Route Maps and Route Filtering

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route filtering issue. Router R1 is advertising a prefix 10.1.1.0/24 to its eBGP neighbor R2, but R2 is not receiving it. The engineer checks R1's BGP configuration and sees a route-map named FILTER-OUT applied outbound to the neighbor. The route-map references an ACL that permits 10.1.1.0/24, but the prefix is still not being sent. What is the most likely cause?

Question 3hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a redistribution issue between OSPF and EIGRP. Router R3 is redistributing OSPF routes into EIGRP, but some OSPF external routes are not appearing in the EIGRP topology table. The engineer checks the redistribute command under EIGRP and sees a route-map named RM-OSPF that uses a prefix-list to match specific prefixes. The missing routes are permitted by the prefix-list. What is the most likely cause?

Question 4mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a PBR (Policy-Based Routing) issue on router R5. The engineer configured a route-map to set the next-hop for traffic from a specific source subnet. The route-map is applied to the incoming interface, but traffic from the source subnet is still being forwarded using the regular routing table. The engineer verifies that the ACL matches the traffic correctly. What is the most likely cause?

Question 5hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route filtering problem with prefix-lists. Router R6 is using a prefix-list to filter routes from a BGP neighbor. The prefix-list is configured to permit only 192.168.0.0/16 and 192.168.1.0/24, but routes with prefix 192.168.2.0/24 are also being accepted. The engineer checks the prefix-list configuration and sees only two permit statements. What is the most likely cause?

Question 6hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a redistribution loop between OSPF and EIGRP. Router R7 is redistributing EIGRP routes into OSPF, and also redistributing OSPF routes into EIGRP. The engineer notices that some OSPF routes are appearing in the EIGRP topology table with a higher metric than expected, causing suboptimal routing. What is the most likely cause?

Question 7mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route-map that is supposed to set a community value on routes from a specific neighbor. The engineer configures a route-map with 'set community 100:100' and applies it inbound to the neighbor. After the configuration, the engineer checks the BGP table on the local router and sees that the routes do not have the community set. What is the most likely cause?

Question 8mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route filtering issue using distribute-lists under OSPF. Router R8 has a distribute-list out applied to the OSPF process to filter routes being advertised to a specific neighbor. The distribute-list references an ACL that denies a specific prefix, but the prefix is still being advertised to the neighbor. What is the most likely cause?

Question 9hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a PBR route-map that is supposed to set the next-hop for traffic from a specific source to a different next-hop. The route-map is applied to the incoming interface, and the ACL matches the traffic. However, the engineer notices that the traffic is still being forwarded using the routing table. The engineer checks the route-map and sees that the 'set ip next-hop' command points to an IP address that is not reachable. What is the most likely result?

Question 10mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route-map that is supposed to prepend AS-path to routes from a specific neighbor. The engineer configures a route-map with 'set as-path prepend 65001' and applies it outbound to the neighbor. After the configuration, the engineer checks the BGP table on the neighbor and sees that the AS-path does not include the prepended AS. What is the most likely cause?

Question 11mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show route-map

route-map FILTER_OSPF, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list OSPF_ROUTES

Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map FILTER_OSPF, deny, sequence 20 Match clauses: Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Based on this output, which statement is correct?

Question 12hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.1.2 advertised-routes

BGP table version is 14, local router ID is 10.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.10.10.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i *> 10.20.20.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i

Total number of prefixes 2

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 13mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip policy
Interface   Route-map

FastEthernet0/0 PBR_MAP

R1# show route-map PBR_MAP

route-map PBR_MAP, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list MATCH_HTTP

Set clauses:

ip next-hop 10.10.10.2

Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Based on this output, what is the most likely problem?

Question 14hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip eigrp topology 10.10.10.0/24

IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 10.10.10.0/24 State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 131072 Routing Descriptor Blocks:

10.1.1.2 (FastEthernet0/0), from 10.1.1.2, Send flag is 0x0

Composite metric is (131072/128256), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 10000 Kbit Total delay is 100 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 1

R1# show ip route 10.10.10.0

Routing entry for 10.10.10.0/24 Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 131072, type internal Last update from 10.1.1.2 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:12 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* 10.1.1.2, from 10.1.1.2, 00:00:12 ago, via FastEthernet0/0

Route metric is 131072, traffic share count is 1

R1# show ip eigrp interfaces
Interface         Peers    Xmit Queue   Mean   Pacing Time   Multicast    Pending

Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer Routes Fa0/0 1 0/0 10 0/10 50 0 Fa0/1 0 0/0 0 0/10 50 0

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 15mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip ospf database

OSPF Router with ID (10.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)

Router Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count

10.1.1.1        10.1.1.1        100         0x80000001 0x00A0B0 1
10.2.2.2        10.2.2.2        200         0x80000003 0x00C0D0 2

Net Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

10.1.1.2        10.1.1.2        150         0x80000001 0x00E0F0

R1# show ip route ospf
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
O       10.2.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.1.1.2, 00:10:00, FastEthernet0/0

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 16hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show bgp ipv4 unicast 10.10.10.0/24

BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.0/24, version 5 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local

10.1.1.2 from 10.1.1.2 (10.2.2.2)

Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0 (received-only)

Based on this output, what does the "(received-only)" flag indicate?

