PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

• ✓

  Re-estimate the estimate at completion (EAC) based on current performance

  Why this is correct

  When project performance deviates, re-estimating the Estimate at Completion (EAC) is a crucial step in the Control Costs process. This involves recalculating the projected total cost of the project based on actual costs incurred to date and the current performance trends. Updating the EAC provides stakeholders with a realistic forecast of the project's final cost, enabling informed decision-making and proactive financial management.

• ✓

  Analyze the root causes of the schedule and cost variances

  Why this is correct

  Before implementing any changes, it is imperative to analyze the root causes of significant schedule and cost variances identified through earned value analysis. This involves investigating the underlying factors contributing to the deviations, rather than just addressing symptoms. Understanding the true causes ensures that any subsequent corrective actions are effective and prevent recurrence, aligning with the Control Schedule and Control Costs processes.

• ✗

  Immediately crash the critical path to recover schedule

  Why it's wrong here

  Crashing the critical path is a schedule compression technique that involves adding resources to critical path activities to shorten their duration, often at an increased cost. However, immediately crashing without prior root cause analysis or evaluating other options is premature and risky. Such an action could lead to inefficient resource allocation, unnecessary cost increases, or even new problems if the underlying issues are not addressed first.

• ✓

  Identify and implement corrective actions to improve cost and schedule efficiency

  Why this is correct

  Following a thorough analysis of variances and their root causes, identifying and implementing appropriate corrective actions is essential to bring project performance back in line with the plan. These actions are designed to improve future cost and schedule efficiency, addressing the identified issues directly. This proactive management step ensures the project remains on track to meet its objectives and stakeholder expectations.

• ✗

  Escalate the performance issues to the sponsor with a request for additional budget

  Why it's wrong here

  Escalating performance issues to the sponsor with an immediate request for additional budget is generally premature and demonstrates a lack of proactive project management. A project manager's responsibility includes first analyzing the situation, identifying root causes, and exploring potential solutions within their authority. Escalation should occur only after internal efforts have been exhausted or when the required solution exceeds the PM's authority or the project's current scope/budget.

Go deeper

Related to this question