Courseiva
NetworkhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

350-601 Network Practice Question

In a Cisco ACI fabric, the administrator notices that traffic between two endpoints in different EPGs but on the same leaf switch is being dropped when a contract is applied. The endpoints are in the same VRF but different bridge domains. What is the likely cause?

⚠ Common exam trap

Cisco often tests the misconception that endpoints in the same VRF can always communicate, but in ACI, contracts override Layer 3 reachability, and candidates mistakenly blame routing or subnet mismatches instead of the missing contract.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The contract does not allow communication between those EPGs.

In Cisco ACI, inter-EPG communication is governed by contracts. Even when endpoints reside on the same leaf switch, same VRF, and different bridge domains, traffic is dropped unless a contract explicitly permits the communication between the source and destination EPGs. The contract defines the filter (e.g., IP protocol, ports) and the direction (provider/consumer) required for traffic to flow.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The VRF is not configured correctly.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF configuration is correct if both are in same VRF.

  • The bridge domains are not in the same network.

    Why it's wrong here

    Different bridge domains can still communicate if contract allows.

  • The leaf switch is missing a route to the destination.

    Why it's wrong here

    Traffic is within the same leaf, so routing is not required.

  • The contract does not allow communication between those EPGs.

    Why this is correct

    Contracts must explicitly permit inter-EPG traffic.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

About these practice questions

One of 984 original 350-601 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 350-601 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-601 exam.