CCNA Billing, Pricing, and Support Questions — Page 2 of 3

MCQmedium

A company runs a mix of Amazon EC2 instances (different instance families) and AWS Fargate tasks across multiple AWS Regions. The cloud operations team wants to reduce costs while retaining maximum flexibility to change instance families, operating systems, and compute platforms (EC2 or Fargate) without losing the discount. They are willing to commit to a consistent amount of compute usage (measured in $/hour) for a 1-year term. Which AWS pricing model should they choose?

A.EC2 Instance Savings Plans

B.Compute Savings Plans

C.Reserved Instances (Standard)

D.Dedicated Hosts

AnswerB

Compute Savings Plans are the most flexible discount model. They apply to any Amazon EC2, Fargate, or Lambda usage, and automatically cover any instance family, region, operating system, or tenancy. The company can change workloads freely while still benefiting from the committed discount, making this the best choice.

Why this answer

Compute Savings Plans provide the most flexibility, applying to any EC2 instance family, any operating system, and any compute platform (including Fargate) across any region, as long as the hourly spend commitment is met. This matches the team's requirement to retain maximum flexibility to change instance families, OS, and compute platforms without losing the discount, for a 1-year term.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse EC2 Instance Savings Plans (which are family-specific) with Compute Savings Plans (which are fully flexible), leading them to choose the less flexible option when the question explicitly requires flexibility across instance families and platforms.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because EC2 Instance Savings Plans are tied to a specific instance family within a region (e.g., m5 in us-east-1), so changing instance families or moving to Fargate would lose the discount. Option C is wrong because Reserved Instances (Standard) lock you to a specific instance family, OS, and tenancy in a specific region, and do not cover Fargate at all. Option D is wrong because Dedicated Hosts provide a physical server for licensing purposes but do not offer a discount based on a consistent hourly spend commitment; they are a billing model for dedicated hardware, not a flexible discount plan.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company runs multiple workloads on Amazon EC2 instances. They expect consistent usage for the next three years but want the flexibility to change instance families (for example, from M5 to C5) if performance requirements shift. Which AWS pricing model meets these requirements while providing a significant discount over On-Demand pricing?

A.Reserved Instances (Standard)

B.Compute Savings Plans

C.EC2 Instance Savings Plans

D.Spot Instances

AnswerB

Compute Savings Plans apply to any EC2 instance family, any size, in any region, and also cover Fargate and Lambda usage. This gives the company the flexibility to change instance families while still receiving a significant discount over On-Demand rates, making it the correct choice.

Why this answer

Compute Savings Plans (Option B) offer a significant discount (up to 66%) over On-Demand pricing in exchange for a commitment to a consistent amount of compute usage (measured in $/hour) for a 1- or 3-year term. Unlike Reserved Instances, Savings Plans are flexible across instance families (e.g., M5 to C5), regions, OS, and tenancy, making them ideal for workloads that may need to change instance types over time while still receiving a discounted rate.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Compute Savings Plans with EC2 Instance Savings Plans, assuming both offer cross-family flexibility, but only Compute Savings Plans allow changing instance families (e.g., M5 to C5) while EC2 Instance Savings Plans are locked to a specific family.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Standard Reserved Instances lock you into a specific instance family (e.g., M5) and region; changing to a different family (e.g., C5) would require purchasing new RIs or incurring modification fees, reducing flexibility. Option C is wrong because EC2 Instance Savings Plans are tied to a specific instance family within a region (e.g., M5 in us-east-1), so they do not allow switching between families like M5 and C5. Option D is wrong because Spot Instances offer deep discounts but can be interrupted with a 2-minute warning when AWS needs capacity back, making them unsuitable for consistent, long-term workloads that require reliability over three years.

Practice this question →

MCQeasy

What does the AWS Free Tier offer to new AWS customers?

A.Unlimited free usage of all AWS services forever

B.Free usage of certain services up to specified limits for 12 months

C.Free usage only for the first month after signup

D.Free usage for all services with a credit card on file

AnswerB

The Free Tier offers limited free usage for 12 months plus some always-free services.

Why this answer

The AWS Free Tier is designed to allow new customers to explore and experiment with AWS services at no cost for the first 12 months after sign-up. It includes specific usage limits per service (e.g., 750 hours of Amazon EC2 t2.micro instances per month, 5 GB of Amazon S3 standard storage, etc.), after which standard pay-as-you-go rates apply. This helps customers gain hands-on experience without upfront financial commitment.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume the Free Tier covers all services indefinitely or for a very short period, but the exam tests the precise 12-month duration and the specific per-service limits (e.g., 750 EC2 hours, 5 GB S3 storage) that define the offer.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Free Tier does not offer unlimited free usage of all services forever; it has defined limits per service and a 12-month expiration for the initial tier, after which only certain always-free services (like 10 GB of CloudWatch Logs) remain available. Option C is wrong because the Free Tier provides free usage for 12 months, not just the first month after signup; the 12-month period starts from the account creation date. Option D is wrong because the Free Tier does not require a credit card on file for free usage; while AWS does require a valid payment method for account creation, the Free Tier itself is not contingent on having a credit card on file—it is a promotional offer with service-specific caps.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A startup is using the AWS Free Tier for the first time. They have launched an Amazon EC2 t2.micro instance and are storing 10 GB of data in Amazon S3 Standard. The startup wants to ensure they do not incur any charges beyond the Free Tier limits. They need a managed AWS service that can automatically monitor their usage against the Free Tier allowances and send them a notification if they are approaching or exceeding those limits. Which AWS service should the startup use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Billing Conductor

AnswerB

AWS Budgets allows you to create a Free Tier budget that tracks your usage against the Free Tier allowances. You can set alert thresholds (e.g., when usage reaches 80% or 100%) and receive email or SNS notifications. This is the correct service for automated monitoring and alerting on Free Tier usage.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets is the correct service because it allows you to create a cost budget that monitors your actual and forecasted AWS spend against a specified threshold (e.g., the Free Tier limits). You can configure an alert action to send an SNS notification when usage approaches or exceeds the budgeted amount, ensuring proactive notification without manual oversight.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (a historical reporting tool) with AWS Budgets (a proactive alerting service), or they assume Trusted Advisor handles all cost monitoring, when in fact Trusted Advisor only provides recommendations and does not send threshold-based alerts for Free Tier limits.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a visualization and analytics tool for exploring historical cost data, not a proactive monitoring or alerting service for Free Tier limits. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects your AWS environment for best practices (e.g., security, performance, fault tolerance) and provides cost optimization recommendations, but it does not automatically monitor usage against Free Tier allowances or send threshold-based notifications. Option D is wrong because AWS Billing Conductor is a tool for customizing billing reports and allocating costs across business units, not for monitoring Free Tier usage or sending alerts.

Practice this question →

MCQeasy

Which AWS service provides recommendations to help reduce costs, such as identifying idle EC2 instances, underutilized EBS volumes, and unassociated Elastic IPs?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Trusted Advisor

C.Amazon CloudWatch

D.AWS Pricing Calculator

AnswerB

Trusted Advisor provides automated best-practice checks and recommendations for cost optimization, including idle resources, underutilized capacity, and savings opportunities.

Why this answer

AWS Trusted Advisor is the correct service because it provides automated cost optimization recommendations by analyzing your AWS environment. It specifically identifies idle EC2 instances, underutilized EBS volumes, and unassociated Elastic IPs, which are common sources of wasted spend. These checks are part of the cost optimization category within Trusted Advisor, and they help you reduce costs by right-sizing or releasing unused resources.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (which shows cost data) with Trusted Advisor (which provides actionable recommendations), leading them to choose Cost Explorer because it sounds cost-related, but it lacks the specific idle resource detection logic.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a tool for visualizing, understanding, and managing your AWS costs and usage over time, but it does not proactively identify idle resources or provide specific recommendations like Trusted Advisor does. Option C is wrong because Amazon CloudWatch is a monitoring service for metrics, logs, and alarms; it can track utilization but lacks built-in cost optimization checks for idle EC2 instances or unassociated Elastic IPs. Option D is wrong because AWS Pricing Calculator is a planning tool used to estimate costs for new architectures or migrations, not a service that analyzes existing resources to identify waste or provide recommendations.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company runs a combination of Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Lambda functions for its applications. The finance team wants to reduce costs by making a commitment to a consistent amount of compute usage (measured in dollars per hour) for a 1-year term. The team wants the flexibility to change instance families, sizes, and AWS regions, and also wants the commitment to cover both EC2 and Lambda usage. Which AWS pricing option should the team purchase?

A.Compute Savings Plans

B.EC2 Instance Savings Plans

C.Reserved Instances

D.Spot Instances

AnswerA

Compute Savings Plans apply to EC2, Lambda, and Fargate usage and provide flexibility across instance families, regions, and operating systems. They are the correct choice for the team's requirements.

Why this answer

Compute Savings Plans provide the required flexibility to change instance families, sizes, and AWS regions, and they automatically apply to both EC2 and Lambda usage. This plan offers a discounted hourly rate in exchange for a 1-year commitment to a consistent amount of compute spend (measured in dollars per hour), making it the only option that meets all the stated requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Compute Savings Plans with EC2 Instance Savings Plans, mistakenly thinking the latter offers the same flexibility, but EC2 Instance Savings Plans are restricted to a single instance family and do not cover Lambda or Fargate.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because EC2 Instance Savings Plans are locked to a specific instance family within a region, so they do not allow changing instance families or regions, and they do not cover Lambda usage. Option C is wrong because Reserved Instances are tied to a specific instance type, size, and Availability Zone (or region for regional RIs), and they do not apply to Lambda usage. Option D is wrong because Spot Instances are not a commitment-based pricing model; they offer significant discounts but can be terminated by AWS at any time, and they do not cover Lambda usage.

Practice this question →

MCQhard

Which AWS pricing model allows customers to commit to a consistent amount of compute usage (measured in $/hour) for a 1 or 3-year term in exchange for significant discounts, without being locked to specific instance types?

A.Standard Reserved Instances

B.Spot Instances

C.Compute Savings Plans

D.Convertible Reserved Instances

AnswerC

Compute Savings Plans offer flexible discounts across any EC2 instance in exchange for a consistent $/hour commitment.

Why this answer

Compute Savings Plans offer the flexibility to commit to a consistent amount of compute usage (measured in $/hour) for a 1- or 3-year term, providing significant discounts (up to 66%) without requiring you to lock into specific instance types, families, or regions. This model automatically applies the discount to any EC2 instance, Fargate, or Lambda usage within the committed compute commitment, making it the correct answer.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Compute Savings Plans with Reserved Instances, assuming that any long-term commitment must lock you to a specific instance type, but Compute Savings Plans specifically decouple the commitment from instance type details.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Standard Reserved Instances require you to commit to a specific instance family (e.g., m5.large) in a specific region, locking you into that exact configuration, which contradicts the question's requirement of not being locked to specific instance types. Option B is wrong because Spot Instances use spare EC2 capacity and offer discounts but do not involve a 1- or 3-year commitment; they can be terminated by AWS at any time with a 2-minute warning, making them unsuitable for a consistent, long-term commitment. Option D is wrong because Convertible Reserved Instances, while offering flexibility to change instance families, still require you to commit to a specific instance type at the time of purchase and only allow changes via exchange, not the free-form usage flexibility of Compute Savings Plans.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company operates three separate AWS accounts, one for production, one for development, and one for testing. The finance team wants to receive a single monthly invoice that shows the total charges from all three accounts combined. They also want to aggregate usage across accounts to benefit from volume discounts on Amazon S3 and Amazon EC2. Additionally, the team wants to apply a single payment method (credit card) to cover charges for all accounts. Which AWS feature should the finance team use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.Consolidated Billing through AWS Organizations

D.AWS Cost and Usage Report

AnswerC

Consolidated Billing is a feature of AWS Organizations that combines usage and costs from all member accounts into a single invoice, allows volume discounts based on aggregated usage, and supports a single payment method for the entire organization.

Why this answer

Consolidated Billing through AWS Organizations is the correct feature because it allows the finance team to link multiple AWS accounts under a single organization, enabling a single monthly invoice that aggregates charges from all accounts. This aggregation also combines usage across accounts for services like Amazon S3 and Amazon EC2, allowing the team to benefit from volume discounts. Additionally, Consolidated Billing supports a single payment method (credit card) that covers charges for all linked accounts, meeting all stated requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse cost management tools (like Budgets or Cost Explorer) with billing consolidation features, not realizing that only Consolidated Billing through AWS Organizations provides the single invoice, aggregated usage, and unified payment method required.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (AWS Budgets) is wrong because it is a tool for setting cost and usage budgets and sending alerts, not for consolidating billing or aggregating usage across accounts. Option B (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it is a visualization and analysis tool for exploring cost and usage data, not a mechanism to combine accounts into a single invoice or apply a single payment method. Option D (AWS Cost and Usage Report) is wrong because it provides detailed cost and usage data for export, but it does not consolidate billing across multiple accounts or enable a single payment method.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company is planning to migrate a legacy application to AWS and wants to estimate the monthly cost of running the new workload. The company needs to compare costs across different Amazon EC2 instance types, regions, and pricing models (On-Demand, Reserved, and Spot). The team also wants to include estimated costs for related services such as Amazon EBS storage and data transfer. Which AWS tool should the company use to generate this cost estimate?

A.AWS Pricing Calculator

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Budgets

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerA

Correct. The AWS Pricing Calculator is designed to produce cost estimates for new AWS workloads. You can select specific EC2 instance types, pricing models, regions, and associated services like EBS and data transfer to get a monthly estimate.

Why this answer

The AWS Pricing Calculator (formerly the Simple Monthly Calculator) is the correct tool because it allows users to estimate monthly costs by selecting specific EC2 instance types, regions, and pricing models (On-Demand, Reserved, Spot), and it also includes estimates for related services like EBS storage and data transfer. This tool provides a detailed, upfront cost comparison before any resources are deployed, which directly matches the company's requirement to compare costs across different configurations.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (which analyzes past costs) with the AWS Pricing Calculator (which estimates future costs), especially since both tools deal with cost data and are found in the Billing and Cost Management console.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it analyzes historical cost and usage data after resources have been deployed, not for estimating future costs before migration. Option C (AWS Budgets) is wrong because it sets spending limits and alerts based on actual or forecasted costs, not for generating upfront cost estimates for planned workloads. Option D (AWS Trusted Advisor) is wrong because it provides best-practice recommendations for cost optimization, security, and performance based on existing AWS resources, not for estimating costs of a planned migration.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A healthcare company runs a production application on AWS that stores protected health information (PHI). The company needs a support plan that provides a designated Technical Account Manager (TAM) who will perform quarterly business reviews, offer proactive architectural guidance, and help optimize the environment. The company also requires a 15-minute response time for critical system failures. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose?

