A company is evaluating different software licenses for a new project. Which THREE of the following are characteristics of open-source licenses such as the MIT License or Apache License? (Select THREE.)
Open-source licences grant access to source code and permit modification, enabling derivative works. This satisfies the stem's requirement for a characteristic of MIT or Apache licensing, since the freedom to modify is fundamental to the open-source definition.
Why this answer
Option C is correct because open-source licenses such as MIT and Apache explicitly grant the right to modify the source code, which is a core requirement of the Open Source Initiative definition. Option D is correct because these licenses permit redistribution of the software, including in original or modified form, subject only to attribution or notice requirements. Option E is correct because open-source licenses grant freedom of use for any purpose, including commercial use, without field-of-use restrictions.
Option A is incorrect because open-source licenses do not require modifications to be kept private; in fact, they permit and often encourage public distribution of modified versions. Option B is incorrect because MIT and Apache licenses are royalty-free and do not require payment of a fee to use the software.
Exam trap
The trap here is confusing open-source freedoms with proprietary restrictions—candidates may incorrectly assume that 'open' means limited rights or that fees are required, when in fact the OSI definition mandates free use, modification, and redistribution.