Question 17mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.1.2

BGP neighbor is 192.168.1.2, remote AS 65001, external link BGP version 4, remote router ID 10.2.2.2 BGP state = Established, up for 00:15:00 Last read 00:00:05, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds

Neighbor sessions:

1 active, is multisession capable

Neighbor capabilities:

Route refresh: advertised and received(new) Four-octets ASN: advertised and received Address family IPv4 Unicast: advertised and received Enhanced Refresh: advertised Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent Rcvd Opens: 1 1 Notifications: 0 0 Updates: 10 5 Keepalives: 15 15 Route Refresh: 0 0 Total: 26 21 Default minimum time between advertisement runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast Session: 192.168.1.2 BGP table version 14, neighbor version 14/0 Output queue size : 0 Index 1, Advertise bit 0 1 update-group member Incoming update prefix filter list: FILTER_IN Outgoing update prefix filter list: FILTER_OUT Sent Rcvd Prefixes: 2 2 Updates: 10 5

Based on this output, what is the effect of the prefix lists?

Question 18hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip route vrf CUSTOMER_A

Routing Table: CUSTOMER_A Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override

Gateway of last resort is not set

10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
B       10.10.10.0/24 [200/0] via 192.168.1.2, 00:10:00
B       10.20.20.0/24 [200/0] via 192.168.1.2, 00:10:00

R1# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER_A

BGP table version is 6, local router ID is 10.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path Route Distinguisher: 100:1 (default for vrf CUSTOMER_A) *> 10.10.10.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i *> 10.20.20.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i *> 10.30.30.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i

Based on this output, what is the likely issue?

Question 19hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 10.1.1.2 advertised-routes

BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 10.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 10.20.20.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i

R1# show route-map

route-map BLOCK_RFC1918, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list RFC1918

Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map BLOCK_RFC1918, deny, sequence 20 Match clauses: Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

R1# show ip prefix-list RFC1918
ip prefix-list RFC1918: 3 entries

seq 5 deny 10.0.0.0/8 le 32 seq

10 deny 172.16.0.0/12 le 32

seq

15 deny 192.168.0.0/16 le 32

seq

20 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

Based on this output, what is the most likely issue?

Question 20mediummultiple choice

Examine the following partial configuration on R1:

!--- R1 configuration route-map RMAP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PL-1 set metric 100 ! route-map RMAP permit 20 set metric 200 !

router eigrp 100
 network 10.0.0.0

redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 route-map RMAP !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 21mediummultiple choice

Consider the following configuration on router R2:

!--- R2 configuration

ip prefix-list FILTER seq 5 deny 10.1.0.0/16 le 24
ip prefix-list FILTER seq 
10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

! route-map BGP-IN permit 10 match ip address prefix-list FILTER !

router bgp 65000
 neighbor 192.168.1.1 route-map BGP-IN in

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 22mediummultiple choice

Examine the following configuration on R3:

!--- R3 configuration

access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 
10 deny   any

! route-map OSPF-REDIST permit 10 match ip address 10 set metric-type type-1 !

router ospf 1

redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map OSPF-REDIST !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 23mediummultiple choice

Router R4 has the following configuration:

!--- R4 configuration route-map SETTAG permit 10 match tag 100 set tag 200 ! route-map SETTAG permit 20 !

router bgp 65100
 neighbor 10.0.0.1 route-map SETTAG in

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 24mediummultiple choice

Consider the following configuration on R5:

!--- R5 configuration

ip prefix-list PL-2 seq 5 permit 10.0.0.0/8 ge 16 le 24

! route-map RMAP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PL-2 set community 100:100 !

router bgp 65200
 neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map RMAP out

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 25mediummultiple choice

Examine the following configuration on R6:

!--- R6 configuration route-map FILTER deny 10 match tag 50 ! route-map FILTER permit 20 !

router eigrp 200

distribute-list route-map FILTER in !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 26easymultiple choice

What is the default behavior of a route-map when a route does not match any match clause in any sequence?

Question 27mediummultiple choice

In BGP, what is the effect of using a route-map with a set community command but without the additive keyword?

Question 28mediummultiple choice

Which of the following is true regarding the use of prefix-lists versus access-lists for route filtering?

Question 29mediummulti select

Which TWO commands can be used to verify the effect of a route-map applied to a BGP neighbor? (Choose TWO.)

