CAPM Business Analysis Frameworks Practice Question
You are a business analyst assigned to a project that aims to streamline the inventory management process for a mid-sized retail company. The project sponsor has verbally described the need for a new system but has not provided any formal documentation. During the kickoff meeting, the project manager asks you to start eliciting requirements immediately. However, you notice that there is no business case or project charter. The sponsor is not available to provide additional information until next week. The project manager is eager to show progress to stakeholders and wants to begin gathering requirements from users today. What should you do first?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Develop a business case based on the initial discussion with the sponsor and present it for approval before proceeding with requirements elicitation.
Without a business case, there is no justification or scope for the project. The business analyst should develop a business case based on the initial discussion to ensure the project aligns with organizational goals. Starting requirements without a business case risks scope creep and wasted effort. Asking the sponsor again may delay, but the sponsor is unavailable. Starting requirements immediately is premature. Escalating to the project manager is not productive as they already want to start.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Begin requirements elicitation with users as requested, and document assumptions about the business case for later validation.
Why it's wrong here
Proceeding without a business case risks misalignment and scope creep.
- ✗
Ask the project manager to obtain the business case from the sponsor before starting any requirements work.
Why it's wrong here
The sponsor is unavailable, so this would cause delay without progress.
- ✓
Develop a business case based on the initial discussion with the sponsor and present it for approval before proceeding with requirements elicitation.
Why this is correct
A business case provides justification and scope, preventing rework.
- ✗
Escalate the issue to the steering committee for a decision on whether to proceed without a business case.
Why it's wrong here
Escalation may be premature; developing a draft business case is more proactive.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CAPM question from scratch — 487 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on CAPM
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A business analyst is evaluating whether a proposed project aligns with the organization’s strategic goals. Which framework is best suited for this purpose?
medium- A.SWOT Analysis
- B.Requirements Traceability Matrix
- ✓ C.Business Case
- D.Stakeholder Register
Why C: A business case justifies the project and includes strategic alignment. SWOT analysis assesses strengths/weaknesses/opportunities/threats, Requirements Traceability Matrix tracks requirements, and Stakeholder Register lists stakeholders.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.