A.AWS Basic Support

B.AWS Developer Support

C.AWS Business Support

D.AWS Enterprise Support

AnswerD

Correct. Enterprise Support includes a TAM, 15-minute critical case response, proactive guidance, and quarterly business reviews.

Why this answer

AWS Enterprise Support is the only plan that provides a designated Technical Account Manager (TAM) who conducts quarterly business reviews, offers proactive architectural guidance, and helps optimize the environment. It also guarantees a 15-minute response time for critical system failures, meeting the healthcare company's requirements for handling protected health information (PHI) with high availability and compliance.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Business Support's 1-hour critical response time and general architectural guidance with the dedicated TAM and quarterly business reviews that are exclusive to Enterprise Support, leading them to select Business Support instead.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Basic Support does not include a TAM, quarterly business reviews, proactive architectural guidance, or any defined response time for critical failures; it only provides access to documentation and basic support. Option B is wrong because AWS Developer Support offers a response time of less than 12 hours for critical cases but does not include a designated TAM or quarterly business reviews. Option C is wrong because AWS Business Support provides a 1-hour response time for critical failures and some architectural guidance, but it does not include a designated TAM or quarterly business reviews, which are exclusive to Enterprise Support.

Practice this question →

MCQeasy

Which AWS service or feature provides a notification when AWS is performing planned maintenance that may affect your resources?

A.Amazon CloudWatch Alarms

B.AWS Health Dashboard

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Config

AnswerB

AWS Health Dashboard provides personalized notifications about scheduled maintenance, resource health events, and AWS announcements affecting your specific account and resources.

Why this answer

AWS Health Dashboard (specifically the AWS Personal Health Dashboard) provides proactive notifications and alerts when AWS is performing planned maintenance that may affect your resources. It gives you a personalized view of service health events, including scheduled maintenance, that are relevant to your AWS account and resources.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the AWS Service Health Dashboard (public, region-wide status) with the AWS Personal Health Dashboard (account-specific alerts), or mistakenly think CloudWatch Alarms can capture AWS-side maintenance events via custom metrics.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Amazon CloudWatch Alarms monitor metrics (e.g., CPU utilization, latency) and trigger actions based on thresholds you define, but they do not natively receive or relay AWS-planned maintenance notifications. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects your environment and makes recommendations to optimize cost, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but it does not provide real-time alerts for planned maintenance events. Option D is wrong because AWS Config evaluates your resource configurations against desired policies and tracks configuration changes, but it is not designed to notify you of AWS-side planned maintenance activities.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company is planning to migrate a legacy application to AWS. The solutions architect needs to estimate the monthly cost of running Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon RDS databases, and Amazon S3 storage. The architect wants to compare different instance types, storage classes, and pricing models (e.g., On-Demand vs. Reserved Instances) to find the most cost-effective configuration. The team requires a tool that provides a detailed, itemized cost estimate without incurring any actual charges, and allows saving and sharing the estimate with stakeholders. Which AWS tool should the solutions architect use?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Pricing Calculator

D.AWS Cost and Usage Report

AnswerC

The AWS Pricing Calculator is specifically built to create cost estimates for planned AWS usage. Users can configure services, select pricing models, and receive a detailed monthly estimate. Estimates can be saved, shared, and refined without any actual spend.

Why this answer

The AWS Pricing Calculator (formerly AWS Simple Monthly Calculator) is the correct tool because it allows users to build a detailed, itemized cost estimate for AWS services like EC2, RDS, and S3 without incurring any actual charges. It supports comparing different instance types, storage classes, and pricing models (On-Demand vs. Reserved Instances), and provides a shareable link to save and share the estimate with stakeholders.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing tools that analyze past costs (Cost Explorer, Cost and Usage Report) with tools that estimate future costs (Pricing Calculator), leading candidates to pick Cost Explorer because it also shows cost breakdowns, but it cannot model a greenfield migration without historical data.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets is used to set cost or usage thresholds and receive alerts when those thresholds are exceeded, not to generate upfront cost estimates for planned configurations. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides historical cost and usage data and allows forecasting, but it cannot generate a detailed, itemized estimate for a planned migration without actual usage history. Option D is wrong because AWS Cost and Usage Report delivers detailed billing data after charges have been incurred, not a pre-migration cost estimate.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company has multiple departments (HR, Finance, Engineering) sharing a single AWS account. Each department tags its resources with a 'Department' tag (e.g., Department:HR). The finance team wants to set monthly spending limits for each department and receive email alerts when a department's spending reaches 80% of its limit. They also want a visual dashboard to compare actual spending against the budgeted amounts. Which combination of AWS services should the finance team use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer and AWS Trusted Advisor

B.AWS Budgets and Amazon QuickSight

C.AWS Budgets and AWS Cost Explorer

D.AWS Pricing Calculator and AWS Cost Explorer

AnswerC

Correct. AWS Budgets allows the finance team to create monthly cost budgets per department (using cost allocation tags) and configure alerts at 80% of the budgeted amount. AWS Cost Explorer provides a visual dashboard with charts and tables to compare actual spending against budgets, enabling the team to track progress without needing an external BI tool.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows the finance team to set monthly spending limits per department (using the 'Department' tag) and configure alerts at 80% of the budget. AWS Cost Explorer provides a visual dashboard to compare actual spending against budgeted amounts, enabling trend analysis and cost allocation tracking. Together, they fulfill both the alerting and visualization requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may think Amazon QuickSight is needed for visualization, but AWS Cost Explorer already provides built-in charts and dashboards for comparing actual vs. budgeted costs, making QuickSight unnecessary for this specific requirement.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides cost optimization recommendations and checks (e.g., idle resources) but does not support setting spending limits or sending budget alerts. Option B is wrong because Amazon QuickSight is a business intelligence service for creating dashboards, but it cannot directly set budget limits or trigger email alerts based on spending thresholds; it would require additional integration. Option D is wrong because AWS Pricing Calculator is used for estimating costs before deployment, not for monitoring actual spending or setting budget alerts.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A startup is designing a new application on AWS. They have selected specific Amazon EC2 instance types, Amazon EBS volumes, and estimated data transfer. The team wants to compare the monthly cost of running the application using On-Demand instances versus 1-year All Upfront Reserved Instances before they commit to any resources. Which AWS tool should they use to generate this cost estimate?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Pricing Calculator

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerC

The AWS Pricing Calculator is the correct tool for estimating the cost of AWS services based on planned usage, including comparing pricing models like On-Demand and Reserved Instances before deployment.

Why this answer

AWS Pricing Calculator (option C) is the correct tool because it allows users to estimate the monthly cost of AWS services, including EC2 instances, EBS volumes, and data transfer, before deployment. It supports comparing pricing models such as On-Demand and 1-year All Upfront Reserved Instances by letting you input specific instance types, storage, and transfer details to generate a detailed cost breakdown. This matches the startup's need to compare costs without committing to resources.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (which analyzes existing costs) with the AWS Pricing Calculator (which estimates future costs for new deployments), leading them to select Cost Explorer for a scenario that requires pre-deployment cost comparison.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer analyzes historical cost and usage data to visualize past spending and forecast future costs, but it cannot generate estimates for a new, undeployed application with specific instance types and pricing models. Option B is wrong because AWS Budgets sets cost or usage thresholds and sends alerts when those are exceeded, but it does not provide upfront cost estimation or comparison of pricing models for planned resources. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects existing AWS environments to offer optimization recommendations (e.g., idle resources, reserved instance opportunities) but cannot generate cost estimates for a new application that has not been deployed.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company runs non-production Amazon EC2 instances for development and testing. The finance team wants to automatically stop all non-production instances if the monthly spending exceeds $5,000. The team wants to set this up without writing custom scripts or using third-party tools. Which AWS feature should the finance team use to meet this requirement?

A.AWS Budgets with a budget action to stop EC2 instances

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Config

AnswerA

Correct. AWS Budgets supports budget actions that can automatically stop EC2 instances when actual or forecasted costs exceed the budget threshold, eliminating the need for custom scripts.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set a cost budget (e.g., $5,000) and attach a budget action that triggers an AWS Systems Manager (SSM) automation document to stop EC2 instances when the actual or forecasted spend exceeds the threshold. This meets the requirement without custom scripts or third-party tools, as the budget action natively integrates with EC2 via SSM.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse AWS Budgets (a cost management tool) with AWS Config (a compliance tool) or Trusted Advisor (a recommendation engine), assuming those can enforce actions, but only Budgets with budget actions provides the automated, threshold-based stop capability without custom code.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it provides visualization and analysis of cost and usage data but cannot execute automated actions like stopping instances. Option C (AWS Trusted Advisor) is wrong because it offers best-practice recommendations (e.g., idle instance detection) but does not support automated enforcement or budget-based triggers. Option D (AWS Config) is wrong because it evaluates resource configurations against rules and can trigger remediation via SSM, but it lacks native budget threshold monitoring and cannot directly stop instances based on monthly spending limits.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company runs a development environment composed of multiple Amazon EC2 instances. The finance team has set a monthly budget of $5,000 for this environment and wants to automatically stop all EC2 instances if the accumulated cost reaches $4,500 before the end of the month. The team needs a managed AWS-native solution that does not require custom scripts or third-party tools. Which AWS feature or service should the company use to meet this requirement?

A.AWS Budgets with a budget action that stops EC2 instances when the threshold is exceeded

B.AWS Cost Explorer with a saved filter and manual instance termination

C.AWS Trusted Advisor cost optimization checks

D.AWS Organizations Service Control Policies (SCPs)

AnswerA

AWS Budgets supports budget actions that can automate responses to cost or usage threshold breaches. You can configure an action to stop Amazon EC2 instances, which directly satisfies the requirement without custom scripts.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set a cost budget with an associated budget action that can automatically stop EC2 instances when the actual or forecasted cost exceeds a specified threshold (e.g., $4,500). This is a fully managed, native AWS solution that requires no custom scripts or third-party tools, directly meeting the requirement to stop instances automatically based on cost.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Cost Explorer's visualization capabilities with automated cost control actions, or mistakenly think Trusted Advisor can enforce cost limits, when only AWS Budgets with budget actions provides native, automated instance stopping based on cost thresholds.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides cost visualization and filtering but does not support automated actions like stopping EC2 instances; it requires manual intervention to terminate instances. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor offers cost optimization recommendations and checks but cannot execute automated actions such as stopping instances based on a budget threshold. Option D is wrong because AWS Organizations Service Control Policies (SCPs) are used to centrally control permissions across accounts and cannot directly stop EC2 instances or react to cost thresholds.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company is migrating a steady-state web server to AWS. The server is expected to run continuously (24 hours a day, 7 days a week) for the next three years. The workload has predictable CPU and memory usage and does not experience significant spikes. The company wants to minimize the total cost of running this server over the three-year period. Which AWS EC2 pricing model should the company choose?

A.On-Demand Instances

B.Spot Instances

C.Standard Reserved Instances with a 3-year term and all upfront payment

D.Dedicated Hosts

AnswerC

Standard Reserved Instances provide a substantial discount over On-Demand pricing when you commit to a 1- or 3-year term. Paying all upfront gives the highest discount, making this the most cost-effective option for a predictable, long-running workload.

Why this answer

Standard Reserved Instances with a 3-year term and all upfront payment provide the highest discount (up to 72% compared to On-Demand) for workloads that run continuously and predictably. Since this server will run 24/7 for three years with no significant spikes, a 3-year all upfront Reserved Instance minimizes total cost by locking in the lowest effective hourly rate.

Exam trap

AWS often tests the misconception that Spot Instances are always cheaper and can be used for any workload, but the trap here is that Spot Instances are interruptible and thus unsuitable for continuous, steady-state production servers.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because On-Demand Instances have no upfront commitment and charge the highest per-hour rate, making them the most expensive choice for a steady-state, always-on workload over three years. Option B is wrong because Spot Instances can be interrupted with a 2-minute warning when AWS needs capacity back, making them unsuitable for a server that must run continuously without interruption. Option D is wrong because Dedicated Hosts provide physical servers for licensing or compliance needs and are significantly more expensive than Reserved Instances; they do not offer cost optimization for a standard web server workload.

Practice this question →

MCQeasy

A company is concerned about unexpected AWS charges from development instances that developers forget to stop. Which AWS service provides a simple dashboard showing AWS service health events and can also be used to stay informed about account-level events?

A.AWS Trusted Advisor

B.Amazon CloudWatch

C.AWS Health Dashboard (Personal Health Dashboard)

D.AWS Config

AnswerC

AWS Health Dashboard provides personalized, account-specific notifications about AWS service events, planned maintenance, and security notifications that may affect your resources.

Why this answer

The AWS Health Dashboard (Personal Health Dashboard) provides a personalized view of the health of AWS services and resources that affect your account, including scheduled maintenance and account-level events. It can also surface billing alerts and other account-level notifications, making it the correct choice for staying informed about unexpected charges from forgotten development instances.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the AWS Health Dashboard (Personal Health Dashboard) with the AWS Service Health Dashboard (the public status page at status.aws.amazon.com), which shows only global service health and not account-specific events or billing alerts.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects your AWS environment and makes recommendations for cost optimization, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but it does not provide a dashboard for service health events or account-level event notifications. Option B is wrong because Amazon CloudWatch monitors metrics and logs for your AWS resources and applications, and can trigger alarms based on thresholds, but it is not a dedicated dashboard for AWS service health events or account-level events. Option D is wrong because AWS Config evaluates your resource configurations against desired policies and tracks configuration changes, but it does not provide a dashboard for service health events or account-level billing events.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company wants to purchase EC2 capacity that provides a discount over On-Demand pricing and is available only when AWS has excess capacity, with the option of interruption with a 2-minute warning. Which option is this?

A.Reserved Instances

B.On-Demand Instances

C.Spot Instances

D.Dedicated Instances

AnswerC

Spot Instances leverage AWS spare capacity at up to 90% discount, with the risk of a 2-minute interruption notice when AWS needs capacity back.

