New Regulatory Requirement: First Step in Change Control
Your project is in the execution phase, and a new regulatory requirement has been discovered that will affect the project scope. The change is mandatory and must be implemented within two weeks. What should you do FIRST?
Quick Answer
The answer is to submit a change request for the new requirement and assess its impact. This is correct because the PMBOK Guide’s integrated change control process mandates that even a mandatory regulatory requirement must be formally documented and evaluated for effects on scope, schedule, cost, and quality before any action is taken. On the PMP exam, this scenario tests your understanding that a new regulatory requirement change control process always begins with a change request, not with direct implementation or plan updates—a common trap where test-takers assume “mandatory” means skipping governance. The key insight is that compliance does not override process; you must assess impact first to determine how the requirement integrates with existing baselines. Remember the mnemonic “CR before IR” (Change Request before Implementation or Revision) to avoid falling for distractors that suggest updating the plan or stopping work immediately.
⚠ Common exam trap
Many exam-takers assume mandatory changes can bypass the formal change control process, leading them to choose direct plan updates or sponsor approval, but the PMP exam always requires a change request as the first step regardless of urgency.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Submit a change request for the new requirement and assess its impact
When a mandatory regulatory requirement is discovered during execution, the first step is to submit a change request and assess its impact. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's integrated change control process, which requires that all changes—even mandatory ones—be formally documented and evaluated for their effect on scope, schedule, cost, and quality before any action is taken. Directly updating the plan or stopping work bypasses this critical governance step.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Directly update the project management plan to reflect the new requirement
Why it's wrong here
Updating the plan directly bypasses the integrated change control process, so the change is never formally assessed or approved. It tempts because the requirement is mandatory, but direct plan edits suit only pre-baseline planning, not execution-phase scope changes.
- ✓
Submit a change request for the new requirement and assess its impact
Why this is correct
Because the requirement is mandatory and affects scope, the change must pass through integrated change control before any work begins. Submitting a change request and assessing impact on schedule, cost and resources satisfies the stem's constraint, enabling the CCB to authorise the two-week implementation.
- ✗
Stop all project work until the change is resolved
Why it's wrong here
Halting all work delays deliverables unnecessarily; the change must still pass through Perform Integrated Change Control before any implementation. It tempts as a risk-avoidance reaction, but stopping work is correct only when continuing would cause irreversible harm or safety violations.
- ✗
Inform the sponsor and ask for immediate approval
Why it's wrong here
Requesting sponsor approval skips submitting a change request and the Perform Integrated Change Control review, so the impact is never analysed. It tempts because regulatory changes are mandatory, but sponsor approval is correct only after the change request has been assessed.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
This PMP question is part of Courseiva's 820-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more way this is tested on PMP
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. A new regulatory requirement has been discovered mid-project. This requirement will affect the project scope and schedule. Which THREE actions should you take?
hard- A.Ignore the requirement until the next project phase
- ✓ B.Assess the impact of the new requirement on scope, schedule, and cost
- ✓ C.Communicate the potential impact to key stakeholders
- D.Implement the requirement immediately to ensure compliance
- ✓ E.Submit a change request to formally propose the necessary modifications
Why B: A new regulatory requirement discovered mid-project must be assessed for its impact on the triple constraint (scope, schedule, cost) before any action is taken. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's Perform Integrated Change Control process, where the project manager evaluates the effect of a change on all project baselines. Without this assessment, you cannot determine the feasibility or the necessary adjustments to the project plan.
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.