PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question
Which THREE factors are most critical when selecting a conflict resolution technique for a project team? (Choose three.)
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often mistakenly include 'organizational hierarchy' (Option E) because they confuse reporting structure with authority to resolve conflicts, but the PMP exam focuses on the conflict's characteristics and interpersonal dynamics, not formal hierarchy.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties.
The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties directly influence which conflict resolution technique (e.g., collaborating, compromising, avoiding) will be effective. A technique that works for a collaborative team may fail with highly competitive individuals, so understanding interpersonal dynamics is critical for selecting an approach that de-escalates rather than intensifies the conflict.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The cost of implementing the resolution technique.
Why it's wrong here
Conflict resolution techniques primarily involve communication, negotiation, and mediation, which are generally low-cost activities focused on human interaction rather than significant financial outlay. While some external mediation might incur fees, the primary concern when selecting a technique is its effectiveness in resolving the underlying issue and preventing adverse project impacts. Prioritizing cost over efficacy could lead to unresolved conflicts, ultimately incurring far greater expenses through delays, rework, or damaged team morale.
- ✓
The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties.
Why this is correct
Understanding the individual personalities, communication styles, and the pre-existing relationship dynamics between the conflicting parties is paramount for effective conflict resolution. This insight enables the project manager to tailor the approach, for instance, by choosing a collaborative, problem-solving technique for parties with mutual respect, or a more directive, authoritative approach when relationships are strained and a quick decision is required. A technique that disregards these interpersonal factors is unlikely to achieve a sustainable resolution.
- ✓
The severity and complexity of the conflict.
Why this is correct
The nature of the conflict, ranging from a minor disagreement over task execution to a deep-seated interpersonal issue or a complex technical dispute, directly influences the intensity and formality of the required intervention. Simple, low-severity conflicts might be resolved through informal discussions or smoothing, whereas complex, high-severity conflicts involving multiple stakeholders or significant technical disagreements often necessitate formal mediation, structured negotiation, or even executive intervention to achieve a sustainable resolution. The chosen technique must match the conflict's gravity.
- ✓
The potential impact on project schedule and budget.
Why this is correct
Conflicts that threaten critical path activities, resource availability, or financial targets demand immediate and decisive resolution, making their potential project impact a crucial selection factor. The project manager must assess the ripple effects of an unresolved conflict on project timelines, costs, quality, and scope. This assessment prioritizes conflicts and influences the urgency and intensity of the chosen resolution strategy, favoring techniques that yield quick and effective outcomes for high-impact issues to mitigate project risks.
- ✗
The organizational hierarchy and reporting structure.
Why it's wrong here
While organizational hierarchy defines formal communication channels and authority, it is less critical in *selecting* a conflict resolution technique than the specific nature of the conflict or the parties involved. The primary goal is to effectively resolve the conflict, irrespective of who reports to whom. Although a project manager might leverage their hierarchical authority in a "forcing" technique, the structure itself does not dictate *which* technique is inherently best suited for addressing the specific dynamics and root causes of a particular conflict.
Go deeper
Related to this question
Learn chapter
Introduction to the PMP Exam and Project Management Basics
Key term
Conflict Resolution
Conflict resolution is the process of addressing and resolving disagreements between team members or stakeholders to maintain a productive and collaborative project environment.
Key term
Project Team Management
Project Team Management is the process of leading, coordinating, and supporting a group of people to complete project tasks and achieve project objectives.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every PMP question from scratch — 800 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.