Why this answer

Spot Instances (Option C) are correct because they offer a significant discount over On-Demand pricing but can be interrupted by AWS with a 2-minute warning when AWS needs the capacity back. This matches the scenario of purchasing EC2 capacity that is available only when AWS has excess capacity and includes the risk of interruption.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Spot Instances with Reserved Instances, thinking any discount means a commitment, but Spot Instances are interruptible and based on excess capacity, not a fixed-term contract.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Reserved Instances provide a discount in exchange for a 1- or 3-year commitment, not based on excess capacity, and they are not interruptible. Option B is wrong because On-Demand Instances have no discount, no interruption risk, and are always available at a fixed price. Option D is wrong because Dedicated Instances are physically isolated at the host hardware level for compliance or licensing, but they are billed on an On-Demand or Reserved basis and do not offer a discount tied to excess capacity or interruption.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company has 20 AWS accounts managed under AWS Organizations. The finance team wants to centralize billing so that the company receives volume discounts for the aggregated usage across all accounts. Additionally, the team needs to set monthly budgets for each department and automatically receive email notifications when a department's spending reaches 80% of its budget threshold. Which combination of AWS features or services should the company use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Cost Explorer with AWS Budgets

B.Consolidated Billing with AWS Budgets

C.AWS Trusted Advisor with Consolidated Billing

D.AWS Cost Explorer with AWS Organizations

AnswerB

Consolidated Billing in AWS Organizations aggregates all account usage into a single bill, enabling the company to receive volume discounts (e.g., tiered pricing for EC2, S3). AWS Budgets allows the finance team to set custom budgets for each department and automatically send email notifications when actual or forecasted costs reach a defined threshold (e.g., 80%). This combination meets both requirements.

Why this answer

Consolidated Billing aggregates usage across all accounts in AWS Organizations, enabling volume discounts. AWS Budgets allows setting monthly budgets per department and configuring alerts (e.g., at 80% threshold) to send email notifications via Amazon SNS. Together, they meet both centralization and notification requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing AWS Cost Explorer (a visualization tool) with AWS Budgets (an alerting tool), leading candidates to pick A or D, which lack the automated notification mechanism.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides visualization and analysis of costs but does not automate budget threshold notifications or enable volume discounts through aggregation. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor offers best-practice checks and cost optimization recommendations, but it does not provide consolidated billing or budget alerting capabilities. Option D is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer with AWS Organizations only enables cost visibility across accounts, not the automated budget threshold notifications required.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company has been using Amazon EC2 instances for a production application for the past 12 months. The finance team wants to understand historical spending patterns and identify opportunities to reduce costs. Specifically, they need to see which EC2 instance families and sizes are being underutilized and get recommendations for purchasing Reserved Instances to save money compared to current On-Demand pricing. The team wants to use a native AWS tool that provides a visual dashboard of costs, usage trends, and actionable recommendations. Which AWS tool should the finance team use?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Trusted Advisor

C.AWS Cost Explorer

D.AWS Compute Optimizer

AnswerC

AWS Cost Explorer is the correct tool. It provides an interactive dashboard of historical costs and usage, allows filtering by EC2 instance family, and generates Reserved Instance purchase recommendations based on your past usage. It is specifically designed for cost analysis and optimization.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer is the correct choice because it provides a visual dashboard of historical cost and usage data, including the ability to filter by EC2 instance families and sizes to identify underutilized resources. It also offers Reserved Instance (RI) purchase recommendations based on historical On-Demand usage, enabling the finance team to compare costs and identify savings opportunities directly within the native AWS console.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Compute Optimizer (which focuses on right-sizing) with Cost Explorer (which provides both historical cost visualization and RI purchase recommendations), leading them to choose D instead of C.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets allows you to set cost and usage thresholds and receive alerts, but it does not provide historical spending analysis, visual dashboards of usage trends, or specific RI purchase recommendations. Option B is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor offers cost optimization checks (e.g., underutilized EC2 instances) but does not provide a visual dashboard of historical spending patterns or detailed RI recommendations based on usage history. Option D is wrong because AWS Compute Optimizer analyzes resource utilization and provides recommendations for instance type changes, but it does not focus on historical cost trends or provide RI purchase recommendations; it is more about right-sizing than cost savings via Reserved Instances.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company has a development environment running on Amazon EC2 instances. To control costs, the team wants to set a monthly budget of $5,000 for this environment. If the forecasted cost for the month exceeds $6,000 (20% over budget), they want AWS to automatically stop all non-critical EC2 instances to prevent further spending. Which AWS feature should the team use to implement this automated cost control?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets with budget actions

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Cost Anomaly Detection

AnswerB

AWS Budgets enables you to set custom budgets (e.g., monthly cost budget). With budget actions, you can configure automated responses when actual or forecasted costs exceed budget thresholds. For example, you can define an action to stop non-critical EC2 instances when the forecast exceeds $6,000. This fully meets the requirement.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets with budget actions allows you to set a monthly budget of $5,000 and define an action that triggers when the forecasted cost exceeds a specified threshold (e.g., 20% over budget, or $6,000). The action can automatically stop non-critical EC2 instances using an IAM role and a predefined runbook, directly enforcing cost control without manual intervention. This is the only AWS feature that combines budget monitoring with automated remediation actions.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse AWS Budgets (which can trigger actions) with AWS Cost Explorer (which only provides reporting) or AWS Cost Anomaly Detection (which only alerts), failing to recognize that only AWS Budgets with budget actions supports automated remediation.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides visualization and analysis of historical and forecasted costs, but it cannot trigger automated actions to stop instances. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor offers cost optimization recommendations (e.g., idle instances) but does not support automated budget-based actions or instance termination. Option D is wrong because AWS Cost Anomaly Detection uses machine learning to detect anomalous spending patterns and send alerts, but it cannot execute automated remediation like stopping EC2 instances.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

A company is reviewing their AWS bill and notices charges for Amazon CloudWatch. Which specific CloudWatch usage would NOT incur additional charges beyond the CloudWatch free tier?

A.Detailed monitoring (1-minute metrics) for EC2 instances

B.Basic monitoring (5-minute metrics) for EC2 instances

C.Publishing 100 custom metrics

D.Storing CloudWatch Logs beyond the free tier

AnswerB

CloudWatch Basic monitoring providing 5-minute EC2 metrics is included at no additional charge — it's automatically enabled for all EC2 instances.

Why this answer

Basic monitoring for EC2 instances provides metrics at 5-minute intervals at no additional cost, as it is included in the CloudWatch free tier. Detailed monitoring (1-minute metrics) incurs charges because it requires more frequent data collection and storage. Therefore, basic monitoring is the only option that does not generate extra charges beyond the free tier.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates assume all CloudWatch monitoring is free, but AWS specifically charges for detailed monitoring and custom metrics beyond the free tier limits, while basic monitoring remains free to encourage foundational observability without upfront costs.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because detailed monitoring (1-minute metrics) for EC2 instances is a paid feature that incurs additional charges per instance per hour, as it increases the volume of metric data points sent to CloudWatch. Option C is wrong because the CloudWatch free tier includes only 10 custom metrics per month; publishing 100 custom metrics would exceed this limit and incur charges for the additional 90 metrics. Option D is wrong because storing CloudWatch Logs beyond the free tier (5 GB per month) incurs charges for both data ingestion and storage, as the free tier only covers the first 5 GB of log data per account per month.

Practice this question →

MCQmedium

Which AWS support plan includes access to AWS Incident Detection and Response as an add-on service for proactive incident management?

A.Business Support

B.Developer Support

C.Enterprise Support

D.Enterprise On-Ramp

AnswerC

Incident Detection and Response is an add-on available to Enterprise Support customers, providing proactive monitoring and AWS-initiated response before customers notice issues.

Why this answer

AWS Incident Detection and Response is an add-on service that provides proactive incident management, including 24/7 monitoring and response from the AWS Support team. This service is only available as an add-on to the Enterprise Support plan, which offers the highest level of support with a Technical Account Manager (TAM) and proactive guidance. The Enterprise Support plan is designed for large-scale, mission-critical workloads that require rapid incident response and continuous operational improvement.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the Enterprise On-Ramp plan with the full Enterprise plan, assuming it includes all enterprise-level features like Incident Detection and Response, when in fact it is a scaled-down offering without this add-on.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Business Support plan does not include access to AWS Incident Detection and Response as an add-on; it offers only basic incident response via Cloud Support Engineers without proactive monitoring. Option B is wrong because the Developer Support plan is intended for early development and testing, providing only general guidance and best practices, not proactive incident management or add-on services. Option D is wrong because the Enterprise On-Ramp plan is a lower-cost entry point for enterprises that includes some proactive guidance but does not offer the AWS Incident Detection and Response add-on, which is exclusive to the full Enterprise Support plan.

Practice this question →

100

MCQmedium

A company uses AWS for multiple projects. Each project's resources have been tagged with 'Project' and 'Team' tags. The finance team wants to view a cost breakdown in AWS Cost Explorer using these tags. The tags are already applied to existing resources. However, when the finance team opens Cost Explorer, the tags are not available for filtering. What must the finance team do to see costs by these tags?

A.Enable detailed billing reports in the Billing console.

B.Activate the cost allocation tags in the Billing and Cost Management console.

C.Create a budget in AWS Budgets and set tag-based filters.

D.Use AWS Organizations to create separate accounts per project.

AnswerB

Correct. Cost allocation tags must be activated in the Billing console before they appear in Cost Explorer. Once activated, AWS includes the tag keys and values in cost data, and after up to 24 hours, the tags become available for filtering in Cost Explorer.

Why this answer

Cost allocation tags must be explicitly activated in the Billing and Cost Management console before they appear in AWS Cost Explorer. Even though tags are already applied to resources, AWS does not automatically make them available for cost filtering until they are activated as cost allocation tags. This activation process enables the tags to be recognized by billing and cost management services.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates assume applying tags to resources automatically makes them available for cost filtering, but AWS requires a separate activation step in the Billing and Cost Management console to enable cost allocation tags.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because enabling detailed billing reports (now called AWS Cost and Usage Reports) provides raw billing data but does not make tags available for filtering in Cost Explorer; tags must still be activated as cost allocation tags. Option C is wrong because AWS Budgets can use tag-based filters only after the tags have been activated as cost allocation tags; creating a budget does not activate the tags themselves. Option D is wrong because using AWS Organizations to create separate accounts per project is an alternative organizational approach, but it does not address the requirement to view costs by existing tags in Cost Explorer; the tags still need to be activated.

Practice this question →

101

MCQmedium

A company uses separate AWS accounts for development, testing, and production. The finance team wants to receive a single monthly invoice that covers all accounts and to benefit from volume pricing discounts across the entire organization. Which AWS feature should the company use to achieve this?

A.Enable Consolidated Billing in AWS Organizations

B.Set up an AWS Budget to track all account costs

C.Use Cost Explorer to generate a combined cost report

D.Activate AWS Trusted Advisor on the management account

AnswerA

Consolidated Billing within AWS Organizations combines usage from all accounts into a single bill, allowing the company to receive one monthly invoice and benefit from aggregated volume pricing discounts across the entire organization.

Why this answer

AWS Organizations with Consolidated Billing allows a company to combine usage across multiple accounts into a single monthly invoice, enabling the organization to aggregate usage and benefit from volume pricing discounts (e.g., tiered pricing for EC2, S3, or data transfer). The management account pays for all member accounts, and the consolidated view simplifies cost tracking while maximizing savings from AWS's graduated pricing model.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse cost monitoring tools (Budgets, Cost Explorer) or advisory services (Trusted Advisor) with the billing consolidation feature, which is the only mechanism that combines invoices and unlocks volume discounts across accounts.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because AWS Budgets is a cost monitoring and alerting tool that tracks spending against thresholds, but it does not consolidate invoices or apply volume discounts across accounts. Option C is wrong because Cost Explorer provides visualization and analysis of historical costs, but it cannot combine billing into a single invoice or enable cross-account pricing benefits. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor offers best-practice recommendations (e.g., cost optimization, security), but it does not consolidate billing or aggregate usage for volume discounts.

Practice this question →

102

MCQmedium

A company manages multiple AWS accounts using AWS Organizations with consolidated billing. The company purchases a Standard Reserved Instance (RI) for an Amazon EC2 m5.large instance in a member account (the production account). The finance team wants the discount from this RI to apply to any m5.large instance usage across all accounts in the organization. What must the company do to achieve this?

A.Set the 'shared' attribute to 'true' when purchasing the Reserved Instance.

B.Enable Reserved Instance sharing in the AWS Management Console under the Billing and Cost Management service.

C.Enable the Reserved Instance sharing setting in the AWS Organizations console.

D.No action is needed; all Reserved Instances purchased in any account within a consolidated billing environment automatically apply across all member accounts.

AnswerB

This is the correct action. The Reserved Instance sharing setting is found in the Billing and Cost Management console. Enabling it allows the member account's RI discount to be applied to eligible usage across all accounts in the organization, provided the aggregated usage meets the RI requirements.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because in AWS Organizations with consolidated billing, Reserved Instance discounts can be shared across all accounts in the organization only if the 'RI sharing' feature is explicitly enabled in the Billing and Cost Management console. By default, RIs are scoped to the account that purchased them; enabling sharing allows the discount to apply to matching usage in any member account.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates assume all RIs in a consolidated billing environment are automatically shared, but AWS requires explicit opt-in via the Billing and Cost Management console to enable cross-account RI sharing.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Reserved Instances do not have a 'shared' attribute; the sharing behavior is controlled at the organization level, not via a property on the RI itself. Option C is wrong because the Reserved Instance sharing setting is configured in the Billing and Cost Management console, not in the AWS Organizations console. Option D is wrong because Reserved Instances purchased in a member account do not automatically apply across all accounts; sharing must be explicitly enabled.

Practice this question →

103

MCQmedium

A company uses AWS for multiple workloads across several linked accounts under AWS Organizations. The finance team needs to analyze historical cost and usage data to identify monthly spending trends by service (e.g., Amazon EC2, Amazon S3) and by linked account. They also need to filter the data by date range and view the top cost drivers. The team prefers a built-in AWS tool that provides an interactive interface with graphs and tables, without requiring them to download or process raw data. Which AWS service or tool should the finance team use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Cost and Usage Reports

AnswerA

Correct. AWS Cost Explorer is a built-in AWS tool that provides interactive graphs and tables to explore historical cost and usage data, with filtering by service, linked account, region, and date range. It is designed for visual trend analysis and identifying cost drivers without needing to process raw data.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer is the correct choice because it provides a built-in, interactive interface with pre-built graphs and tables that allow the finance team to analyze historical cost and usage data without downloading or processing raw data. It supports filtering by service (e.g., Amazon EC2, Amazon S3), linked account, and date range, and can identify top cost drivers through customizable views and filtering options.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer with AWS Cost and Usage Reports, assuming both provide the same interactive analysis, but the key differentiator is that Cost Explorer offers a built-in GUI without requiring data downloads or external processing.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B (AWS Budgets) is wrong because it is designed for setting cost and usage thresholds and sending alerts, not for analyzing historical spending trends or viewing interactive graphs and tables. Option C (AWS Trusted Advisor) is wrong because it provides best-practice recommendations for cost optimization, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but does not offer historical cost and usage analysis or interactive data exploration. Option D (AWS Cost and Usage Reports) is wrong because it delivers raw, detailed CSV/Parquet files that require downloading and processing (e.g., with Amazon Athena or a third-party tool) to analyze, which contradicts the requirement for a built-in interactive interface without manual data handling.