Question 30mediummulti select

Which TWO statements about route-maps used for route filtering are true? (Choose TWO.)

Question 31hardmulti select

Full Practice Test →All Objectives

Which TWO configuration steps are required to filter routes using a prefix-list in a route-map applied to a BGP neighbor? (Choose TWO.)

More Route Maps and Route Filtering questions available in the full practice test.

Continue Practising →

All 300-410 Objectives

Objective 107.0

Route Maps and Route Filtering

300-410 Practice Questions

300-410 Route Maps and Route Filtering — Practice Questions

30 questions from this objective

Question 2mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route filtering issue. Router R1 is advertising a prefix 10.1.1.0/24 to its eBGP neighbor R2, but R2 is not receiving it. The engineer checks R1's BGP configuration and sees a route-map named FILTER-OUT applied outbound to the neighbor. The route-map references an ACL that permits 10.1.1.0/24, but the prefix is still not being sent. What is the most likely cause?

Question 3hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a redistribution issue between OSPF and EIGRP. Router R3 is redistributing OSPF routes into EIGRP, but some OSPF external routes are not appearing in the EIGRP topology table. The engineer checks the redistribute command under EIGRP and sees a route-map named RM-OSPF that uses a prefix-list to match specific prefixes. The missing routes are permitted by the prefix-list. What is the most likely cause?

Question 4mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a PBR (Policy-Based Routing) issue on router R5. The engineer configured a route-map to set the next-hop for traffic from a specific source subnet. The route-map is applied to the incoming interface, but traffic from the source subnet is still being forwarded using the regular routing table. The engineer verifies that the ACL matches the traffic correctly. What is the most likely cause?

Question 5hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route filtering problem with prefix-lists. Router R6 is using a prefix-list to filter routes from a BGP neighbor. The prefix-list is configured to permit only 192.168.0.0/16 and 192.168.1.0/24, but routes with prefix 192.168.2.0/24 are also being accepted. The engineer checks the prefix-list configuration and sees only two permit statements. What is the most likely cause?

Question 6hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a redistribution loop between OSPF and EIGRP. Router R7 is redistributing EIGRP routes into OSPF, and also redistributing OSPF routes into EIGRP. The engineer notices that some OSPF routes are appearing in the EIGRP topology table with a higher metric than expected, causing suboptimal routing. What is the most likely cause?

Question 7mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route-map that is supposed to set a community value on routes from a specific neighbor. The engineer configures a route-map with 'set community 100:100' and applies it inbound to the neighbor. After the configuration, the engineer checks the BGP table on the local router and sees that the routes do not have the community set. What is the most likely cause?

Question 8mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route filtering issue using distribute-lists under OSPF. Router R8 has a distribute-list out applied to the OSPF process to filter routes being advertised to a specific neighbor. The distribute-list references an ACL that denies a specific prefix, but the prefix is still being advertised to the neighbor. What is the most likely cause?

Question 9hardmultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a PBR route-map that is supposed to set the next-hop for traffic from a specific source to a different next-hop. The route-map is applied to the incoming interface, and the ACL matches the traffic. However, the engineer notices that the traffic is still being forwarded using the routing table. The engineer checks the route-map and sees that the 'set ip next-hop' command points to an IP address that is not reachable. What is the most likely result?

Question 10mediummultiple choice

A network engineer is troubleshooting a BGP route-map that is supposed to prepend AS-path to routes from a specific neighbor. The engineer configures a route-map with 'set as-path prepend 65001' and applies it outbound to the neighbor. After the configuration, the engineer checks the BGP table on the neighbor and sees that the AS-path does not include the prepended AS. What is the most likely cause?

Question 11mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show route-map

route-map FILTER_OSPF, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list OSPF_ROUTES

Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map FILTER_OSPF, deny, sequence 20 Match clauses: Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Based on this output, which statement is correct?

Question 12hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.1.2 advertised-routes

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.10.10.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i *> 10.20.20.0/24 192.168.1.2 0 0 65001 i

Total number of prefixes 2

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 13mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip policy
Interface   Route-map

FastEthernet0/0 PBR_MAP

R1# show route-map PBR_MAP

route-map PBR_MAP, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list MATCH_HTTP

Set clauses:

ip next-hop 10.10.10.2

Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Based on this output, what is the most likely problem?

