An engineer is deploying MPLS in the core and wants to ensure that all core routers use the same label for a specific prefix, regardless of which router originated it. Which MPLS label allocation mode should be used?
Per-prefix allocates one label per prefix, ensuring same label across all routers.
Why this answer
Per-prefix label mode (option C) is correct because it assigns a single label for a specific prefix across all core routers, regardless of which router originated the route. This ensures label consistency, which is critical for proper MPLS forwarding and troubleshooting. In contrast, per-next-hop or per-interface modes would create different labels for the same prefix based on the next hop or interface, breaking the requirement for uniform label allocation.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the distinction between per-prefix and per-next-hop label modes, and the trap here is that candidates confuse per-next-hop (which creates multiple labels for the same prefix) with per-prefix, thinking that per-next-hop ensures consistency when it actually does the opposite.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option A is wrong because per-interface label mode assigns a unique label per interface for each FEC, which would cause the same prefix to have different labels on different interfaces, not a single label across all routers. Option B is wrong because per-next-hop label mode allocates a label per next hop for a given prefix, leading to multiple labels for the same prefix if multiple next hops exist, violating the requirement for a single label. Option D is wrong because per-VRF label mode is used in MPLS VPNs to assign a label per VRF, not per prefix, and would not ensure a single label for a specific prefix across the core.