Question 682 of 892
Process — Managing Technical AspectseasyMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of process — managing technical aspects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Two senior developers have a conflict over which technical approach to use for a module. The disagreement is delaying the sprint. What should the project manager do FIRST?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "first"

    Why it matters: Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Facilitate a meeting with the developers to discuss the pros and cons of each approach and help them reach a consensus

Option B is correct because the project manager's first responsibility in a technical conflict is to facilitate collaboration and consensus-building between the developers. This aligns with the PMP's emphasis on servant leadership and conflict resolution techniques like 'collaborating' or 'problem-solving' within the team, especially when the disagreement directly impacts sprint delivery. By guiding a structured discussion of pros and cons, the PM preserves team autonomy and leverages the developers' expertise to find the best technical solution.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Escalate the issue to the project sponsor for a decision

    Why it's wrong here

    Too early to escalate; the team can resolve it.

  • Facilitate a meeting with the developers to discuss the pros and cons of each approach and help them reach a consensus

    Why this is correct

    Facilitation empowers the team to resolve their own conflict.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "first" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Assign the module to a different developer to avoid the conflict

    Why it's wrong here

    Avoidance does not resolve the underlying issue.

  • Decide on the approach yourself based on your experience

    Why it's wrong here

    Imposing a decision may reduce team ownership.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often choose Option D (deciding yourself) because they confuse the project manager's authority with technical leadership, forgetting that the PM's role is to facilitate, not dictate, technical solutions.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In agile environments, technical disagreements often involve trade-offs like coupling vs. cohesion, or eventual consistency vs. strong consistency. Facilitating a meeting allows the team to evaluate both approaches against non-functional requirements (e.g., throughput, fault tolerance) using techniques like decision matrices or ADRs (Architecture Decision Records). This process also surfaces hidden assumptions—for example, one developer might prioritize low latency while the other prioritizes data integrity—which can be resolved through empirical data or spike solutions.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

Process — Managing Technical Aspects — This question tests Process — Managing Technical Aspects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Facilitate a meeting with the developers to discuss the pros and cons of each approach and help them reach a consensus — Option B is correct because the project manager's first responsibility in a technical conflict is to facilitate collaboration and consensus-building between the developers. This aligns with the PMP's emphasis on servant leadership and conflict resolution techniques like 'collaborating' or 'problem-solving' within the team, especially when the disagreement directly impacts sprint delivery. By guiding a structured discussion of pros and cons, the PM preserves team autonomy and leverages the developers' expertise to find the best technical solution.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "first". Order matters here. You are being tested on which action comes before the others — not which action is generally useful.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More PMP practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.