Practice this question →

104

MCQmedium

A company has multiple AWS accounts that are consolidated under AWS Organizations. The finance team receives a single monthly bill for all accounts. The team needs to allocate costs to individual departments based on which department owns each resource. They want to see a breakdown of costs by department in the monthly cost report without manually combining data from each account. Which action should the finance team take to meet these requirements?

A.Activate cost allocation tags, tag all resources with a department identifier, and use Cost Explorer to filter and group costs by the tag.

B.Set up separate payment methods for each department's AWS account so that each department receives its own bill.

C.Create a dedicated AWS account for each department and manually sum the charges from each account's monthly bill.

D.Use AWS Budgets to set a spending threshold for each department and review the alerts to estimate departmental costs.

AnswerA

Correct. Cost allocation tags allow you to categorize and track AWS costs by department. After activating the tags in the Billing console, Cost Explorer can display cost breakdowns by tag value, enabling department-level cost allocation without manual work.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because activating cost allocation tags and tagging all resources with a department identifier allows the finance team to use Cost Explorer to filter and group costs by that tag. This provides a per-department cost breakdown in the consolidated monthly bill without manual aggregation, leveraging AWS Organizations' consolidated billing and tag-based cost tracking.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Budgets (which only tracks spending against thresholds) with cost allocation tags and Cost Explorer (which provide actual cost breakdowns), or assume that separate accounts or payment methods are necessary for cost allocation when tags suffice.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because setting up separate payment methods for each department's AWS account would generate individual bills, not a single consolidated bill, and would require manual combination to see total costs. Option C is wrong because creating a dedicated AWS account for each department and manually summing charges from each monthly bill is inefficient and contradicts the requirement to avoid manual data combination. Option D is wrong because AWS Budgets is used for setting spending thresholds and sending alerts, not for generating a detailed cost breakdown by department in the monthly cost report.

Practice this question →

105

MCQmedium

A company runs a critical production application on AWS. The internal team is unable to resolve intermittent errors that are impacting the application. The company currently has the AWS Basic Support plan and requires access to AWS technical support with a faster response time for production issues. Due to budget constraints, the company wants the most cost-effective support plan that provides a response time of 1 hour for production system impaired cases. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose?

A.Developer Support

B.Business Support

C.Enterprise Support

D.Enterprise On-Ramp

AnswerB

The Business Support plan offers a response time of 1 hour for production system impaired cases, which directly meets the company's requirement. It is the most cost-effective plan that provides this level of support.

Why this answer

The AWS Business Support plan is the most cost-effective option that provides a 1-hour response time for production system impaired cases. The Basic Support plan offers no technical support, while the Developer Support plan only provides a 12-hour response time for impaired systems, which does not meet the requirement. Business Support is the lowest-tier plan that includes 1-hour response for production issues, making it the correct choice.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse the Developer Support plan's 12-hour response for production issues with the 1-hour response required, or assume that only Enterprise-level plans offer fast response times, overlooking the Business Support plan as the cost-effective middle ground.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (Developer Support) is wrong because it only provides a 12-hour response time for production system impaired cases, not the required 1-hour response. Option C (Enterprise Support) is wrong because although it offers a 1-hour response for production issues, it is significantly more expensive than Business Support and includes additional features (like a Technical Account Manager) that are not needed, making it not the most cost-effective. Option D (Enterprise On-Ramp) is wrong because it is designed for customers moving to Enterprise support and provides a 1-hour response for production issues but at a higher cost than Business Support, and it is not the most cost-effective option for this requirement.

Practice this question →

106

MCQmedium

A company is considering AWS for their new application. Which tool allows them to compare the cost of running their workloads on AWS versus on-premises, and estimate the potential savings?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Pricing Calculator

C.AWS Budgets

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerB

AWS Pricing Calculator estimates costs for AWS architectures and supports TCO analysis comparing on-premises infrastructure costs versus AWS cloud costs for migration business cases.

Why this answer

AWS Pricing Calculator (formerly TCO Calculator) is specifically designed to compare the cost of running workloads on AWS versus on-premises environments. It allows users to input their current on-premises infrastructure details (such as server specifications, storage, and network usage) and generates a detailed cost comparison, including estimated savings from migrating to AWS. This directly matches the question's requirement for comparing costs and estimating potential savings.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (which shows historical AWS spending) with the AWS Pricing Calculator (which is used for upfront cost comparison and estimation before migration), leading them to select Cost Explorer incorrectly.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a tool for visualizing, understanding, and managing AWS costs and usage over time, not for comparing on-premises costs to AWS. Option C is wrong because AWS Budgets is used to set custom cost and usage budgets and receive alerts when thresholds are exceeded, not for cost comparison or savings estimation. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects your AWS environment and provides recommendations to save money, improve performance, and close security gaps, but it does not compare on-premises costs to AWS costs.

Practice this question →

107

MCQmedium

A company runs a critical e-commerce platform on AWS. The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) wants a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) who will provide proactive architectural guidance, conduct regular operational reviews, and maintain a deep understanding of the company's AWS environment. The company also requires a response time of 15 minutes for business-critical system issues, 24/7 access to senior AWS engineers, and access to the AWS Infrastructure Event Management service for planned launches. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose?

A.Basic Support

B.Developer Support

C.Business Support

D.Enterprise Support

AnswerD

The Enterprise Support plan is the highest tier and includes all the features the company needs: a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) for proactive architectural guidance and operational reviews, a 15-minute response time for business-critical issues, 24/7 access to senior engineers, and AWS Infrastructure Event Management. This plan is designed for organizations running critical workloads that demand a high level of personalized, proactive support.

Why this answer

The Enterprise Support plan is the only AWS Support plan that provides a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) who offers proactive architectural guidance and operational reviews. It also includes a 15-minute response time for business-critical issues, 24/7 access to senior AWS engineers, and access to AWS Infrastructure Event Management (IEM) for planned launches, all of which are explicitly required by the CTO.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Business Support (which offers 15-minute response and IEM) with Enterprise Support, overlooking the critical requirement for a dedicated TAM, which is exclusive to the Enterprise plan.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Basic Support provides only account and billing support, no TAM, no 15-minute response time, no senior engineer access, and no IEM access. Option B is wrong because Developer Support offers best-effort response times (not 15-minute for business-critical), no dedicated TAM, and no IEM access. Option C is wrong because Business Support provides a 15-minute response time for business-critical issues and IEM access, but it does not include a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) or proactive architectural guidance from a named resource.

Practice this question →

108

MCQmedium

A company has multiple AWS accounts managed under AWS Organizations with consolidated billing enabled. The company purchases a 3-year Compute Savings Plan to reduce costs on Amazon EC2, AWS Fargate, and AWS Lambda usage. The finance team wants the discount from the Savings Plan to apply to eligible usage across all accounts in the organization. What configuration is required to achieve this?

A.The Savings Plan must be purchased in the management account, and the discount automatically applies to all accounts in the organization.

B.The Savings Plan must be purchased separately in each account where the discount is needed.

C.The finance team must create custom cost allocation tags to distribute the Savings Plan discount across accounts.

D.The Savings Plan must be linked to each member account using the AWS Billing Conductor.

AnswerA

This configuration is correct. With consolidated billing, Savings Plans purchased in the management account cover eligible usage across all member accounts automatically.

Why this answer

When a Compute Savings Plan is purchased in the management account of an AWS Organization with consolidated billing enabled, the discount is automatically shared across all member accounts. This is because consolidated billing aggregates all usage across the organization, and Savings Plans apply discounts to the combined eligible usage, regardless of which account incurred the cost.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may think Savings Plans need to be purchased in each account or require additional configuration like tags or Billing Conductor, when in fact consolidated billing automatically shares the discount across the entire organization.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because purchasing a Savings Plan separately in each account would not allow the discount to be shared across the organization; each account would only receive its own discount, defeating the purpose of consolidated billing. Option C is wrong because cost allocation tags are used for tracking and reporting costs, not for distributing or applying Savings Plan discounts; discounts are applied automatically based on usage and billing aggregation. Option D is wrong because AWS Billing Conductor is a tool for customizing billing reports and allocating costs, not for linking Savings Plans to accounts; Savings Plan sharing is inherent to consolidated billing and does not require Billing Conductor.

Practice this question →

109

MCQmedium

A company has a monthly budget of $10,000 for its development AWS account. The project manager wants to receive an automated email alert when the actual costs for the current month reach 80% of the budget. The project manager does not want to build any custom code or manage any infrastructure for this alert. Which approach should the project manager take to meet these requirements?

A.Create a budget in AWS Budgets for the account, set the budget amount to $10,000, configure an alert for actual cost at 80% of the budget amount, and specify an email address to receive the notification.

B.Create a cost allocation tag in the Billing and Cost Management console, then configure an Amazon SNS topic to send an email when the tag's cost reaches $8,000.

C.Create a usage report in AWS Cost Explorer, set a forecast alert at 80% of the monthly budget, and configure the report to be sent via email.

D.Create an AWS Lambda function that queries the AWS Cost Explorer API daily, compares actual cost to the budget, and sends an email if costs exceed $8,000.

AnswerA

Correct. AWS Budgets allows you to set a cost budget and define alerts for actual or forecasted costs. When the actual costs reach the 80% threshold, Budgets sends a notification to the specified email address. This is a fully managed feature with no custom code or infrastructure required.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set a monthly budget of $10,000 and configure an alert to trigger when actual costs reach 80% ($8,000). The alert can send an email notification directly without requiring any custom code or infrastructure management, meeting the project manager's requirements exactly.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may overcomplicate the solution by choosing a custom-coded approach (Lambda) or a reporting tool (Cost Explorer) when AWS Budgets provides a simple, managed, and code-free alerting mechanism directly in the Billing and Cost Management console.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because cost allocation tags are used to categorize costs, not to trigger alerts; Amazon SNS alone cannot monitor costs or compare them to a threshold without additional logic. Option C is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer usage reports provide historical data and forecasts but do not support real-time alerting or automated email notifications when a budget threshold is reached. Option D is wrong because it requires building and managing a custom AWS Lambda function and infrastructure, which violates the requirement of not building custom code or managing infrastructure.

Practice this question →

110

MCQmedium

A company plans to migrate its on-premises workload to AWS. The finance team wants to compare the total cost of ownership between running the workload on-premises and running it on AWS. They need to estimate monthly costs for different Amazon EC2 instance types, pricing models (On-Demand, Reserved, Spot), and storage options before making any commitment. Which AWS tool should the finance team use to create this detailed cost estimate?

A.AWS Pricing Calculator

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Cost Explorer

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerA

Correct. The AWS Pricing Calculator is the tool specifically designed to create detailed cost estimates for AWS services, allowing you to compare different pricing models and compute total cost of ownership against on-premises environments.

Why this answer

AWS Pricing Calculator is the correct tool because it allows users to create detailed cost estimates for AWS services, including EC2 instance types, pricing models (On-Demand, Reserved, Spot), and storage options, before any commitment. It provides a granular breakdown of monthly costs, enabling a total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison between on-premises and AWS workloads. This aligns directly with the finance team's requirement to estimate costs without incurring actual usage.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (a historical analysis tool) with the AWS Pricing Calculator (a pre-provisioning estimation tool), because both deal with cost data, but Cost Explorer cannot generate estimates for hypothetical configurations.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B (AWS Budgets) is wrong because it is used to set cost thresholds and receive alerts based on actual or forecasted spending, not to create upfront estimates for different configurations. Option C (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it analyzes historical usage and costs after resources have been deployed, not for pre-migration estimation. Option D (AWS Trusted Advisor) is wrong because it provides best-practice recommendations for cost optimization, security, and performance based on existing AWS resources, not for generating detailed cost estimates for hypothetical scenarios.

Practice this question →

111

MCQeasy

Which AWS support plan provides access to AWS Infrastructure Event Management (IEM) for product launches and migrations at no additional charge?

A.Developer Support

B.Business Support

C.Enterprise Support

D.Basic Support

AnswerC

Enterprise Support includes IEM at no additional charge, providing dedicated AWS expertise for critical business events.

Why this answer

The Enterprise Support plan includes AWS Infrastructure Event Management (IEM) at no additional charge, providing architectural and scaling guidance for product launches and migrations. This is a key differentiator from lower-tier plans, which either do not include IEM or require an extra fee. The Business Support plan offers IEM only as a paid add-on, while Developer and Basic plans lack access entirely.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume the Business Support plan includes IEM for free because it offers a higher level of support than Developer, but AWS explicitly reserves complimentary IEM for Enterprise Support, while Business requires an additional fee.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Developer Support plan does not include IEM; it is designed for early development and testing with no access to event management. Option B is wrong because the Business Support plan offers IEM only as a paid add-on, not at no additional charge. Option D is wrong because the Basic Support plan provides only account and billing support with no access to IEM or any proactive guidance.

Practice this question →

112

MCQmedium

A company runs a production MySQL database on Amazon RDS. The workload has a steady baseline usage that requires a db.r5.large instance most of the time, but during end-of-month processing, the database needs to scale up to a db.r5.xlarge for a few days. The company wants to maximize cost savings while retaining the ability to temporarily scale up the instance during those peaks and still receive a discounted rate. Which purchasing option should the company choose?

A.Standard Reserved Instance

B.Convertible Reserved Instance

C.Compute Savings Plan

D.On-Demand

AnswerB

Convertible Reserved Instances for RDS offer the flexibility to modify instance attributes (such as size) during the commitment term while still receiving a discounted rate. This allows the company to temporarily scale up to a db.r5.xlarge during peak periods without losing the RI discount.

