Which TWO configuration steps are required to implement Policy-Based Routing (PBR) on a Cisco router? (Choose TWO.)
PBR requires a route-map defining the match criteria identifying traffic and the set clauses specifying the next-hop or interface. Without this policy definition, the router has no instructions to deviate from destination-based forwarding, so creating the route-map is an essential configuration step before it can be applied.
Why this answer
Option A is correct because PBR is defined inside a route-map, where 'match' statements identify the traffic (typically via an ACL or prefix-list) and 'set' statements define the forwarding action such as 'set ip next-hop' or 'set interface'. Option B is correct because the route-map must be attached to the ingress interface with the interface-level command 'ip policy route-map <name>' for PBR to take effect on transit traffic. Option C is not required as a separate step because the ACL is referenced within the route-map's match statement rather than configured as an independent mandatory configuration element.
Option D is not required because Cisco Express Forwarding is enabled by default on modern Cisco IOS platforms and is not a PBR-specific configuration step. Option E is incorrect for this scenario because 'ip local policy route-map' applies PBR to router-generated (locally sourced) traffic, not to traffic being routed through an interface.
Exam trap
300-410 often tests the confusion between 'ip policy route-map' (for transit traffic on an interface) and 'ip local policy route-map' (for router-generated traffic); candidates may pick the local policy command or think CEF must be manually enabled, but the two required steps are route-map creation and interface application.