Courseiva

CAPM Agile Frameworks and Methodologies Practice Question

During a sprint review, the team demonstrates a new feature to stakeholders. One stakeholder says, 'This isn't what we wanted. We need a completely different approach.' The product owner is upset because the feature took two weeks to build. The team is frustrated because they followed the product owner's specifications exactly. The Scrum Master observes that the product owner did not involve stakeholders during the sprint and based the user stories on assumptions. The product owner wants to add the rework to the next sprint. However, the team's capacity is already full. The Scrum Master needs to help the team and product owner recover. What should the Scrum Master do first?

⚠ Common exam trap

CAPM/Scrum questions often bait candidates into 'fixing' the symptom (adding rework, overtime, or removing people) instead of addressing the root cause through coaching and stakeholder collaboration, which is the Scrum Master's proper first action.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Coach the product owner to collaborate with stakeholders during the sprint to validate assumptions early

The Scrum Master should first coach the product owner to collaborate with stakeholders throughout the sprint so assumptions are validated early, preventing late-surfacing misalignment. This addresses the root cause — the product owner built user stories on unvalidated assumptions without stakeholder involvement — rather than treating the symptom of rework. Coaching the product owner is a core Scrum Master responsibility and a servant-leadership action.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Remove the product owner from the project to prevent future miscommunication

    Why it's wrong here

    Removing the product owner violates the Scrum framework’s principle that the product owner is a single accountable role for maximising value; the correct first step is to facilitate a conversation to align stakeholder expectations with backlog priorities, not to eliminate the role. This option is tempting because it offers a swift, punitive fix for repeated miscommunication, and it would be correct only if the product owner had demonstrated persistent, irremediable negligence that the Scrum Master had already attempted to resolve through coaching and process improvement.

  • ✗

    Blame the team for not clarifying requirements during the sprint

    Why it's wrong here

    Blaming the team misdirects accountability: the product owner authored the user stories from assumptions without stakeholder involvement, so the team built exactly what was specified. Blame is tempting when output mismatches expectations, but the Scrum Master must first facilitate stakeholder collaboration and backlog refinement, not assign fault.

  • ✓

    Coach the product owner to collaborate with stakeholders during the sprint to validate assumptions early

    Why this is correct

    The root cause is that the product owner built user stories on assumptions without stakeholder validation. Coaching collaboration during the sprint lets assumptions be tested early, preventing costly rework and aligning delivered features with actual stakeholder needs before capacity is consumed.

  • ✗

    Add the rework to the next sprint and ask the team to work overtime

    Why it's wrong here

    Mandating overtime to absorb rework treats the symptom, not the cause, and violates Scrum's sustainable pace while hiding the planning failure. Overtime is tempting when a sprint is over capacity, but the Scrum Master should first address the stakeholder-alignment gap that produced the wrong feature.

About these practice questions

One of 451 original CAPM practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official PMI exam blueprint

This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.