PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question
Your agile team has been self-organizing and performing well, but during the last two retrospectives, the team has raised concerns about the product owner not providing clear acceptance criteria for user stories. As the project manager, what is the most effective way to address this?
⚠ Common exam trap
It's easy for candidates to confuse 'taking action' with 'doing the work yourself' (Option C) or 'escalating' (Option B), failing to recognize that the PM's role is to coach and enable the PO, not to bypass or override their responsibilities.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Coach the product owner on writing effective acceptance criteria and encourage the team to raise concerns during backlog refinement
It directly addresses the root cause—unclear acceptance criteria—by coaching the Product Owner (PO) on how to write them effectively. This aligns with the agile principle of continuous improvement and the servant-leader role of the project manager, who facilitates collaboration between the PO and the development team. Encouraging the team to raise concerns during backlog refinement ensures that issues are resolved proactively before the sprint begins, maintaining self-organization and team performance.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Coach the product owner on writing effective acceptance criteria and encourage the team to raise concerns during backlog refinement
Why this is correct
As an agile coach, the Project Manager's primary role is to facilitate and remove impediments, which includes improving team processes and capabilities. Coaching the Product Owner on crafting clear, testable acceptance criteria directly enhances the quality of user stories and reduces ambiguity for the development team. Simultaneously, empowering the self-organizing team to voice concerns during backlog refinement fosters proactive communication and shared understanding, addressing the root cause of potential issues before they impact sprint execution. This approach strengthens the team's autonomy and the Product Owner's effectiveness, aligning with agile principles.
- ✗
Escalate the issue to the project sponsor
Why it's wrong here
Escalating an internal team process issue, such as unclear acceptance criteria, directly to the project sponsor is premature and bypasses appropriate channels for resolution. The Project Manager, in an agile context, should first attempt to resolve impediments and improve team dynamics at the lowest possible level, typically by engaging directly with the Product Owner and the development team. Such an escalation would undermine the Product Owner's authority and the team's self-organizing principles, potentially creating unnecessary tension and demonstrating a lack of direct problem-solving initiative.
- ✗
Write the acceptance criteria yourself to ensure clarity
Why it's wrong here
Writing the acceptance criteria yourself directly usurps the Product Owner's accountability and responsibility for defining product backlog items and their associated conditions of satisfaction. This action undermines the Product Owner's critical role in representing stakeholder needs and ensuring product value, preventing them from developing essential skills. Furthermore, it disempowers the self-organizing team by removing their opportunity to collaborate directly with the Product Owner on understanding and refining requirements, thereby hindering shared ownership and clarity.
- ✗
Add a task to the sprint backlog for the team to clarify acceptance criteria with the product owner
Why it's wrong here
Adding a specific task to the sprint backlog for the team to clarify acceptance criteria with the Product Owner is an inefficient and reactive approach that treats a symptom rather than the root cause. Backlog refinement is the dedicated event for this collaboration, ensuring stories are "ready" for sprint planning, not for clarification during the sprint itself. This action would consume valuable sprint time, indicate a failure in prior refinement activities, and fail to address the systemic issue of the Product Owner's skill gap in writing effective criteria, thus not fostering long-term improvement.
Visual reference
Go deeper
Related to this question
About these practice questions
One of 800 original PMP practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.