Why this answer

Convertible Reserved Instances (RIs) allow you to change instance attributes (such as size) during the term, which fits the need to temporarily scale from db.r5.large to db.r5.xlarge for a few days each month. They offer a significant discount over On-Demand pricing (typically 30-50%) while retaining flexibility to modify the instance type. Standard RIs lock you into a specific instance family and size, making them unsuitable for this variable workload.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Compute Savings Plans with RDS Reserved Instances, not realizing that Compute Savings Plans only apply to EC2 and Fargate, not to RDS database instances.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Standard Reserved Instances require a fixed instance family and size for the entire term (1 or 3 years), and you cannot temporarily scale up to a larger instance without incurring full On-Demand costs for the upgrade; they are designed for steady-state, predictable workloads. Option C is wrong because Compute Savings Plans apply to any EC2 or RDS compute usage but do not provide a discounted rate for RDS database instances; they only cover EC2 instances and AWS Fargate, not RDS.

Practice this question →

113

MCQmedium

A company runs multiple applications across hundreds of Amazon EC2 instances in several AWS accounts. The finance team needs to perform daily cost analysis by combining detailed usage data (including instance type, operating system, and custom cost allocation tags) with their own business data stored in an on-premises data warehouse. They want to export cost and usage data from AWS at the most granular level possible (down to each individual resource and hour) into their on-premises system for custom reporting. Which AWS tool should they use to achieve this?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Cost and Usage Report

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerC

The AWS Cost and Usage Report delivers the most comprehensive set of cost and usage data, including hourly granularity, resource-level details, and custom tags. It is delivered to an S3 bucket, enabling further analysis or integration with other systems.

Why this answer

AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) is the correct choice because it provides the most granular cost and usage data available, down to individual resource IDs and hourly intervals, and supports custom cost allocation tags. It can be delivered to an Amazon S3 bucket and then integrated with on-premises systems for custom reporting, meeting the finance team's requirement for detailed daily cost analysis combined with their own business data.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's visualization capabilities with the raw data export requirement, overlooking that CUR is the only service that provides hourly, resource-level data with custom tags for external integration.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides a pre-built visualization and filtering interface for cost data, but it does not export raw, hourly-level data with custom tags to an on-premises system. Option B is wrong because AWS Budgets is designed for setting cost thresholds and sending alerts, not for exporting granular usage data for custom reporting. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides best-practice recommendations for cost optimization, security, and performance, but it does not generate or export detailed cost and usage data.

Practice this question →

114

MCQmedium

A company runs a production workload on AWS and needs technical support that includes phone and email access with a response time of less than 1 hour for critical system failures. The company also wants architectural guidance for cost optimization and performance improvement. The company currently has an AWS account with the Basic Support plan. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose to meet these requirements at the most cost-effective price?

A.Basic Support

B.Developer Support

C.Business Support

D.Enterprise Support

AnswerC

The Business Support plan includes phone and email support, a 1-hour response time for critical failures, and access to architectural guidance for cost optimization and performance. It is the most cost-effective plan that satisfies all the stated requirements.

Why this answer

The Business Support plan is the most cost-effective option that provides phone and email support with a response time of under 1 hour for critical system failures, along with architectural guidance for cost optimization and performance improvement. The Basic and Developer plans lack phone support and the required response time SLA, while the Enterprise plan offers additional features (e.g., a Technical Account Manager) that are not needed here, making it more expensive than necessary.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the Developer Support plan's email-only support with phone access, or assume that the Basic plan includes any form of technical support beyond community forums, leading them to overlook the specific response time and channel requirements.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Basic Support plan provides only documentation, whitepapers, and community forums with no phone or email access and no response time SLA for critical failures. Option B is wrong because the Developer Support plan offers email-only support with a response time of less than 12 hours for critical failures, not the required under 1 hour phone and email access. Option D is wrong because the Enterprise Support plan includes phone and email support with a 15-minute response time for critical failures and architectural guidance, but it is significantly more expensive than the Business plan and includes features (e.g., a Technical Account Manager, infrastructure event management) that are not required, making it not the most cost-effective choice.

Practice this question →

115

MCQmedium

A company uses multiple AWS accounts and wants to perform detailed custom cost analysis using a third-party business intelligence (BI) tool. The company needs the most granular cost and usage data available, including resource-level details such as instance type, region, and tags. The BI tool can read CSV files from an Amazon S3 bucket. The company wants a managed AWS service that automatically exports this detailed data to an S3 bucket on a daily basis with no additional coding. Which AWS service should the company use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Cost and Usage Reports

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerC

AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) publishes the most granular cost and usage data, including resource-level details, to an S3 bucket in CSV format on a daily basis. This data can be ingested by third-party BI tools for custom analysis.

Why this answer

AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) is the correct choice because it is a managed AWS service that automatically publishes the most granular cost and usage data—including resource-level details like instance type, region, and tags—to an Amazon S3 bucket in CSV format on a daily basis, with no additional coding required. This directly meets the company's need for detailed custom cost analysis using a third-party BI tool that reads CSV files from S3.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's manual CSV export capability with the fully automated, scheduled export feature of AWS Cost and Usage Reports, leading them to incorrectly select Cost Explorer.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides visual cost analysis and can export data to CSV, but it is not a managed service that automatically exports detailed resource-level data to an S3 bucket on a daily schedule without coding; its exports are manual or require API calls. Option B is wrong because AWS Budgets is designed for setting cost and usage thresholds and sending alerts, not for exporting granular cost and usage data to S3 for BI tool analysis. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides best-practice recommendations for cost optimization, performance, and security, but it does not export cost and usage data to S3.

Practice this question →

116

MCQmedium

A company runs a steady-state production workload on a fixed number of m5.large EC2 instances in the us-east-1 region. The workload runs 24/7 and the instance type and region are not expected to change. The company wants to obtain the highest possible discount for this workload with a 3-year commitment. Which purchasing option should the company choose?

A.Compute Savings Plan

B.EC2 Instance Savings Plan

C.Convertible Reserved Instances (3-year, All Upfront)

D.Standard Reserved Instances (3-year, All Upfront)

AnswerD

Correct. Standard Reserved Instances with a 3-year term and All Upfront payment offer the highest possible discount for a fixed, predictable workload because they lock in a specific instance type and region with no flexibility.

Why this answer

Standard Reserved Instances (3-year, All Upfront) offer the highest discount for a steady-state workload with a fixed instance type and region because they provide a significant discount over On-Demand pricing in exchange for a commitment to a specific instance family, size, and Availability Zone. Since the workload runs 24/7 on m5.large instances in us-east-1 and the configuration is not expected to change, Standard RIs maximize savings without the flexibility trade-offs that reduce discount rates.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Savings Plans with Reserved Instances, assuming the flexibility of Savings Plans always yields the best discount, but for a fixed, unchanging workload, Standard RIs provide the highest possible savings due to the stricter commitment.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Compute Savings Plans apply to any EC2 instance family and region, but their discount is lower than that of Standard RIs for a fixed, predictable workload, and they do not require a specific instance type commitment. Option B is wrong because EC2 Instance Savings Plans offer flexibility within a region and instance family, but their discount is still less than Standard RIs for a fixed instance type and size, and they do not lock in a specific Availability Zone. Option C is wrong because Convertible Reserved Instances allow changing instance families and attributes, but they offer a lower discount than Standard RIs due to this flexibility, making them less cost-effective for a workload with no expected changes.

Practice this question →

117

MCQmedium

A company archives historical transaction records in Amazon S3. The records are accessed frequently for the first 30 days after creation. After 30 days, access drops sharply to only a few times per year, but the company must be able to retrieve any record within 5 minutes if needed. The company wants to minimize storage costs while meeting the retrieval time requirement. Which combination of S3 storage classes should the company use?

A.Use S3 Standard for all data.

B.Use S3 Standard for the first 30 days, then transition to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval.

C.Use S3 Standard-IA for the first 30 days, then transition to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.

D.Use S3 One Zone-IA for the first 30 days, then transition to S3 Glacier Deep Archive.

AnswerB

S3 Standard provides low-latency access for the initial frequent access period. After 30 days, transitioning to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval reduces storage costs significantly. Although standard retrieval from S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval takes hours, the company can use expedited retrieval (available as an optional feature) to meet the 5-minute requirement when needed, at an additional cost.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because S3 Standard provides low-latency access for the first 30 days when records are frequently accessed, and then lifecycle rules transition the data to S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval, which offers retrieval times of minutes (typically 1–5 minutes for expedited retrievals) at a much lower storage cost. This combination meets the 5-minute retrieval requirement while minimizing costs for data that is rarely accessed after 30 days.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse S3 Glacier Deep Archive's retrieval time (12–48 hours) with S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval's faster expedited retrieval (1–5 minutes), leading them to incorrectly choose a cheaper but non-compliant storage class.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because using S3 Standard for all data would incur unnecessarily high storage costs for data that is rarely accessed after 30 days, failing to minimize storage costs. Option C is wrong because S3 Standard-IA is designed for infrequently accessed data but still has a minimum storage duration charge of 30 days and higher retrieval costs, making it less cost-effective for the first 30 days of frequent access; additionally, S3 Glacier Deep Archive has a retrieval time of 12–48 hours, which violates the 5-minute retrieval requirement.

Practice this question →

118

MCQmedium

A company operates multiple AWS accounts for separate departments. The finance team wants to simplify monthly billing by receiving a single consolidated invoice that covers all accounts. Additionally, the company wants to aggregate usage across accounts to qualify for lower volume-based pricing tiers. Which AWS feature should the company enable to meet these requirements?

A.Consolidated billing through AWS Organizations

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Budgets

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerA

Consolidated billing enables a single invoice for multiple accounts and aggregates usage for volume discounts, which directly meets both requirements.

Why this answer

AWS Organizations enables consolidated billing by allowing you to combine multiple AWS accounts under a single paying account, which aggregates usage across all accounts. This aggregation qualifies the company for lower volume-based pricing tiers (e.g., AWS volume discounts for services like S3 or EC2) because usage is summed across all member accounts. The master account receives a single consolidated invoice covering all accounts, simplifying monthly billing.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Cost Explorer or AWS Budgets with billing consolidation features, but neither of those tools actually aggregates usage across accounts or generates a single invoice; they are monitoring and alerting tools, not billing consolidation services.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a tool for visualizing, analyzing, and forecasting AWS costs and usage, but it does not consolidate billing or aggregate usage for pricing tiers; it only provides insights into existing cost data. Option C is wrong because AWS Budgets allows you to set custom cost and usage budgets and receive alerts when thresholds are exceeded, but it does not enable consolidated invoicing or volume-based pricing aggregation.

Practice this question →

119

MCQmedium

A company has been using AWS for several months. The finance team wants to view a graphical dashboard of their monthly spending trends for the past 6 months and also obtain a forecast of their expected costs for the next month. The team needs an AWS managed service that provides this visualization and forecasting without requiring any additional data export or third-party tools. Which AWS service should the team use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Cost and Usage Report

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerA

Correct. AWS Cost Explorer is a managed service that provides a graphical interface to view and analyze historical cost and usage data. It also includes a forecasting feature to predict future costs, all without requiring any additional setup or third-party tools.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer provides a pre-built, managed graphical dashboard that visualizes historical spending trends and generates cost forecasts for the next month without requiring any data export or third-party tools. It allows filtering by time range (e.g., past 6 months) and automatically computes a forecast based on historical usage patterns using AWS's internal machine learning models.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Budgets (which only alerts on thresholds) with Cost Explorer (which provides historical visualization and forecasting), or they assume the Cost and Usage Report includes a built-in dashboard when it actually only provides raw data for external tools.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B (AWS Budgets) is wrong because AWS Budgets is designed for setting cost and usage thresholds and sending alerts when those thresholds are exceeded, not for providing a graphical dashboard of historical spending trends or forecasting future costs. Option C (AWS Cost and Usage Report) is wrong because it delivers detailed, raw billing data in CSV or Parquet format that must be exported to another tool (e.g., Amazon Athena, QuickSight) for visualization and forecasting; it does not offer a built-in graphical dashboard or forecasting capability.

Practice this question →

120

MCQeasy

A company operates three separate AWS accounts: development, testing, and production. Each account independently incurs Amazon S3 data transfer charges. The company signs up for AWS Organizations and enables consolidated billing. How does consolidated billing affect the S3 data transfer pricing for the company?

A.It applies a flat 20% discount to all S3 data transfer charges across accounts.

B.It aggregates the data transfer usage across all accounts, allowing the company to benefit from lower pricing tiers that are based on total usage.

C.It allows the company to use a single payment method and automatically applies Reserved Instance pricing to data transfer.

D.It creates a single combined bill and automatically applies an enterprise discount negotiated with AWS.

AnswerB

This is correct. With consolidated billing, the data transfer usage from all accounts is summed. AWS's pricing tiers (e.g., up to 10 TB, next 40 TB, etc.) are then applied to the aggregate total, often resulting in a lower effective per-GB cost than if each account were billed separately.

Why this answer

Consolidated billing in AWS Organizations aggregates usage across all linked accounts. For S3 data transfer, AWS applies tiered pricing based on total monthly data transfer volume. By combining usage from the development, testing, and production accounts, the company can reach higher volume tiers, reducing the per-GB cost for all accounts.

This is the primary benefit of consolidated billing for data transfer charges.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may assume consolidated billing only simplifies payment or applies a flat discount, rather than understanding it aggregates usage to unlock higher volume pricing tiers.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS does not apply a flat 20% discount to S3 data transfer charges under consolidated billing; discounts are based on aggregated usage tiers, not a fixed percentage. Option C is wrong because consolidated billing does not automatically apply Reserved Instance pricing to data transfer; Reserved Instances apply to compute or database services, not to S3 data transfer, and consolidated billing simply pools usage for tiered pricing.

Practice this question →

121

MCQmedium

A company runs a batch processing workload on Amazon EC2 instances. The finance team has set a monthly budget of $10,000 for this workload. They want to automatically stop the batch processing instances if the accumulated costs for the month exceed $8,000, to prevent overspending. The company needs a native AWS solution that can monitor the costs and take corrective action automatically. Which AWS feature should the company use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Budgets with budget actions configured to stop EC2 instances

B.AWS Cost Explorer with a custom cost threshold report

C.AWS Trusted Advisor with a cost optimization check

D.AWS Organizations with a service control policy (SCP)

AnswerA

Correct. AWS Budgets allows you to define cost or usage budgets and set budget actions that trigger automatically when a threshold is exceeded. For example, you can stop EC2 instances to prevent further spending. This meets the requirement natively.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set a cost budget of $8,000 and attach a budget action that triggers an AWS Systems Manager (SSM) automation document to stop EC2 instances when actual or forecasted costs exceed the threshold. This provides a native, automated, and serverless solution to enforce cost controls without manual intervention.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Cost Explorer's reporting capabilities with automated remediation, or assume Trusted Advisor can take corrective actions, when in fact only AWS Budgets with budget actions provides native, automated cost-based instance control.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a visualization and analysis tool for historical cost data; it cannot trigger automated actions or stop EC2 instances. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides cost optimization recommendations and checks, but it does not have the capability to execute corrective actions like stopping instances based on a cost threshold.

