Question 1,124 of 1,152
Security Program Management and OversighteasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is third-party due diligence, because the security team is systematically evaluating a vendor’s security posture before entering a contract. This process involves reviewing a security questionnaire to assess policies, proof of controls such as SOC 2 reports to verify implemented safeguards, and an independent audit report to confirm compliance with standards like ISO 27001. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this concept tests your understanding of vendor risk management and supply chain security, often appearing in questions about pre-onboarding assessments. A common trap is confusing this with penetration testing or vulnerability scanning, which are reactive technical checks, not proactive vendor evaluations. Remember the mnemonic “Q-A-R” for Questionnaire, Audit report, and Report of controls—these three artifacts form the core of any thorough third-party due diligence review.

SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Before contracting with a cloud-based payroll provider, the security team requests a security questionnaire, proof of controls, and an independent audit report. What activity is this?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Third-party due diligence, because the team is evaluating vendor risk before onboarding.

The security team's request for a security questionnaire, proof of controls, and an independent audit report before contracting with a cloud-based payroll provider is a classic example of third-party due diligence. This process evaluates the vendor's security posture, compliance, and risk level before onboarding, ensuring that sensitive payroll data is protected. It is a proactive risk management activity, not a reactive test or training exercise.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Business continuity testing, because the team is checking recovery procedures.

    Why it's wrong here

    Business continuity testing evaluates how well a process recovers during disruption. Reviewing vendor controls before signing a contract is a different activity.

  • Third-party due diligence, because the team is evaluating vendor risk before onboarding.

    Why this is correct

    Third-party due diligence is the process of reviewing a vendor’s security posture, controls, and supporting evidence before trusting them with business data or services. The questionnaire and audit report are classic inputs for that review.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Security awareness training, because the vendor is being taught safe behavior.

    Why it's wrong here

    Security awareness training is for educating people on secure behavior, such as spotting phishing or handling data. It is not the right term for vendor assessment.

  • Data classification, because the team is labeling the payroll data type.

    Why it's wrong here

    Data classification is about categorizing information by sensitivity or handling requirements. It does not describe the process of vetting a new vendor.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse third-party due diligence with business continuity testing, because both involve reviewing documentation, but due diligence is pre-contractual risk evaluation, not post-incident recovery verification.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Third-party due diligence often involves reviewing SOC 2 Type II reports, ISO 27001 certifications, or penetration test results to validate controls like encryption at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.2/1.3). In real-world scenarios, a failure to perform due diligence on a cloud payroll provider could lead to data breaches, as seen in incidents where misconfigured cloud storage exposed employee PII. The process aligns with NIST SP 800-53 and ISO 27001 supplier relationship management requirements.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Third-party due diligence, because the team is evaluating vendor risk before onboarding. — The security team's request for a security questionnaire, proof of controls, and an independent audit report before contracting with a cloud-based payroll provider is a classic example of third-party due diligence. This process evaluates the vendor's security posture, compliance, and risk level before onboarding, ensuring that sensitive payroll data is protected. It is a proactive risk management activity, not a reactive test or training exercise.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on SY0-701

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Based on the exhibit, which missing control best improves oversight of the supplier?

medium
  • A.Right-to-audit clause.
  • B.Allow the supplier to choose any encryption algorithm it wants.
  • C.Disable all contract reviews after signature.
  • D.Require the vendor to use employee badges for all facilities.

Why A: A right-to-audit clause is the missing control that best improves oversight of the supplier because it grants the organization contractual authority to examine the supplier's security controls, processes, and compliance evidence. Without this clause, the organization has no formal mechanism to verify that the supplier is adhering to agreed-upon security requirements, leaving oversight entirely dependent on trust.

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.