Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →mediummulti selectObjective-mapped
An external auditor asks for proof that emergency firewall changes were reviewed and approved before implementation last quarter. Which two artifacts are the best evidence? Select two.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.
A
Best answer
An approved change ticket that shows the reviewer, approver, and timestamps.
A change ticket with approval details is strong evidence because it shows the request was reviewed before implementation and by whom. It also creates an auditable record that can be tied to the actual change event.
B
Distractor review
A screenshot of the firewall's current rule base after the change.
A screenshot proves the current state, but it does not show that the change was reviewed and approved before deployment. It lacks the approval trail the auditor is asking for.
C
Best answer
CAB or workflow approval records documenting the decision.
Change advisory board records or workflow logs provide direct evidence that the change passed the required review and approval process. They are highly useful in audits because they show governance, not just technical outcome.
D
Distractor review
A technician's memory of getting permission over the phone.
Verbal recollection is weak evidence and is difficult to verify after the fact. Auditors typically need durable records, not informal memory.
E
Distractor review
The organization's general information security policy.
A policy describes the rules, but it does not prove this specific firewall change was actually reviewed and approved. The auditor is asking for evidence of execution, not just a governing document.
Common exam trap
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Technical deep dive
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
- Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
- Underline the problem statement mentally.
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Related practice questions
Related SY0-701 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Security+ social engineering questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ social engineering questions.
Security+ cryptography practice questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ cryptography.
Security+ IAM questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ IAM questions.
Security+ risk management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ risk management questions.
Security+ incident response questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ incident response questions.
Security+ malware questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ malware questions.
Security+ vulnerability management questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ vulnerability management questions.
Security+ security operations questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ security operations questions.
Security+ zero trust questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ zero trust questions.
Security+ authentication factors questions
Practise SY0-701 questions linked to Security+ authentication factors questions.
More questions from this exam
Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.
Question 1
A laptop is suspected of being used in a malware incident. It is still powered on and connected to Wi-Fi. What should the responder do before shutting it down?
Question 2
An employee reports a ransomware note on a file server. The server is still powered on, shares are still being accessed, and management wants service restored as quickly as possible. What should the incident response team do first?
Question 3
An employee reports a ransomware note on a finance laptop. The laptop is still powered on, connected to Wi-Fi, and the user says they were just working in a spreadsheet. Management wants the fastest safe response that also preserves evidence. What should the responder do first?
Question 4
You are handed a company laptop suspected in an insider theft case. Legal says the evidence may be needed in court. Which action best preserves admissibility?
Question 5
A developer wants to reduce the risk of SQL injection in a new customer search form. Which two changes are the best mitigations? Select two.
Question 6
A branch office uses a flat LAN, and a compromise on one user workstation could spread quickly to finance systems. Management wants finance workstations isolated from general users, but finance staff still need access to a central finance application and network printer. What is the best design change?
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SY0-701 question test?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: An approved change ticket that shows the reviewer, approver, and timestamps. — The best evidence is an approved change ticket and CAB or workflow approval records. Together, these documents show that the firewall change was formally reviewed, approved, and tracked before implementation. That satisfies the auditor's request for both governance evidence and a verifiable approval trail tied to the actual change event. Why others are wrong: A screenshot shows only the end state, not the review process. Personal memory is not reliable audit evidence. A general policy may support the process, but it does not prove this particular change followed the process. Auditors need artifacts that document approval, not just configuration results.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.
Discussion
Loading comments…
Sign in to join the discussion.