Practice this question →

122

MCQmedium

A company manages multiple AWS accounts under AWS Organizations. The finance team needs to set a monthly spending limit for each account, receive automatic email alerts when spending reaches 80% of that limit, and also view a graphical dashboard showing historical cost trends across all accounts. Which combination of AWS services should the company use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Budgets and Amazon QuickSight

B.AWS Cost Explorer and Amazon CloudWatch

C.AWS Cost Explorer and AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Budgets and AWS Cost Explorer

AnswerD

AWS Budgets enables you to define monthly spending limits for each account (or the whole organization) and receive automatic email or SNS alerts when actual or forecasted costs reach a specified percentage of the budget. AWS Cost Explorer provides an intuitive, graphical dashboard that shows historical cost trends across all linked accounts, giving the finance team the visibility they need. This combination directly addresses both requirements without additional overhead.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set custom monthly spending limits per AWS account and configure alerts (via Amazon SNS or email) when actual or forecasted costs exceed a threshold, such as 80% of the budget. AWS Cost Explorer provides a graphical dashboard with historical cost trends and enables filtering by linked accounts, making it the correct service for visualizing trends across all accounts under AWS Organizations. Together, they satisfy the requirements for per-account limits, email alerts at 80%, and a historical cost dashboard.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Budgets with AWS Cost Explorer, thinking Cost Explorer alone can send alerts, or they mistakenly pair Budgets with QuickSight because both involve dashboards, but QuickSight is not the native cost visualization tool for AWS billing data.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Amazon QuickSight is a business intelligence service for creating interactive dashboards from various data sources, but it is not the native AWS service for viewing historical cost trends across accounts — AWS Cost Explorer is the appropriate tool for that, and QuickSight would require additional setup and data export. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer does not natively send automatic email alerts when spending reaches a threshold; that alerting capability is provided by AWS Budgets, not CloudWatch (CloudWatch can monitor billing metrics but requires manual setup of custom metrics and alarms, and is not designed for per-account budget alerts). Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides cost optimization recommendations (e.g., idle resources) but does not allow setting per-account spending limits or sending threshold-based alerts, nor does it offer a historical cost trend dashboard.

Practice this question →

123

MCQmedium

A company has unused Reserved Instances that don't match their current infrastructure. What option allows them to recoup some cost from unused RIs?

A.Convert them to Spot Instances

B.Sell them on the Reserved Instance Marketplace

C.Request a refund from AWS for unused RI capacity

D.Transfer them to another AWS account for free

AnswerB

Standard RIs (not Convertible) can be listed on the RI Marketplace, allowing other AWS customers to purchase the remaining term at a seller-defined price.

Why this answer

The AWS Reserved Instance Marketplace allows customers to sell unused Reserved Instances (RIs) to other AWS users, enabling them to recoup some of the upfront costs. This is the only option that directly addresses the need to recover costs from RIs that no longer match the current infrastructure, as AWS does not offer refunds or free transfers for unused RIs.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may assume AWS offers refunds or free transfers for unused RIs, but the only cost-recovery option is selling them on the Reserved Instance Marketplace, which involves a marketplace fee and is subject to availability of buyers.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Spot Instances are a separate pricing model for spare compute capacity, not a mechanism to convert or sell existing Reserved Instances; you cannot convert an RI into a Spot Instance. Option C is wrong because AWS does not provide refunds for unused Reserved Instance capacity; RIs are a commitment-based pricing model with no partial refunds for unused time. Option D is wrong because transferring RIs to another AWS account is not free; it requires selling them on the Reserved Instance Marketplace, which involves a transaction fee and is not a direct free transfer.

Practice this question →

124

MCQmedium

A company uses AWS Organizations with consolidated billing across multiple member accounts. The finance team requires that only the management account (payer account) can view and modify payment methods and receive invoices. Member accounts must be prevented from accessing billing and payment information in the AWS Billing and Cost Management console. Which AWS feature should be configured to enforce this restriction?

A.Enable all features in AWS Organizations, including consolidated billing.

B.Apply a Service Control Policy (SCP) to deny billing-related actions for all member accounts.

C.Enable AWS CloudTrail to log billing events for all accounts.

D.Configure AWS Cost Explorer to grant cross-account access only to the management account.

AnswerB

An SCP can explicitly deny actions like 'aws-portal:ViewBilling' and 'aws-portal:ModifyBilling' for member accounts. This prevents users in those accounts from accessing billing information, leaving full control to the management account.

Why this answer

Service Control Policies (SCPs) in AWS Organizations allow you to centrally restrict the AWS services and actions that member accounts can use. By applying an SCP that denies billing-related actions (e.g., `aws-portal:*` or `awsbilling:*`) to all member accounts, the management account can enforce that only the payer account can view and modify payment methods and receive invoices. This directly meets the requirement without affecting the management account, which is not subject to SCPs.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse enabling consolidated billing (Option A) with actually restricting access, not realizing that consolidated billing alone does not enforce any access controls on member accounts.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because enabling all features in AWS Organizations, including consolidated billing, does not by itself restrict member accounts from accessing billing information; it only enables centralized management and consolidated billing functionality. Option C is wrong because AWS CloudTrail logs API activity for auditing but does not prevent member accounts from accessing billing and payment information; it is a logging service, not an access control mechanism. Option D is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides cost visualization and analysis, and configuring cross-account access does not restrict member accounts from viewing payment methods or invoices; it is a cost management tool, not a policy-based restriction.

Practice this question →

125

MCQmedium

A company runs a mix of production and non-production Amazon EC2 instances. The finance team uses AWS Budgets to monitor monthly spending. For the development accounts, the team wants to automatically stop all running EC2 instances when the account's monthly spending reaches 90% of the budgeted amount. The team wants a solution that does not require custom scripting or additional infrastructure. Which AWS Budgets feature should the team configure to meet this requirement?

A.Create a budget alert that sends an email notification to the operations team when spending reaches 90% of the budget.

B.Configure a budget action that applies an IAM policy to deny the ec2:StopInstances permission for all users.

C.Configure a budget action that runs an AWS Systems Manager automation document to stop the EC2 instances.

D.Create a budget alert that publishes a message to an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic, and subscribe an AWS Lambda function to stop the instances.

AnswerC

AWS Budgets actions can trigger an AWS Systems Manager automation document, which can be set to stop EC2 instances. This provides a native, automated solution without requiring custom code or additional services.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets supports budget actions that can automatically trigger AWS Systems Manager automation documents to stop EC2 instances when a budget threshold is exceeded. This meets the requirement of no custom scripting or additional infrastructure, as the automation document is a built-in capability of Systems Manager.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may choose Option D (Lambda + SNS) because it is a common pattern for automation, but the question explicitly requires 'no custom scripting or additional infrastructure,' making the built-in budget action with Systems Manager the correct choice.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because sending an email notification does not automatically stop EC2 instances; it only alerts the operations team, requiring manual intervention. Option B is wrong because denying the ec2:StopInstances permission would prevent users from stopping instances, but the requirement is to stop instances automatically, not to deny permissions. Option D is wrong because while it could technically work, it requires creating and managing an AWS Lambda function (custom scripting) and an SNS topic, which violates the 'no custom scripting or additional infrastructure' requirement.

Practice this question →

126

MCQmedium

A company is planning to migrate its on-premises infrastructure to AWS. The operations team wants to compare the total cost of ownership (TCO) between running workloads on-premises and running them on AWS. They need a tool that can accept details about their current on-premises servers (number of servers, CPU, memory, storage) and produce a detailed report comparing costs over a specified period, including savings from avoided hardware purchases, IT labor, and data center costs. Which AWS tool should the operations team use?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator

C.AWS Pricing Calculator

D.AWS Cost and Usage Report

AnswerB

The AWS TCO Calculator is the correct tool for this scenario. It accepts input about existing on-premises infrastructure and provides a detailed comparison of costs between running on-premises and on AWS, including savings from hardware, labor, and data center expenses. It helps organizations estimate the financial benefits of migration.

Why this answer

The AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator is specifically designed to compare the costs of running on-premises infrastructure versus AWS. It accepts detailed inputs about existing on-premises servers (such as CPU, memory, and storage) and generates a comprehensive report that includes savings from avoided hardware purchases, IT labor, and data center costs over a user-specified period. This directly matches the operations team's requirement for a detailed TCO comparison.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the AWS Pricing Calculator (which estimates AWS service costs) with the TCO Calculator (which compares on-premises vs. AWS costs), leading them to select the Pricing Calculator even though it lacks the on-premises input and comparative savings features.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it is a tool for visualizing, understanding, and managing AWS costs and usage over time, not for comparing on-premises TCO with AWS costs. Option C (AWS Pricing Calculator) is wrong because it is used to estimate the cost of AWS services based on expected usage, but it does not accept on-premises server details or produce a comparative TCO report that includes savings from avoided hardware, IT labor, and data center costs.

Practice this question →

127

MCQmedium

A company runs a production web application on a fleet of Amazon EC2 instances. The operations team has observed that most instances have an average CPU utilization below 10% over the past month. They want to receive automated, ML-based recommendations for downsizing these instances to smaller instance types to reduce costs without compromising performance. The team also wants to see the estimated monthly savings for each recommendation. Which AWS service should the operations team use?

A.AWS Trusted Advisor

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Compute Optimizer

D.AWS Budgets

AnswerC

Correct. AWS Compute Optimizer uses ML to analyze utilization patterns and recommends optimal instance types and sizes, including downsizing opportunities, along with estimated savings.

Why this answer

AWS Compute Optimizer is the correct service because it uses machine learning to analyze historical utilization metrics (such as CPU, memory, and network) of EC2 instances and provides actionable recommendations to downsize or rightsize instances. It specifically generates estimated monthly savings for each recommendation, directly addressing the need for automated, ML-based downsizing suggestions without compromising performance.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Trusted Advisor's cost optimization checks with the ML-driven rightsizing capabilities of AWS Compute Optimizer, but Trusted Advisor does not provide per-instance, ML-based recommendations with estimated savings.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides general best-practice checks (e.g., cost optimization, security, fault tolerance) but does not use machine learning for EC2 rightsizing recommendations and does not offer detailed per-instance estimated monthly savings. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer focuses on visualizing and analyzing historical cost and usage data, not on providing ML-based recommendations for downsizing EC2 instances based on CPU utilization. Option D is wrong because AWS Budgets allows you to set custom cost and usage budgets and receive alerts, but it does not generate automated, ML-based rightsizing recommendations or estimated savings for specific EC2 instances.

Practice this question →

128

MCQmedium

A company runs a production web application on Amazon EC2 and Amazon RDS. The internal IT team needs a support plan that provides a guaranteed response time of less than one hour for a production system outage. Additionally, the company wants access to AWS Infrastructure Event Management, which includes guidance from AWS experts during planned events such as product launches or migrations. The company does not require a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM). Which AWS Support plan should the company choose?

A.Basic Support

B.Developer Support

C.Business Support

D.Enterprise Support

AnswerC

Correct. Business Support provides a 1-hour response time for Severity 1 (production system down) cases and includes access to Infrastructure Event Management. It meets the stated requirements without the higher cost and TAM of Enterprise Support.

Why this answer

The Business Support plan is the correct choice because it provides a guaranteed response time of less than one hour for production system outages (production system impaired) and includes access to AWS Infrastructure Event Management for guidance during planned events. The company does not need a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM), which is only available with the Enterprise Support plan, making Business Support the most cost-effective option that meets all stated requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse the Developer Support plan's 12-hour response time for production outages with the 1-hour response time offered by Business Support, or mistakenly think that Infrastructure Event Management is available on Developer Support, when it is only available on Business and Enterprise tiers.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Basic Support does not provide any guaranteed response times for support cases, nor does it include access to AWS Infrastructure Event Management; it only offers access to documentation, whitepapers, and the AWS Trusted Advisor (basic checks). Option B is wrong because Developer Support provides a response time of less than 12 hours for production system outages (not under 1 hour) and does not include AWS Infrastructure Event Management, which is a feature reserved for Business and Enterprise Support plans.

Practice this question →

129

MCQmedium

A company wants to proactively monitor its AWS spending and receive email notifications when actual or forecasted costs exceed a defined threshold. The company has a monthly budget of $10,000 and wants to be alerted when costs reach 80% of the budget. Which AWS service should the company use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Consolidated Billing

AnswerB

AWS Budgets is the correct service because it enables you to set custom cost and usage budgets and define threshold alerts that trigger email notifications (or actions via Amazon SNS) when actual or forecasted costs exceed specified percentages of the budget. This directly meets the requirement for proactive monitoring and alerts at the 80% threshold.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set custom cost and usage budgets, and configure alerts that trigger when actual or forecasted costs exceed a defined threshold (e.g., 80% of a $10,000 monthly budget). It can send email notifications via Amazon SNS when the threshold is breached, meeting the proactive monitoring requirement.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse AWS Cost Explorer's forecasting capability with proactive alerting, but Cost Explorer does not send automatic notifications; AWS Budgets is the service designed specifically for threshold-based alerts.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (AWS Cost Explorer) is wrong because it provides historical cost visualization and forecasting, but does not natively support threshold-based alerts or email notifications; it requires manual analysis. Option C (AWS Trusted Advisor) is wrong because it inspects your AWS environment for cost optimization, security, and performance best practices, but it does not offer configurable budget alerts or threshold-based notifications. Option D (AWS Consolidated Billing) is wrong because it aggregates costs across multiple accounts for billing purposes, but it does not provide proactive alerting or threshold-based notifications on its own.

Practice this question →

130

Matchingmedium

Match each AWS compute service to its typical use case.

Drag a concept onto its matching description — or click a concept then click the description.

Concepts

Matches

Full control over virtual servers

Run code without provisioning servers

Run containerized applications

Run Kubernetes containers

Serverless compute for containers

Why these pairings

Different compute services cater to different needs.

Practice this question →

131

MCQeasy

Which AWS offering provides free, self-paced online training courses, videos, and labs to help customers learn AWS services and pass certification exams?

