider federation with Google Workspace allows users to sign in using their Google Workspace credentials directly, without creating external identities. This federation establishes a trust relationship between Microsoft Entra ID and Google Workspace as an identity provider, enabling seamless authentication for users who already have Google accounts.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse social identity provider configuration (Option B) with enterprise federation, but social IdPs are designed for consumer scenarios and create external identities, whereas SAML/WS-Fed federation preserves the user's existing identity without creating new objects in the directory.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Microsoft Entra Verified ID is a decentralized identity solution using verifiable credentials, not designed for federating with Google Workspace for sign-in. Option B is wrong because configuring Google as a social identity provider in Microsoft Entra External ID is intended for consumer-facing applications and creates external identities, not for enterprise users with existing Google Workspace accounts. Option C is wrong because Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration creates external guest user objects in the directory, which contradicts the requirement to avoid creating external identities.

16
MCQeasy

You need to configure self-service password reset (SSPR) for users in Microsoft Entra ID. Which license is required?

A.Microsoft 365 F3
B.Microsoft 365 E3
C.Microsoft Entra ID P1
D.Microsoft Entra ID Free
AnswerC

Correct. Microsoft Entra ID P1 is the specific license that provides SSPR functionality.

Why this answer

Self-service password reset (SSPR) requires a Microsoft Entra ID P1 or P2 license. Both Microsoft 365 F3 and Microsoft 365 E3 include Microsoft Entra ID P1 licenses, which support SSPR. However, the question directly asks which license is required for SSPR, and the correct answer is the standalone Microsoft Entra ID P1 license.

While F3 and E3 include this license, they are suite licenses and not the specific license component being asked for.

Exam trap

The trap is that candidates may incorrectly assume Microsoft 365 E3 and F3 only include Entra ID Free, but in fact they include Entra ID P1, which supports SSPR. This can lead candidates to dismiss these options, but the correct answer is still the specific Entra ID P1 license.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Microsoft 365 F3 includes only Azure AD Free, which does not support SSPR. Option B is wrong because Microsoft 365 E3 also includes only Azure AD Free, lacking the premium SSPR capability. Option D is wrong because Microsoft Entra ID Free explicitly excludes SSPR; SSPR requires at least a P1 license.

17
MCQmedium

Your organization uses Microsoft Entra Conditional Access. You need to block access from countries where your company does not operate. The list of blocked countries changes frequently. What is the most efficient way to manage this?

A.Enable Microsoft Entra multifactor authentication for all users from blocked countries
B.Create a Conditional Access policy that blocks all locations except the allowed countries
C.Use IP ranges in Conditional Access to block specific country IPs
D.Create Named Locations for blocked countries and use them in Conditional Access
AnswerD

Named Locations can be easily updated with new countries.

Why this answer

Named Locations in Microsoft Entra Conditional Access allow you to define countries by IP ranges and then use those locations in a policy to block access. This is the most efficient approach because you can update the list of blocked countries in the Named Locations configuration without modifying the Conditional Access policy itself, which is ideal when the list changes frequently.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often think using IP ranges directly in the policy (Option C) is more precise, but they overlook the administrative overhead of maintaining those ranges manually, whereas Named Locations with country selection provide a simpler and more scalable solution for frequently changing country lists.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because enabling MFA for users from blocked countries does not block access; it only adds an authentication challenge, which is not a block action and does not meet the requirement to prevent access. Option B is wrong because creating a policy that blocks all locations except allowed countries is inefficient when the list of blocked countries changes frequently, as you would need to constantly update the allowed list, and it is easier to manage a list of blocked countries directly. Option C is wrong because using IP ranges in Conditional Access to block specific country IPs is impractical and inefficient; you would need to manually gather and maintain a list of all IP ranges for each blocked country, which is error-prone and does not leverage the built-in country-based location detection that Named Locations provide.

Ready to test yourself?

Try a timed practice session using only Implement and manage Microsoft Entra identity and access questions.