CAPM Business Analysis Frameworks Practice Question
A BA is prioritizing a large number of requirements. Which TWO techniques are best suited for this scenario?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Kano model
Options C and D are correct. The Kano model and MoSCoW analysis are both prioritization techniques used to rank requirements based on value, urgency, and stakeholder satisfaction. Option A (Benchmarking) is a comparison technique, not a prioritization method. Option B (Focus group) is an elicitation technique for gathering requirements. Option E (Observation) is also an elicitation technique, not suited for prioritization.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Benchmarking
Why it's wrong here
Comparison against industry standards.
- ✗
Focus group
Why it's wrong here
Elicitation technique.
- ✓
Kano model
Why this is correct
Prioritization based on customer satisfaction.
- ✓
MoSCoW analysis
Why this is correct
Prioritization technique categorizing by importance.
- ✗
Observation
Why it's wrong here
Elicitation technique.
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every CAPM question from scratch — 487 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This CAPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CAPM exam.