Question 14hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip eigrp topology 10.10.10.0/24

IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 10.10.10.0/24 State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 1 Successor(s), FD is 131072 Routing Descriptor Blocks:

10.1.1.2 (FastEthernet0/0), from 10.1.1.2, Send flag is 0x0

R1# show ip route 10.10.10.0

Routing entry for 10.10.10.0/24 Known via "eigrp 100", distance 90, metric 131072, type internal Last update from 10.1.1.2 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:12 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:

* 10.1.1.2, from 10.1.1.2, 00:00:12 ago, via FastEthernet0/0

Route metric is 131072, traffic share count is 1

R1# show ip eigrp interfaces
Interface         Peers    Xmit Queue   Mean   Pacing Time   Multicast    Pending

Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer Routes Fa0/0 1 0/0 10 0/10 50 0 Fa0/1 0 0/0 0 0/10 50 0

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 15mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip ospf database

OSPF Router with ID (10.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)

Router Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum Link count

10.1.1.1        10.1.1.1        100         0x80000001 0x00A0B0 1
10.2.2.2        10.2.2.2        200         0x80000003 0x00C0D0 2

Net Link States (Area 0)

Link ID ADV Router Age Seq# Checksum

10.1.1.2        10.1.1.2        150         0x80000001 0x00E0F0

R1# show ip route ospf
     10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
O       10.2.2.0/24 [110/20] via 10.1.1.2, 00:10:00, FastEthernet0/0

Based on this output, what is a likely issue?

Question 16hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show bgp ipv4 unicast 10.10.10.0/24

BGP routing table entry for 10.10.10.0/24, version 5 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local

10.1.1.2 from 10.1.1.2 (10.2.2.2)

Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0 (received-only)

Based on this output, what does the "(received-only)" flag indicate?

Question 17mediummultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 192.168.1.2

Neighbor sessions:

1 active, is multisession capable

Neighbor capabilities:

Based on this output, what is the effect of the prefix lists?

Question 18hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip route vrf CUSTOMER_A

Gateway of last resort is not set

10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
B       10.10.10.0/24 [200/0] via 192.168.1.2, 00:10:00
B       10.20.20.0/24 [200/0] via 192.168.1.2, 00:10:00

R1# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf CUSTOMER_A

Based on this output, what is the likely issue?

Question 19hardmultiple choice

A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:

R1# show ip bgp neighbors 10.1.1.2 advertised-routes

Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.10.10.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 10.20.20.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i

R1# show route-map

route-map BLOCK_RFC1918, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:

ip address prefix-list RFC1918

Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map BLOCK_RFC1918, deny, sequence 20 Match clauses: Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

R1# show ip prefix-list RFC1918
ip prefix-list RFC1918: 3 entries

seq 5 deny 10.0.0.0/8 le 32 seq

10 deny 172.16.0.0/12 le 32

seq

15 deny 192.168.0.0/16 le 32

seq

20 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

Based on this output, what is the most likely issue?

Question 20mediummultiple choice

Examine the following partial configuration on R1:

!--- R1 configuration route-map RMAP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PL-1 set metric 100 ! route-map RMAP permit 20 set metric 200 !

router eigrp 100
 network 10.0.0.0

redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 route-map RMAP !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 21mediummultiple choice

Consider the following configuration on router R2:

!--- R2 configuration

ip prefix-list FILTER seq 5 deny 10.1.0.0/16 le 24
ip prefix-list FILTER seq 
10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32

! route-map BGP-IN permit 10 match ip address prefix-list FILTER !

router bgp 65000
 neighbor 192.168.1.1 route-map BGP-IN in

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 22mediummultiple choice

Examine the following configuration on R3:

!--- R3 configuration

access-list 10 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 
10 deny   any

! route-map OSPF-REDIST permit 10 match ip address 10 set metric-type type-1 !

router ospf 1

redistribute eigrp 100 subnets route-map OSPF-REDIST !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 23mediummultiple choice

Router R4 has the following configuration:

!--- R4 configuration route-map SETTAG permit 10 match tag 100 set tag 200 ! route-map SETTAG permit 20 !

router bgp 65100
 neighbor 10.0.0.1 route-map SETTAG in

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 24mediummultiple choice

Consider the following configuration on R5:

!--- R5 configuration

ip prefix-list PL-2 seq 5 permit 10.0.0.0/8 ge 16 le 24

! route-map RMAP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list PL-2 set community 100:100 !

router bgp 65200
 neighbor 192.168.1.2 route-map RMAP out

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 25mediummultiple choice

Examine the following configuration on R6:

!--- R6 configuration route-map FILTER deny 10 match tag 50 ! route-map FILTER permit 20 !

router eigrp 200

distribute-list route-map FILTER in !

What is the effect of this configuration?

Question 26easymultiple choice

What is the default behavior of a route-map when a route does not match any match clause in any sequence?

Question 27mediummultiple choice

In BGP, what is the effect of using a route-map with a set community command but without the additive keyword?

Question 28mediummultiple choice

Which of the following is true regarding the use of prefix-lists versus access-lists for route filtering?

Question 29mediummulti select

Which TWO commands can be used to verify the effect of a route-map applied to a BGP neighbor? (Choose TWO.)

Question 30mediummulti select

Which TWO statements about route-maps used for route filtering are true? (Choose TWO.)

Question 31hardmulti select