While reviewing a dashboard, an analyst notices that the data in a trend line chart does not match the underlying data due to a filter setting. The dashboard is used for weekly executive meetings. What should the analyst do?
Proactive approach maintains data integrity and trust.
Why this answer
The analyst has identified a data integrity issue caused by a filter setting that directly impacts the accuracy of the trend line chart. The dashboard is used for weekly executive meetings, so the analyst must document the discrepancy and correct the filter before the next meeting to ensure data-driven decisions are based on accurate visualizations. This aligns with best practices in data governance and the principle of maintaining trust in reporting tools.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates may assume small discrepancies are acceptable or that waiting for complaints is a valid approach, but the exam emphasizes proactive data integrity and the importance of maintaining accurate visualizations for scheduled stakeholder meetings.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because ignoring even a small discrepancy in a dashboard used for executive decision-making can lead to compounded errors in trend analysis and erode trust in the data; any deviation from the underlying data must be investigated and corrected. Option B is wrong because waiting for someone to complain is reactive and unprofessional; the analyst should proactively ensure data accuracy, especially for a recurring weekly meeting where stakeholders rely on consistent, correct visualizations. Option C is wrong because immediately removing the dashboard and sending raw data disrupts the established reporting workflow and forces executives to interpret unaggregated data, which is inefficient and likely to introduce new errors; the proper action is to fix the filter and restore the correct trend line chart.