A.AWS Partner Network (APN)

B.AWS Skill Builder

C.AWS Certification

D.AWS Marketplace

AnswerB

AWS Skill Builder provides free and paid digital training including courses, videos, labs, learning plans, and practice exams to help learners build and validate AWS skills.

Why this answer

AWS Skill Builder is the official AWS training portal that offers free, self-paced online training courses, videos, and hands-on labs. It is specifically designed to help individuals learn AWS services and prepare for AWS Certification exams, including the CLF-C02. Unlike other options, Skill Builder directly provides the described learning resources at no cost.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Certification (the exam itself) with the training resources needed to prepare for it, leading them to select option C instead of recognizing that AWS Skill Builder is the dedicated training platform.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Partner Network (APN) is a program for organizations and consultants who build solutions on AWS, providing business, technical, and marketing support, but it does not offer free self-paced training courses and labs for individual learners. Option C is wrong because AWS Certification is the credentialing program that validates cloud expertise through exams; it does not itself provide training content, videos, or labs. Option D is wrong because AWS Marketplace is a digital catalog of third-party software and services that run on AWS, not a training platform for learning AWS services or preparing for certifications.

Practice this question →

132

MCQeasy

A company runs non-critical batch analytics jobs that can be paused and restarted if interrupted. The jobs are flexible regarding when they run. Which EC2 purchasing option offers the lowest possible cost for this workload?

A.On-Demand Instances

B.Reserved Instances

C.Spot Instances

D.Dedicated Instances

AnswerC

Spot Instances use spare AWS capacity at discounts up to 90%. Since the batch jobs can be paused and restarted when interrupted, they are perfectly suited for Spot, achieving the lowest possible compute cost.

Why this answer

Spot Instances offer the lowest possible cost because they use spare AWS EC2 capacity at a steep discount (up to 90% off On-Demand). Since the batch analytics jobs are non-critical, can be paused and restarted, and are flexible regarding when they run, they are an ideal fit for Spot Instances, which can be interrupted with a 2-minute warning when capacity is reclaimed.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often choose Reserved Instances thinking they always provide the best discount, but they fail to recognize that Spot Instances can be even cheaper for fault-tolerant, flexible workloads that can handle interruptions.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because On-Demand Instances provide full pricing flexibility but at the highest per-hour cost, making them unsuitable for minimizing costs. Option B is wrong because Reserved Instances offer a discount in exchange for a 1- or 3-year commitment, which is unnecessary for flexible, interruptible workloads and does not achieve the lowest possible cost. Option D is wrong because Dedicated Instances are physically isolated at the host hardware level and incur additional charges, making them the most expensive option for this use case.

Practice this question →

133

MCQmedium

A company runs multiple workloads on AWS, each in separate AWS accounts managed through AWS Organizations. The finance team wants to set a monthly cost threshold of $5,000 for the 'development' account. If the actual or forecasted costs exceed 80% of this threshold, the team wants to receive an email alert so they can review usage and take corrective action if needed. They also want to track costs against this threshold over time using a dashboard. Which AWS service should the finance team use to set up this threshold and receive the alerts?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Organizations

AnswerB

AWS Budgets enables you to set custom cost and usage budgets and receive alerts when actual or forecasted costs exceed your defined thresholds. You can also track budget progress on the AWS Budgets dashboard. This matches the requirement perfectly.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets allows you to set custom cost and usage budgets with alerts based on actual or forecasted costs. In this scenario, you can create a budget for the 'development' account with a $5,000 monthly threshold and configure an alert at 80% ($4,000) to send an email notification. AWS Budgets also integrates with Amazon QuickSight or Cost Explorer for historical tracking, but the budget itself provides a dashboard view of current and forecasted spend against the threshold.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's visualization capabilities with the proactive alerting and threshold-setting functionality that only AWS Budgets provides, leading them to choose Cost Explorer for a task it cannot perform.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a visualization and analysis tool for historical cost data, not a service for setting thresholds or proactive alerts; it lacks the ability to define a budget limit and send email notifications when costs exceed a percentage. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor inspects your environment for best practices in cost optimization, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but it does not allow you to set custom cost thresholds or receive alerts based on account-level spending limits. Option D is wrong because AWS Organizations is a service for centrally managing multiple AWS accounts, including policy-based management and consolidated billing, but it does not provide per-account budget threshold alerts or email notifications; it can be used to apply service control policies (SCPs) but not cost-based alerts.

Practice this question →

134

MCQmedium

A company runs a production application on a mix of Amazon EC2 instance families (e.g., M5, C5, R5) across two AWS Regions. The application runs 24/7 and is expected to continue for the next three years. The company wants to minimize compute costs while retaining the flexibility to change instance families, sizes, or Regions if needed. The company also prefers to avoid any upfront payment to preserve cash flow. Which AWS pricing option should the company choose?

A.On-Demand instances

B.Standard Reserved Instances (no upfront, 3-year term)

C.Compute Savings Plans (no upfront, 3-year term)

D.Spot Instances

AnswerC

Compute Savings Plans offer flexible compute coverage across EC2 instance families, sizes, Regions, OS, and tenancy. The 3-year term with no upfront payment provides cost savings without an initial cash outlay, exactly meeting the stated needs.

Why this answer

Compute Savings Plans (no upfront, 3-year term) provide the highest discount (up to 66%) while allowing flexibility to change instance families (e.g., M5 to C5), sizes, and AWS Regions. This matches the company’s requirement to minimize costs over three years without upfront payment, and the plan automatically applies to any EC2 instance usage within the chosen commitment, preserving the ability to switch instance types or Regions as needed.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Reserved Instances with Savings Plans, assuming RIs offer the same flexibility, but Standard RIs are region- and instance-family-specific, while Compute Savings Plans provide cross-family and cross-Region flexibility.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because On-Demand instances offer no discount and would result in the highest compute cost over three years, failing to minimize costs. Option B is wrong because Standard Reserved Instances (no upfront, 3-year term) lock the company to a specific instance family, size, and Region, eliminating the flexibility to change instance families, sizes, or Regions without incurring additional costs or forfeiting the discount.

Practice this question →

135

MCQmedium

A company received an unexpected AWS bill that was much higher than expected. Which AWS service would help them understand which resource or service caused the cost spike?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Pricing Calculator

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerB

Cost Explorer lets customers filter and group costs by service, resource, and time to pinpoint exactly which service caused an unexpected cost increase.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer (B) is the correct service because it provides a pre-built dashboard and reports that allow you to visualize, analyze, and drill down into your AWS costs and usage over time. You can filter by service, linked account, region, or resource tags to identify exactly which resource or service caused the unexpected cost spike. AWS Budgets (A) can alert you when costs exceed a threshold, but it does not provide the historical analysis and granular breakdown needed to pinpoint the root cause of a past spike.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse AWS Budgets (a proactive alerting tool) with AWS Cost Explorer (a reactive analysis tool), mistakenly thinking that setting a budget will help them understand the cause of a past spike, when in fact budgets only alert on future thresholds and do not provide historical drill-down capabilities.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets is a proactive alerting tool that notifies you when costs or usage exceed a defined budget threshold, but it does not provide the detailed historical cost and usage analysis needed to investigate a past spike. Option C is wrong because AWS Pricing Calculator is a planning tool used to estimate future costs based on expected usage, not a tool for analyzing actual incurred costs or identifying the source of a past bill increase. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor is an advisory service that inspects your AWS environment and makes recommendations for cost optimization, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but it does not provide a granular breakdown of historical cost data by resource or service.

Practice this question →

136

MCQmedium

A company wants to ensure they never spend more than $500 per month on AWS services. Which AWS feature can automatically stop or terminate resources when cost projections reach a threshold?

A.AWS Budgets with budget alerts only

B.AWS Budgets Actions

C.AWS Cost Explorer spending forecasts

D.AWS Service Quotas

AnswerB

AWS Budgets Actions can automatically apply IAM policies to deny further usage, stop EC2/RDS instances, or trigger custom Lambda responses when budget thresholds are exceeded.

Why this answer

AWS Budgets Actions allow you to define cost and usage budgets with automated responses, such as stopping or terminating EC2 instances, when actual or forecasted costs exceed a specified threshold. This directly meets the requirement to enforce a $500 monthly spending limit without manual intervention. Budget alerts alone only notify you; they do not take automated actions.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse budget alerts (which only notify) with Budgets Actions (which automate responses), leading them to select Option A because they overlook the requirement for automatic resource termination.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets with budget alerts only send notifications (e.g., email or SNS) when costs exceed thresholds, but they cannot automatically stop or terminate resources. Option C is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer spending forecasts provide visual predictions of future costs but have no capability to trigger automated actions on resources. Option D is wrong because AWS Service Quotas manage service limits (e.g., maximum number of instances) and do not monitor or control spending thresholds or terminate resources.

Practice this question →

137

MCQhard

A company has 10 EC2 On-Demand instances running. They purchase a 1-year Compute Savings Plan for a commitment equivalent to 6 instances. What happens to the remaining 4 instances' cost?

A.The remaining 4 instances are free since the Savings Plan covers all usage

B.The remaining 4 instances are charged at On-Demand rates

C.The remaining 4 instances are charged at Spot Instance rates

D.AWS suspends the 4 excess instances to enforce the Savings Plan limit

AnswerB

Savings Plans apply the discount to eligible usage up to the hourly commitment. Usage exceeding the commitment is charged at On-Demand rates — the Savings Plan doesn't cover it.

Why this answer

A Compute Savings Plan applies to any EC2 instance usage up to the committed hourly amount (in this case, equivalent to 6 instances). Usage beyond that commitment is charged at standard On-Demand rates. Therefore, the remaining 4 instances are billed at On-Demand prices because the Savings Plan does not cover usage exceeding the commitment.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume a Savings Plan covers all usage or that AWS will automatically adjust pricing or terminate instances to enforce the plan, when in reality AWS simply bills excess usage at On-Demand rates without any service disruption.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because a Savings Plan does not make all usage free; it only applies a discounted rate up to the committed amount, and any excess usage is charged at On-Demand rates. Option C is wrong because Spot Instance rates are only applicable to Spot Instances, which are not automatically applied to On-Demand instances; the Savings Plan does not convert excess On-Demand instances to Spot pricing. Option D is wrong because AWS does not suspend or terminate instances to enforce a Savings Plan limit; it simply bills any usage beyond the commitment at standard On-Demand rates.

Practice this question →

138

MCQmedium

A company has been running multiple workloads on AWS for the past six months. The finance team needs to analyze historical spending to identify month-over-month trends by AWS service and by individual linked accounts. The team requires a graphical, interactive tool that allows them to apply custom date ranges and filters, and view the results as customizable charts and graphs. Which AWS service should the finance team use to meet this requirement?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Trusted Advisor

D.AWS Consolidated Billing

AnswerB

AWS Cost Explorer provides an intuitive graphical interface to explore and visualize AWS costs and usage over time. You can filter by service, linked account, region, and more, and create custom reports for month-over-month trend analysis. This makes it the correct choice for historical spending analysis.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer provides a graphical interface with pre-built charts and graphs that allow users to visualize historical spending trends. It supports filtering by AWS service and linked accounts, and enables custom date ranges for month-over-month analysis, making it the correct choice for the finance team's requirements.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may confuse AWS Budgets' alerting capabilities with Cost Explorer's analytical features, or assume Trusted Advisor's cost optimization checks include historical trend visualization, when in fact only Cost Explorer provides the required interactive graphical analysis.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets is designed for setting spending limits and sending alerts when thresholds are exceeded, not for analyzing historical spending trends with interactive charts and graphs. Option C is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor provides recommendations for cost optimization, performance, security, and fault tolerance, but it does not offer customizable, graphical historical spending analysis by service or linked account.

Practice this question →

139

MCQmedium

A company currently pays $50,000/month for on-premises infrastructure. They project that running the equivalent workload on AWS will cost $35,000/month including all data transfer. What is the annual AWS cost savings?

A.$15,000

B.$180,000

C.$420,000

D.$600,000

AnswerB

Monthly savings: $50,000 - $35,000 = $15,000. Annual savings: $15,000 × 12 months = $180,000.

Why this answer

The monthly cost savings are $50,000 - $35,000 = $15,000. Annualizing this gives $15,000 × 12 = $180,000. Option B is correct because it correctly multiplies the monthly savings by 12 to compute the annual savings.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse monthly savings with annual savings, or mistakenly calculate the annual cost of one environment instead of the difference, leading them to pick Option A, C, or D.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because it represents the monthly savings ($15,000) rather than the annual savings, failing to multiply by 12. Option C is wrong because it incorrectly calculates annual savings as $35,000 × 12 = $420,000, which is the annual AWS cost, not the savings. Option D is wrong because it incorrectly calculates annual savings as $50,000 × 12 = $600,000, which is the annual on-premises cost, not the savings.

Practice this question →

140

MCQmedium

A company uses AWS Organizations. The management account receives the consolidated bill. Which statement about Reserved Instance discount sharing in AWS Organizations is correct?

A.Reserved Instance discounts only apply to the account that purchased the RI

B.RI discounts are automatically shared across all member accounts in the organization

C.RI discounts are only shared if the management account explicitly enables sharing for each RI

D.RI discounts cannot be shared across accounts even in an Organization

AnswerB

Consolidated billing enables automatic RI discount sharing — unused RI capacity in any member account offsets On-Demand charges in other member accounts, maximizing discount utilization.

Why this answer

In AWS Organizations, Reserved Instance (RI) discounts are automatically shared across all accounts in the organization, provided the accounts are under the same consolidated billing family and the RIs are in the same AWS region. This means that if one member account purchases an RI, the hourly cost benefit can apply to qualifying usage from any other account in the organization, reducing the overall bill. The management account receives the consolidated bill and can see the aggregated savings, but no explicit sharing configuration is required.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often assume RI discounts are account-specific or require manual sharing, but AWS automatically shares them across all accounts in an organization under consolidated billing, which is a core concept tested in the CLF-C02 exam.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because RI discounts are not limited to the purchasing account; they are automatically shared across all accounts in the organization under consolidated billing. Option C is wrong because AWS does not require the management account to explicitly enable sharing for each RI; sharing is automatic for all RIs in the organization. Option D is wrong because RI discounts can indeed be shared across accounts within an AWS Organization, which is a key benefit of consolidated billing.

