Courseiva
mediumMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

300-410 Practice Question: Which TWO statements are true regarding the use…

Which TWO statements are true regarding the use of VRF-Lite in a Cisco Enterprise network? (Choose TWO.)

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

VRF-Lite enables multiple virtual routing tables on a single router, providing traffic separation without MPLS.

VRF-Lite allows multiple routing tables on a single router, enabling traffic separation without MPLS. It relies on static routes or dynamic routing protocols like OSPF, EIGRP, or BGP within each VRF. The incorrect options: MPLS is not required for VRF-Lite; VRF-Lite does not support MPLS VPNv4 route exchange (that requires MPLS); and VRF-Lite does not inherently provide encryption.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • VRF-Lite enables multiple virtual routing tables on a single router, providing traffic separation without MPLS.

    Why this is correct

    VRF-Lite creates separate routing tables per VRF, isolating traffic at Layer 3 without needing MPLS.

  • VRF-Lite supports dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF and EIGRP within each VRF.

    Why this is correct

    Dynamic routing can be configured per VRF, allowing separate routing domains to exchange routes.

  • VRF-Lite requires MPLS to exchange VPNv4 routes between routers.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite does not use MPLS; VPNv4 route exchange requires MPLS and MP-BGP.

  • VRF-Lite can automatically encrypt traffic between VRFs using IPsec.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite does not provide encryption; IPsec must be configured separately if needed.

  • VRF-Lite can only be used with static routing.

    Why it's wrong here

    VRF-Lite supports both static and dynamic routing protocols, not just static.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

This 300-410 question is part of Courseiva's 1,966-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.