The answer is VRF. In Cisco ACI, contract scope defines the boundary within which a contract is effective, and setting it to VRF (private L3 context) means the contract applies only to EPGs residing in the same VRF. Since EPGs in different bridge domains are typically within the same VRF, traffic between them is denied by default unless an explicit contract is applied, while intra-bridge domain traffic between EPGs remains permitted by default due to ACI’s default forwarding behavior. On the Cisco DCCOR 350-601 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how contract scope interacts with the VRF boundary to control inter-EPG traffic—a common trap is confusing global or tenant scope, which would inadvertently allow traffic across VRFs. Remember: VRF scope locks contracts to the private L3 context, so if EPGs need to talk across bridge domains but stay within the same VRF, you must write a contract; otherwise, they stay isolated. A useful memory tip is “VRF is the fence—crossing bridge domains needs a key.”
350-601 Network Practice Question
This 350-601 practice question tests your understanding of network. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
An organization is deploying a new ACI fabric. The design requires that traffic between EPGs in the same bridge domain be allowed by default, but traffic between EPGs in different bridge domains must be denied unless explicitly permitted. Which contract scope configuration meets this requirement?
Why wrong: Context scope restricts contract application to EPGs within the same bridge domain; cross-bridge-domain traffic would be denied regardless of contract.
B
Application-profile
Why wrong: Application-profile is not a valid contract scope in ACI.
C
Global
Why wrong: Global scope would allow contracts to apply across VRFs, which is too permissive and not typically recommended.
D
VRF
VRF scope allows contracts to apply across bridge domains within the same VRF; without a contract, traffic is denied, and with a contract, permitted.
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
VRF
The VRF (private L3 context) is the correct scope because contract scope determines the boundary within which a contract is effective. By setting the contract scope to VRF, the contract applies only to EPGs within the same VRF. Since EPGs in different bridge domains are typically in the same VRF, you must explicitly configure contracts to permit inter-EPG traffic; otherwise, it is denied by default. This matches the requirement that traffic between EPGs in the same bridge domain is allowed by default (via the default intra-EPG and intra-bridge domain forwarding), while traffic between EPGs in different bridge domains requires an explicit contract.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
Context (default)
Why it's wrong here
Context scope restricts contract application to EPGs within the same bridge domain; cross-bridge-domain traffic would be denied regardless of contract.
✗
Application-profile
Why it's wrong here
Application-profile is not a valid contract scope in ACI.
✗
Global
Why it's wrong here
Global scope would allow contracts to apply across VRFs, which is too permissive and not typically recommended.
✓
VRF
Why this is correct
VRF scope allows contracts to apply across bridge domains within the same VRF; without a contract, traffic is denied, and with a contract, permitted.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Cisco often tests the misconception that 'context' is a separate scope option, when in fact the default contract scope is VRF (context), and the exam expects you to know that VRF is the correct term for the private L3 network boundary that enforces the deny-by-default inter-EPG behavior.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
In Cisco ACI, the contract scope is a property of the contract itself, not the EPG, and it defines the reach of the contract's rules. When scope is set to VRF, the contract applies only to EPGs within the same VRF, and any inter-EPG traffic not matching a contract is dropped by the hardware access control lists (ACLs) programmed in the leaf switches. A subtle behavior is that intra-bridge domain traffic (EPGs in the same bridge domain) is allowed by default due to the 'intra-EPG isolation' setting being disabled by default, but inter-bridge domain traffic within the same VRF requires a contract—this is a common source of confusion because the default forwarding behavior differs between intra- and inter-bridge domain traffic.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security administrator must allow nursing staff to reach a patient records server while blocking access from the guest Wi-Fi VLAN. After applying an extended ACL, traffic is still blocked from nursing workstations. The ACL was applied outbound instead of inbound on the wrong interface. Questions like this test ACL direction and placement rules.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Network — This question tests Network — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: VRF — The VRF (private L3 context) is the correct scope because contract scope determines the boundary within which a contract is effective. By setting the contract scope to VRF, the contract applies only to EPGs within the same VRF. Since EPGs in different bridge domains are typically in the same VRF, you must explicitly configure contracts to permit inter-EPG traffic; otherwise, it is denied by default. This matches the requirement that traffic between EPGs in the same bridge domain is allowed by default (via the default intra-EPG and intra-bridge domain forwarding), while traffic between EPGs in different bridge domains requires an explicit contract.
What should I do if I get this 350-601 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A data center uses Cisco ACI with multiple tenants. The security policy requires that all traffic between EPGs must be explicitly allowed via contracts. However, the operations team reports that communication between two EPGs in the same bridge domain is working even though no contract is applied. What is the most likely reason?
medium
✓ A.The default behavior in ACI allows communication between EPGs in the same bridge domain without a contract
B.The contract is applied but not enforced due to a configuration error
C.The VRF has a default route that bypasses contract enforcement
D.A preferred group contract is applied to the VRF
Why A: In Cisco ACI, the default behavior for EPGs within the same bridge domain (BD) is that they can communicate without a contract. This is because EPGs in the same BD share the same Layer 2 domain, and ACI does not enforce contract-based filtering for intra-BD traffic unless a contract is explicitly applied. The security policy requiring contracts applies only to inter-BD or inter-VRF traffic, not to intra-BD communication.
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This 350-601 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 350-601 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.