PMP Process — Managing Technical Aspects Practice Question

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

• ✓

  Facilitate a meeting where each developer presents their approach and the team evaluates pros and cons against project objectives

  Why this is correct

  This option exemplifies the "collaborate/problem-solve" conflict resolution technique, which is highly effective for complex technical disagreements. By facilitating a meeting, the Project Manager enables open communication, allowing each developer to articulate their rationale and fostering a shared understanding of the different perspectives. The team's collective evaluation against project objectives ensures the chosen solution aligns with the project's best interests, promoting buy-in and strengthening team cohesion rather than imposing a solution.

• ✗

  Escalate the issue to the sponsor for a final decision

  Why it's wrong here

  Escalating a technical conflict between team members directly to the sponsor is generally an abdication of the Project Manager's responsibility to manage team dynamics and resolve issues at the lowest appropriate level. Premature escalation can undermine team autonomy, reduce the PM's credibility, and burden the sponsor with operational details they expect the PM to handle. This approach should only be considered if all attempts at resolution within the team have failed and the conflict significantly impacts project objectives or scope.

• ✗

  Make the decision yourself to save time and end the conflict

  Why it's wrong here

  While making a unilateral decision might seem efficient in the short term, it often leads to resentment, decreased team morale, and a lack of ownership over the chosen solution. This approach bypasses the valuable technical expertise of the senior developers and risks imposing a suboptimal solution that may not fully address the underlying technical complexities. A Project Manager should empower the team to find solutions, fostering a sense of accountability and leveraging collective intelligence rather than dictating.

• ✗

  Separate the developers to work on different features to avoid further conflict

  Why it's wrong here

  Separating developers to avoid conflict is an avoidance technique that fails to address the root cause of the disagreement, merely postponing or relocating the problem. This approach prevents the team from learning how to constructively resolve differences, potentially leading to recurring conflicts, fragmented solutions, and reduced knowledge sharing. A Project Manager's role is to facilitate resolution and build a resilient team capable of overcoming challenges, not to sidestep them.

Go deeper

Related to this question