Question 2mediummultiple choice
Read the full VRF explanation →300-410 Practice Questions
30 questions from this objective
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip vrf interfaces Interface VRF IP Address Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0 BLUE 10.1.1.1 up GigabitEthernet0/1 BLUE 10.1.2.1 up GigabitEthernet0/2 RED 192.168.1.1 up Loopback0 BLUE 10.0.0.1 up Loopback1 RED 192.168.0.1 up
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip route vrf BLUE
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP a - application route + - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is not set
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 2 masks C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0 C 10.1.2.0/24 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/1 O 10.2.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.1.1.2, 00:00:15, GigabitEthernet0/0
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf RED summary
BGP router identifier 192.168.0.1, local AS number 65001 BGP table version is 5, main routing table version 5 4 network entries using 576 bytes of memory 4 path entries using 320 bytes of memory 2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 320 bytes of memory 0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory 0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory BGP using 1216 total bytes of memory BGP activity 4/0 prefixes, 4/0 paths, scan interval 60 secs
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.1.1.2 4 65001 23 25 5 0 0 00:12:34 2 10.1.2.2 4 65002 18 20 5 0 0 00:10:15 1
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip eigrp vrf RED neighbors
EIGRP-IPv4 Neighbors for AS(100) VRF RED H Address Interface Hold Uptime SRTT RTO Q Seq (sec) (ms) Cnt Num 0 192.168.1.2 Gi0/2 13 00:15:30 12 200 0 45 1 192.168.2.2 Gi0/3 12 00:14:20 15 200 0 32
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip ospf neighbor vrf BLUE Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface 10.0.0.2 1 FULL/DR 00:00:32 10.1.1.2 GigabitEthernet0/0 10.0.0.3 1 2WAY/DROTHER 00:00:35 10.1.2.2 GigabitEthernet0/1
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show route-map VRF_RED_MAP
route-map VRF_RED_MAP, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses:
ip address prefix-list RED_PREFIXES
Set clauses: tag 100 Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip vrf detail RED
VRF RED (VRF Id = 1); default RD <not set>
Interfaces:
GigabitEthernet0/2 Loopback1 Address family IPV4 (Table ID = 1):
No Export VPN route-target communities
No Import VPN route-target communities
No import route-map
No export route-mapVRF label distribution protocol: not configured Address family IPV6 (Table ID = 0x1E000001):
No Export VPN route-target communities
No Import VPN route-target communities
No import route-map
No export route-mapVRF label distribution protocol: not configured
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf RED neighbors 10.1.1.2 advertised-routes
BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 192.168.0.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, t secondary path, L long-lived-stale, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 192.168.1.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i *> 192.168.2.0/24 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
Total number of prefixes 2
Based on this output, what is the problem?
A network engineer runs the following command on Router R1:
R1# show ip route vrf RED 192.168.1.0
Routing entry for 192.168.1.0/24 Known via "connected", distance 0, metric 0 (connected, via interface) Routing Descriptor Blocks: * directly connected, via GigabitEthernet0/2 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
Based on this output, which statement is correct?
Given the following partial configuration on router R1: ```
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_A ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
``` What is the effect of this configuration?
Consider this partial configuration: ```
ip vrf CUSTOMER_B
rd 65000:1 route-target export 65000:1 route-target import 65000:1 ``` What statement is true about this VRF configuration?
Examine the following configuration: ```
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_C ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no shutdown
``` What is missing from this configuration to ensure that routes from VRF CUSTOMER_C are properly isolated?
Given this configuration on router R2: ```
ip vrf CUSTOMER_D
rd 100:1 !
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_D ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
!
router ospf 1 vrf CUSTOMER_D network 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
``` What will happen when this configuration is applied?
Consider the following configuration: ```
ip vrf CUSTOMER_E
rd 200:1 route-target export 200:1 route-target import 200:1 !
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_E ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_E ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
``` What is the effect of the route-target commands in this VRF-Lite scenario?
Examine this partial configuration: ```
interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_F ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1 ip vrf forwarding CUSTOMER_G ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
``` What is required to enable communication between VRF CUSTOMER_F and VRF CUSTOMER_G?
More VRF-Lite questions available in the full practice test.
Continue Practising →