Question 2mediummultiple choice
Review the full OSPF breakdown →300-410 Practice Questions
30 questions from this objective
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip eigrp topology 10.1.1.0/24
IP-EIGRP (AS 100): Topology entry for 10.1.1.0/24 State: Passive, Originating reply status: 0 Routing Descriptor Blocks:
0.0.0.0 (Null0), from 0.0.0.0, Send flag: 0x0
Composite metric is (2560000000/0), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit Total delay is 100 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 0
10.2.2.2 (GigabitEthernet0/1), from 10.2.2.2, Send flag: 0x0
Composite metric is (2688000000/2560000000), Route is Internal Vector metric: Minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit Total delay is 200 microseconds Reliability is 255/255 Load is 1/255 Minimum MTU is 1500 Hop count is 1
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip ospf database external 10.1.1.0
OSPF Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 1)
Type-5 AS External Link States (Area 0)
LS age: 120 Options: (No TOS-capability, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 10.1.1.0 (External Network Number) Advertising Router: 2.2.2.2 LS Seq Number: 80000001 Checksum: 0x1234 Length: 36 Network Mask: /24 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 20 Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 External Route Tag: 100
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip bgp 10.1.1.0/24
BGP routing table entry for 10.1.1.0/24, version 10 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local
10.2.2.2 from 10.2.2.2 (2.2.2.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0 Community: 100:200
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show route-map REDISTRIBUTE
route-map REDISTRIBUTE, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:
ip address prefix-list EIGRP_ROUTES
Set clauses: metric 100 metric-type type-1 tag 200 Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
route-map REDISTRIBUTE, deny, sequence 20 Match clauses:
ip address prefix-list DENY_ALL
Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip route 10.1.1.0
Routing entry for 10.1.1.0/24 Known via "eigrp 100", distance 170, metric 2560000 Redistributing via eigrp 100 Advertised by eigrp 100 (self originated) Last update from 10.2.2.2 on GigabitEthernet0/1, 00:00:10 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.2.2.2, from 10.2.2.2, 00:00:10 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/1
Route metric is 2560000, traffic share count is 1 Total delay is 100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 Loading 1/255, Hops 1
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip ospf interface GigabitEthernet0/1
GigabitEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 10.1.1.1/24, Area 0 Process ID 1, Router ID 1.1.1.1, Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1 Designated Router (ID) 1.1.1.1, Interface address 10.1.1.1 Backup Designated router (ID) 2.2.2.2, Interface address 10.1.1.2 Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 oob-resync timeout 40 Hello due in 00:00:03 Supports Link-local Signaling (LLS) Cisco NSF helper support enabled IETF NSF helper support enabled Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 25 Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 4 msec
Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1
Adjacent with neighbor 2.2.2.2 (Backup Designated Router) Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip bgp neighbors 10.2.2.2 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 10, local router ID is 1.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.1.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 10.2.2.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 2
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip eigrp interfaces detail GigabitEthernet0/1
IP-EIGRP interfaces for process 100
Xmit Queue Mean Pacing Time Multicast Pending
Interface Peers Un/Reliable SRTT Un/Reliable Flow Timer Routes
Gi0/1 1 0/0 10 0/10 50 0 Hello interval is 5 sec Next xmit serial <none> Un/reliable mcasts: 0/0 Un/reliable ucasts: 0/0 Mcast exceptions: 0 CR packets: 0 ACKs suppressed: 0 Retransmissions: 0 Out of sequence: 0 Authentication mode: none Redistribution: redistributed
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip route 192.168.1.0
Routing entry for 192.168.1.0/24 Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward metric 100 Redistributing via ospf 1 Last update from 10.1.1.2 on GigabitEthernet0/1, 00:00:05 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.1.1.2, from 10.1.1.2, 00:00:05 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/1
Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
Based on this output, what is the problem?
Consider the following partial configuration on Router R1:
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 subnets
Which statement about this configuration is true?
Given the following configuration on Router R2:
router eigrp 200
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 default-metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
What is the effect of having both the 'metric' keyword in the redistribute command and the 'default-metric' command?
Examine this partial configuration on Router R3:
router ospf 1
redistribute rip subnets metric-type 1 metric 50
What is the effect of the 'metric-type 1' keyword?
Consider the following configuration on Router R4:
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 20 metric-type 1 subnets
What is a potential issue with this configuration?
Given this configuration on Router R5:
route-map OSPF-to-EIGRP permit 10 match ip address prefix-list EIGRP-ONLY set metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 !
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1 route-map OSPF-to-EIGRP
What is the purpose of the route-map in this configuration?
Examine this configuration on Router R6:
router ospf 1
redistribute eigrp 100 subnets default-information originate always
What is a likely problem with this configuration?
More Route Redistribution questions available in the full practice test.
Continue Practising →