Practice this question →

141

MCQmedium

A startup is planning a new web application on AWS. The architecture will use Amazon EC2 for compute, Amazon RDS for the database, and Amazon S3 for static assets. The team needs to estimate the monthly cost of running this application before building it. They want to compare costs across different instance types, regions, and pricing models (On-Demand vs. Reserved Instances), and they also need to account for data transfer costs. Which AWS tool should the team use to create this estimate?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator

C.AWS Budgets

D.AWS Pricing Calculator

AnswerD

The AWS Pricing Calculator enables users to estimate the monthly cost of AWS services by selecting specific configurations (e.g., EC2 instance type, RDS database class, S3 storage class, etc.), regions, and pricing models. It provides a detailed cost breakdown and is the correct tool for pre-deployment cost estimation.

Why this answer

AWS Pricing Calculator (formerly AWS Simple Monthly Calculator) is the correct tool because it allows users to estimate monthly costs by selecting specific EC2 instance types, RDS configurations, S3 storage classes, and data transfer volumes. It supports comparing On-Demand vs. Reserved Instance pricing across different regions, making it ideal for pre-build cost estimation.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing cost estimation tools (Pricing Calculator) with cost management tools (Cost Explorer, Budgets) or TCO analysis, leading candidates to pick a tool that analyzes past spend rather than future projections.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer analyzes historical cost and usage data, not future estimates for a planned architecture. Option B is wrong because the AWS TCO Calculator compares on-premises vs. AWS costs, not detailed monthly estimates across instance types and pricing models.

Option C is wrong because AWS Budgets sets cost alerts and tracks actual spend against a budget, not for creating upfront cost estimates.

Practice this question →

142

Drag & Dropmedium

Drag and drop the steps to set up a VPC with a public subnet and an internet gateway in the correct order.

Drag steps to the numbered slots on the right, or tap a step then tap a slot.

Steps

Order

Why this order

VPC creation, subnet, internet gateway, routing, and association are the standard steps for a public subnet.

Practice this question →

143

MCQmedium

A company operates a critical e-commerce platform on AWS that generates significant revenue. The management team requires a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) to provide proactive guidance and operational best practices. Additionally, they need the fastest possible response time for critical system failures, targeting a response within 15 minutes. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose?

A.Basic Support

B.Business Support

C.Enterprise On-Ramp Support

D.Enterprise Support

AnswerD

Correct. Enterprise Support provides a dedicated TAM and the fastest response time of 15 minutes for business-critical systems, fully meeting the company's requirements.

Why this answer

The company requires a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) and the fastest possible response time for critical system failures (15-minute response). Only the Enterprise Support plan includes a designated TAM and provides a 15-minute response time for business-critical system failures. The Enterprise On-Ramp Support plan offers a TAM but has a longer 30-minute response time for critical cases, and the Business Support plan does not include a TAM at all.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse Enterprise On-Ramp Support with Enterprise Support, assuming both offer the same response times and TAM access, but Enterprise On-Ramp has a longer 30-minute critical response and a different TAM engagement model.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Basic Support provides only account and billing support, no TAM, and no defined response times for technical issues. Option B is wrong because Business Support offers a 1-hour response time for critical system failures and does not include a dedicated TAM. Option C is wrong because Enterprise On-Ramp Support includes a TAM but provides a 30-minute response time for critical cases, not the fastest 15-minute response required.

Practice this question →

144

MCQmedium

A company uses multiple AWS accounts and needs to perform granular cost and usage analysis using standard SQL queries. The cloud operations team requires the most detailed data possible, including resource-level attributes such as instance type, usage quantity, and cost allocation tags. This data must be automatically delivered to an Amazon S3 bucket on a daily basis for long-term retention and querying. Which AWS service should the company use to generate this dataset?

A.AWS Cost Explorer

B.AWS Budgets

C.AWS Cost and Usage Report

D.AWS Pricing Calculator

AnswerC

The AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) contains the most detailed billing and usage data, including individual resource IDs, tags, and hourly usage. It is delivered to an Amazon S3 bucket in a structured format (CSV or Parquet) and can be queried with Amazon Athena, making it the correct choice for granular SQL-based cost analysis.

Why this answer

AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) is the correct choice because it provides the most detailed cost and usage data available, including resource-level attributes like instance type, usage quantity, and cost allocation tags. It can be automatically delivered to an Amazon S3 bucket on a daily basis and supports querying with standard SQL via AWS Athena or Amazon Redshift Spectrum, meeting the requirements for granular analysis and long-term retention.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's visual analytics with the raw data export capability of CUR, assuming Cost Explorer can provide the same detailed, queryable dataset when it only offers aggregated views.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides visual dashboards and high-level cost trends, but it does not generate raw, resource-level datasets that can be automatically delivered to S3 for SQL querying. Option B is wrong because AWS Budgets is used for setting cost thresholds and sending alerts, not for generating detailed cost and usage reports with resource-level attributes. Option D is wrong because AWS Pricing Calculator is a tool for estimating costs of AWS services before deployment, not for generating historical cost and usage data.

Practice this question →

145

MCQmedium

A company's IT director wants to present a business case for migrating from on-premises infrastructure to AWS. They need to compare the full cost of running on-premises (hardware, facilities, power, labour) against the cost of running equivalent workloads on AWS. Which AWS tool helps create this comparison?

A.AWS Pricing Calculator

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS TCO Calculator

D.AWS Budgets

AnswerC

The AWS TCO Calculator is designed specifically for comparing on-premises infrastructure total cost of ownership with equivalent AWS costs. It accounts for hardware, software licenses, facilities, networking, and labour costs.

Why this answer

Option C is correct because the AWS TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) Calculator is specifically designed to compare the full costs of running on-premises infrastructure (including hardware, facilities, power, and labor) against the equivalent costs on AWS. It generates a detailed side-by-side cost comparison report, helping IT directors build a business case for migration by quantifying potential savings.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse the AWS Pricing Calculator (which only estimates AWS service costs) with the TCO Calculator (which compares on-premises vs. AWS total costs), leading them to select Option A instead of C.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the AWS Pricing Calculator estimates the cost of AWS services based on usage inputs, but it does not compare on-premises costs or include facilities, power, or labor expenses. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer analyzes historical AWS spending and forecasts future costs, but it cannot model on-premises infrastructure costs or perform a TCO comparison. Option D is wrong because AWS Budgets sets custom cost and usage budgets and sends alerts, but it does not provide any cost comparison or TCO analysis between on-premises and AWS environments.

Practice this question →

146

MCQmedium

A company is evaluating a migration of its on-premises virtualized workloads to AWS. The CFO wants to understand the potential cost savings over a three-year period by shifting from capital expenditure (hardware purchases) to operational expenditure (pay-as-you-go). The team needs a tool that can provide a detailed comparison of the total cost of ownership (TCO) for the current on-premises environment versus running the same workloads on AWS, including hardware, software, labor, and facilities costs. Which AWS tool should the team use?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerC

The AWS TCO Calculator is designed to compare the total cost of ownership of an existing on-premises environment with AWS, factoring in hardware, software, labor, facilities, and other costs. It produces a detailed report that helps organizations estimate the cost savings of migrating to AWS.

Why this answer

The AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator is specifically designed to compare the costs of running workloads on-premises versus on AWS. It allows users to input details about their current on-premises infrastructure—including hardware, software, labor, and facilities—and generates a detailed side-by-side cost comparison over a specified period (e.g., three years). This directly addresses the CFO's need to understand potential savings from shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) to operational expenditure (OpEx).

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates confuse the TCO Calculator with AWS Cost Explorer, assuming both provide cost comparisons, but Cost Explorer only shows historical AWS spend, not a forward-looking comparison with on-premises costs.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets is a tool for setting custom cost and usage budgets and sending alerts when thresholds are exceeded; it does not provide a comparative TCO analysis between on-premises and AWS environments. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a tool for visualizing, understanding, and managing AWS costs and usage over time, but it only analyzes costs already incurred on AWS, not a comparison with on-premises costs.

Practice this question →

147

MCQmedium

A company uses AWS Organizations with multiple accounts. The finance team needs to generate custom cost and usage reports that include every line item, all user-defined cost allocation tags, and resource-level details. The team also needs the ability to query the data using standard SQL tools for in-depth analysis. Which AWS feature should the team use to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Budgets

B.AWS Cost Explorer

C.AWS Cost and Usage Report

D.AWS Trusted Advisor

AnswerC

AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) delivers the most detailed cost and usage data, including all tags and resource-level line items. It can be stored in Amazon S3 and queried with Amazon Athena for SQL-based analysis, making it ideal for custom reporting needs.

Why this answer

The AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) is the only AWS feature that provides comprehensive, granular cost and usage data including every line item, all user-defined cost allocation tags, and resource-level details. It delivers this data to an Amazon S3 bucket in a CSV or Parquet format, which can then be queried using standard SQL tools via Amazon Athena or other SQL engines. This directly matches the requirement for custom reports and SQL-based analysis.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's filtering and grouping capabilities with the raw, line-item export functionality of the Cost and Usage Report, not realizing that Cost Explorer cannot provide every line item with all user-defined tags or support direct SQL querying.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Budgets is a cost monitoring and alerting tool that tracks spending against thresholds, not a reporting service that generates detailed line-item data with tags and resource details. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer provides pre-built visualizations and filters for cost data, but it does not export every line item with all user-defined tags and cannot be queried directly with standard SQL tools. Option D is wrong because AWS Trusted Advisor is an optimization service that inspects your environment for cost savings, performance, and security best practices, and it does not generate cost and usage reports or support SQL queries.

Practice this question →

148

MCQeasy

Which AWS Cost Management tool provides daily forecasts and allows customers to track Reserved Instance and Savings Plans utilization and coverage?

A.AWS Pricing Calculator

B.AWS Cost and Usage Report

C.AWS Cost Explorer

D.AWS Budgets

AnswerC

Cost Explorer provides built-in views for daily cost trends, RI/Savings Plans utilization and coverage, forecasts, and right-sizing recommendations.

Why this answer

AWS Cost Explorer provides daily cost and usage forecasts for up to 12 months ahead and includes dedicated views for Reserved Instance (RI) and Savings Plans utilization and coverage. This allows customers to monitor how much of their reserved capacity is being used and whether their commitments are adequately covering actual usage.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer's forecasting and utilization tracking capabilities with AWS Budgets, which only provides alerting based on thresholds, not the detailed utilization and coverage analysis for Reserved Instances and Savings Plans.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Pricing Calculator is a tool for estimating future costs based on expected usage, not for tracking actual utilization or providing forecasts of existing Reserved Instance or Savings Plans coverage. Option B is wrong because AWS Cost and Usage Report (CUR) is a detailed, raw data export of cost and usage metrics, but it does not offer built-in daily forecasts or pre-built RI/Savings Plans utilization and coverage dashboards. Option D is wrong because AWS Budgets allows you to set cost and usage thresholds and receive alerts, but it does not provide daily forecasts or track RI/Savings Plans utilization and coverage directly.

Practice this question →

149

MCQmedium

A startup is planning to build and launch a new mobile application on AWS. The team expects very low initial traffic but hopes to scale rapidly. They have a limited budget and want to avoid any upfront costs. They are unsure which AWS services they will need and want to estimate their monthly AWS charges before committing to an architecture. Additionally, they need access to technical support to help troubleshoot issues that arise during development and production, with a guaranteed response time of less than 12 hours for production-impacting issues. Which combination of AWS tool and support plan should the startup choose to meet these requirements?

A.AWS Pricing Calculator + Developer Support

B.AWS Cost Explorer + Basic Support

C.AWS Budgets + Business Support

D.AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator + Enterprise Support

AnswerA

Correct. The AWS Pricing Calculator lets you estimate monthly costs for AWS services before building the architecture. The Developer Support plan offers a response time of less than 12 hours for production issues that impair the system, which meets the stated requirement. This combination is cost-effective for a startup with limited budget.

Why this answer

The AWS Pricing Calculator allows the startup to estimate monthly costs without any upfront commitment, which aligns with their need to avoid upfront costs and predict charges before architecting. The Developer Support plan provides a response time of less than 12 hours for production-impacting issues (specifically, a response time of 12 hours for impaired production systems under the Developer plan), meeting their support requirement while keeping costs low for a startup with limited budget.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates often confuse AWS Cost Explorer (a historical analysis tool) with the AWS Pricing Calculator (a future estimation tool), and they may assume Basic Support includes support SLAs when it does not, leading them to choose Option B incorrectly.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because AWS Cost Explorer is a tool for analyzing historical cost data, not for estimating future charges before committing to an architecture, and Basic Support does not include any guaranteed response times for production-impacting issues (it only provides documentation and community forums). Option C is wrong because AWS Budgets is used to set cost alerts and monitor spending, not to estimate monthly charges upfront, and Business Support provides a 1-hour response time for production-impacting issues, which exceeds the required 12-hour guarantee but is more expensive than needed. Option D is wrong because the AWS Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Calculator is designed to compare on-premises vs.

AWS costs, not to estimate monthly AWS service charges for a new application, and Enterprise Support includes a 15-minute response time for business-critical issues, which is overkill and costly for a startup with limited budget.

Practice this question →

150

MCQmedium

A company runs a production e-commerce application on AWS. The CIO requires that the company have access to AWS technical support with a response time of under 1 hour for critical production system failures. Additionally, the operations team wants to use AWS Trusted Advisor to get recommendations on cost optimization, performance, and security for all AWS resources. The company already pays for AWS Business Support for its development account but wants the minimum-cost support plan that meets these requirements for its production account. Which AWS Support plan should the company choose for the production account?

A.AWS Basic Support

B.AWS Developer Support

C.AWS Business Support

D.AWS Enterprise Support

AnswerC

AWS Business Support provides a 1-hour response time for critical production system failures and includes full access to all AWS Trusted Advisor checks. This matches the company's requirements at a lower cost than Enterprise Support, making it the correct and most cost-effective choice.

Why this answer

AWS Business Support is the minimum plan that provides a 1-hour response time for critical production system failures and full access to AWS Trusted Advisor, including cost optimization, performance, and security checks. AWS Basic and Developer Support do not offer a 1-hour response time for critical failures, and Developer Support only provides limited Trusted Advisor checks. Therefore, Business Support meets both requirements at the lowest cost for the production account.

Exam trap

The trap here is that candidates may assume Developer Support is sufficient because it includes technical support, but they overlook the specific 1-hour response time requirement and the need for full Trusted Advisor recommendations, which only Business Support provides.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because AWS Basic Support does not provide any technical support response time guarantees or access to Trusted Advisor recommendations beyond the basic security checks. Option B is wrong because AWS Developer Support offers a maximum response time of 12 hours for critical failures, not under 1 hour, and only provides limited Trusted Advisor checks (core security checks), not full cost optimization, performance, and security recommendations.

Practice this question →