Question 564 of 892
People — Leading ProjectshardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is the potential impact on project schedule and budget, the personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties, and the urgency of the conflict. These three factors are most critical when selecting a conflict resolution technique because they directly determine whether a collaborative, compromising, or avoiding approach will succeed without derailing project objectives. For instance, a high-urgency conflict demands a forcing technique to protect the schedule, while a deep personal rift between parties may require collaborating to preserve team cohesion, even if it takes more time. On the PMP exam, this tests your understanding of situational leadership within the Manage Team process, often appearing as a multi-select question where distractors include “the project manager’s preferred style” or “the organizational culture,” which are secondary. A common trap is choosing “severity of the conflict” alone—remember that severity is a symptom, not a factor. Memory tip: think “SUP”—Schedule, Understanding (personalities), and Priority (urgency).

PMP People — Leading Projects Practice Question

This PMP practice question tests your understanding of people — leading projects. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which THREE factors are most critical when selecting a conflict resolution technique for a project team? (Choose three.)

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties.

Option B is correct because the personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties directly influence which conflict resolution technique (e.g., collaborating, compromising, avoiding) will be effective. A technique that works for a collaborative team may fail with highly competitive individuals, so understanding interpersonal dynamics is critical for selecting an approach that de-escalates rather than intensifies the conflict.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The cost of implementing the resolution technique.

    Why it's wrong here

    Techniques are typically low-cost; effectiveness is priority.

  • The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties.

    Why this is correct

    Helps choose collaborative vs. directive approach.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The severity and complexity of the conflict.

    Why this is correct

    Determines the intensity of intervention needed.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The potential impact on project schedule and budget.

    Why this is correct

    High-impact conflicts need faster resolution.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The organizational hierarchy and reporting structure.

    Why it's wrong here

    Less relevant; focus is on the conflict itself.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often mistakenly include 'organizational hierarchy' (Option E) because they confuse reporting structure with authority to resolve conflicts, but the PMP exam focuses on the conflict's characteristics and interpersonal dynamics, not formal hierarchy.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

The PMBOK Guide (7th Edition) identifies conflict resolution as a key interpersonal skill in the People domain, and the selection of a technique (e.g., Thomas-Kilmann model's five modes) depends on assessing the conflict's intensity and the desired outcome. For example, a low-severity conflict with a minor schedule impact might be resolved via smoothing, while a high-severity conflict threatening critical path tasks requires collaborating or forcing. Real-world scenarios often involve cross-functional teams where personality clashes (e.g., between a risk-averse QA lead and a deadline-driven developer) necessitate a tailored approach like compromising to maintain team cohesion.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the PMP exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related PMP practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free PMP practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this PMP question test?

People — Leading Projects — This question tests People — Leading Projects — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties. — Option B is correct because the personalities and relationship of the conflicting parties directly influence which conflict resolution technique (e.g., collaborating, compromising, avoiding) will be effective. A technique that works for a collaborative team may fail with highly competitive individuals, so understanding interpersonal dynamics is critical for selecting an approach that de-escalates rather than intensifies the conflict.

What should I do if I get this PMP question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on PMP

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. Your project team is experiencing conflict due to different working styles: some members prefer detailed plans, while others prefer flexibility. The conflict is affecting morale and productivity. Which THREE actions should you take to resolve the situation?

hard
  • A.Develop a team charter that includes agreed-upon norms for planning and flexibility
  • B.Negotiate a compromise where both approaches are used in different phases of the project
  • C.Facilitate a team discussion to understand each member's working style preferences
  • D.Ignore the conflict and focus on delivering the project on time
  • E.Decide on a single working style and enforce it across the team

Why A: Developing a team charter that includes agreed-upon norms for planning and flexibility is correct because it formalizes a shared understanding of how the team will operate, directly addressing the root cause of the conflict—differing working styles. This aligns with the PMBOK Guide's emphasis on establishing team ground rules early to prevent and resolve interpersonal conflicts, thereby improving morale and productivity.

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This PMP practice question is part of Courseiva's free PMI certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the PMP exam.