mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A SOC analyst receives an alert from the EDR system indicating that the process 'C:\Program Files\Vendor\Updater.exe' attempted to modify the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run registry key on a user's workstation. The analyst checks the file hash and finds it matches a known legitimate software updater. Which of the following actions is most appropriate for the analyst to take?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A SOC analyst receives an alert from the EDR system indicating that the process 'C:\Program Files\Vendor\Updater.exe' attempted to modify the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run registry key on a user's workstation. The analyst checks the file hash and finds it matches a known legitimate software updater. Which of the following actions is most appropriate for the analyst to take?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Disable the software updater immediately to prevent further registry modifications.

Disabling the software updater might prevent future legitimate updates and does not address the possibility that the updater is being exploited. The analyst should first confirm whether the activity is malicious.

B

Distractor review

Create an exception rule in the EDR to suppress future alerts for this process.

Creating an exception without thorough investigation risks allowing an attacker to hide malicious activity behind a trusted process name. This is a common but dangerous shortcut.

C

Best answer

Investigate the user's recent activity and check for signs of process hollowing or DLL injection.

This is the correct next step. The analyst should examine the process's behavior in depth, including checking for anomalies such as unexpected command-line arguments, suspicious parent processes, or indicators of code injection, before concluding whether the alert is a false positive.

D

Distractor review

Isolate the workstation from the network and reimage the system immediately.

Isolation and reimaging are extreme measures that should be reserved for confirmed compromises. Without evidence that the workstation is truly infected, this action would be premature and disruptive.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Investigate the user's recent activity and check for signs of process hollowing or DLL injection. — Legitimate processes can be abused by attackers using techniques such as process hollowing, DLL sideloading, or command-line injection. The analyst should not immediately assume the process is benign simply because the file hash matches a known good file. Further investigation, such as checking for suspicious parent-child process relationships, unusual command-line arguments, or signs of injection, is necessary to determine if the updater is being used maliciously. Creating an exception blindly could allow malicious activity to persist undetected, while disabling the updater may disrupt necessary software updates. Isolation and reimaging are too aggressive without confirmed compromise.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.