Courseiva
Process — Managing Technical AspectsmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Best Schedule Compression Technique When Budget Is Available

Your project is behind schedule, and you need to compress the schedule. The critical path has been identified. What is the BEST schedule compression technique to use if you have additional budget available?

Quick Answer

The answer is crashing. Crashing is the best schedule compression technique when additional budget is available because it focuses on adding resources—such as overtime, extra staff, or specialized equipment—directly to critical path activities to reduce overall project duration. Unlike fast tracking, which runs tasks in parallel and risks rework, crashing trades cost for time and is explicitly designed for scenarios where budget constraints are not the primary limitation. On the PMP exam, this question tests your ability to distinguish between schedule compression methods under specific constraints; a common trap is confusing crashing with fast tracking or assuming resource leveling can shorten the schedule. Remember the memory tip: “Crash the critical path with cash”—if you have budget, you crash.

⚠ Common exam trap

It's easy for candidates to confuse fast tracking with crashing, thinking both compress the schedule, but fast tracking increases risk while crashing increases cost—and the question explicitly provides additional budget, making crashing the clear choice.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Crashing

Crashing is the correct technique because it involves adding resources (e.g., overtime, additional staff, or expedited shipping) to critical path activities to compress the schedule, and the question explicitly states additional budget is available. Unlike fast tracking, crashing does not increase risk but does increase cost, making it the best choice when budget is not a constraint.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Fast tracking

    Why it's wrong here

    Fast tracking performs activities in parallel, which can increase risk without additional cost, but the question specifies having additional budget.

  • Crashing

    Why this is correct

    Crashing adds resources to critical path activities to shorten duration, typically with increased cost.

  • Resource smoothing

    Why it's wrong here

    Resource smoothing adjusts activities without changing critical path length.

  • Resource leveling

    Why it's wrong here

    Resource leveling addresses resource constraints but may increase schedule.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more way this is tested on PMP

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Your project is running behind schedule. You need to compress the schedule without significantly increasing cost. Which TWO techniques should you consider?

medium
  • A.Add resources from non-critical path activities to critical path tasks
  • B.Fast-track activities by performing them in parallel
  • C.Eliminate non-essential deliverables without approval
  • D.Reduce quality standards to save time
  • E.Reduce project scope without change control

Why A: Adding resources from non-critical path activities to critical path tasks is a form of resource leveling or resource optimization that can compress the schedule without significant cost increase, as it reallocates existing resources rather than hiring new ones. Option B is correct because fast-tracking involves performing activities in parallel that were originally planned sequentially, which can reduce the project duration without adding costs, though it may increase risk.

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.